Literature DB >> 28484307

Understanding Acoustic Cavitation Initiation by Porous Nanoparticles: Toward Nanoscale Agents for Ultrasound Imaging and Therapy.

Adem Yildirim1, Rajarshi Chattaraj2, Nicholas T Blum1, Andrew P Goodwin1.   

Abstract

Ultrasound is widely applied in medical diagnosis and therapy due to its safety, high penetration depth, and low cost. In order to improve the contrast of sonographs and efficiency of the ultrasound therapy, echogenic gas bodies or droplets (with diameters from 200 nm to 10 µm) are often used, which are not very stable in the bloodstream and unable to penetrate into target tissues. Recently, it was demonstrated that nanobubbles stabilized by nanoparticles can nucleate ultrasound responsive microbubbles under reduced acoustic pressures, which is very promising for the development of nanoscale (<100 nm) ultrasound agents. However, there is still very little understanding about the effects of nanoparticle properties on the stabilization of nanobubbles and nucleation of acoustic cavitation by these nanobubbles. Here, a series of mesoporous silica nanoparticles with sizes around 100 nm but with different morphologies were synthesized to understand the effects of nanoparticle porosity, surface roughness, hydrophobicity, and hydrophilic surface modification on acoustic cavitation inception by porous nanoparticles. The chemical analyses of the nanoparticles showed that, while the nanoparticles were prepared using the same silica precursor (TEOS) and surfactant (CTAB), they revealed varying amounts of carbon impurities, hydroxyl content, and degrees of silica crosslinking. Carbon impurities or hydrophobic modification with methyl groups is found to be essential for nanobubble stabilization by mesoporous silica nanoparticles. The acoustic cavitation experiments in the presence of ethanol and/or bovine serum albumin (BSA) demonstrated that acoustic cavitation is predominantly nucleated by the nanobubbles stabilized at the nanoparticle surface not inside the mesopores. Finally, acoustic cavitation experiments with rough and smooth nanoparticles were suggested that a rough nanoparticle surface is needed to largely preserve surface nanobubbles after coating the surface with hydrophilic macromolecules, which is required for in vivo applications of nanoparticles.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 28484307      PMCID: PMC5419691          DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b02634

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Mater        ISSN: 0897-4756            Impact factor:   9.811


  44 in total

1.  Ultrasound-induced inertial cavitation from gas-stabilizing nanoparticles.

Authors:  J J Kwan; S Graham; R Myers; R Carlisle; E Stride; C C Coussios
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2015-08-19

2.  Formation of hollow silica colloids through a spontaneous dissolution-regrowth process.

Authors:  Tierui Zhang; Jianping Ge; Yongxing Hu; Qiao Zhang; Shaul Aloni; Yadong Yin
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 15.336

3.  The evolution of the protein corona around nanoparticles: a test study.

Authors:  Martin Lundqvist; Johannes Stigler; Tommy Cedervall; Tord Berggård; Michelle B Flanagan; Iseult Lynch; Giuliano Elia; Kenneth Dawson
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 15.881

4.  Biphase stratification approach to three-dimensional dendritic biodegradable mesoporous silica nanospheres.

Authors:  Dengke Shen; Jianping Yang; Xiaomin Li; Lei Zhou; Renyuan Zhang; Wei Li; Lei Chen; Rui Wang; Fan Zhang; Dongyuan Zhao
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 11.189

5.  A new approach to nucleation of cavitation bubbles at chemically modified surfaces.

Authors:  Valentina Belova; Dmitry G Shchukin; Dmitry A Gorin; Alexey Kopyshev; Helmuth Möhwald
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 3.676

6.  Effective cancer cell killing by hydrophobic nanovoid-enhanced cavitation under safe low-energy ultrasound.

Authors:  Yang Zhao; Yingchun Zhu; Jingke Fu; Lianzhou Wang
Journal:  Chem Asian J       Date:  2013-12-11

7.  Scanning ultrasound removes amyloid-β and restores memory in an Alzheimer's disease mouse model.

Authors:  Gerhard Leinenga; Jürgen Götz
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 17.956

8.  Processing pathway dependence of amorphous silica nanoparticle toxicity: colloidal vs pyrolytic.

Authors:  Haiyuan Zhang; Darren R Dunphy; Xingmao Jiang; Huan Meng; Bingbing Sun; Derrick Tarn; Min Xue; Xiang Wang; Sijie Lin; Zhaoxia Ji; Ruibin Li; Fred L Garcia; Jing Yang; Martin L Kirk; Tian Xia; Jeffrey I Zink; Andre Nel; C Jeffrey Brinker
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 9.  Advances in ultrasound mediated gene therapy using microbubble contrast agents.

Authors:  Shashank R Sirsi; Mark A Borden
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2012-12-31       Impact factor: 11.556

Review 10.  Design considerations for nanotherapeutics in oncology.

Authors:  Triantafyllos Stylianopoulos; Rakesh K Jain
Journal:  Nanomedicine       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 5.307

View more
  14 in total

1.  Phospholipid-Coated Hydrophobic Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles Enhance Thrombectomy by High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound with Low Production of Embolism-Inducing Clot Debris.

Authors:  Nicholas T Blum; Ciara M Gyorkos; Spencer J Narowetz; Evan N Mueller; Andrew P Goodwin
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 9.229

Review 2.  Theragnostic potentials of core/shell mesoporous silica nanostructures.

Authors:  Aswathy Ravindran Girija; Sivakumar Balasubramanian
Journal:  Nanotheranostics       Date:  2019-01-01

3.  Phospholipid Capped Mesoporous Nanoparticles for Targeted High Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation.

Authors:  Adem Yildirim; Rajarshi Chattaraj; Nicholas T Blum; Dennis Shi; Kaushlendra Kumar; Andrew P Goodwin
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 9.933

4.  Temperature-Responsive Hydrophobic Silica Nanoparticle Ultrasound Contrast Agents Directed by Phospholipid Phase Behavior.

Authors:  Nicholas T Blum; Adem Yildirim; Ciara Gyorkos; Dennis Shi; Angela Cai; Rajarshi Chattaraj; Andrew P Goodwin
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 9.229

5.  Engineering Plasmonic Nanoparticles for Enhanced Photoacoustic Imaging.

Authors:  Yash Mantri; Jesse V Jokerst
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 15.881

6.  Nanoparticle-Mediated Acoustic Cavitation Enables High Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation Without Tissue Heating.

Authors:  Adem Yildirim; Dennis Shi; Shambojit Roy; Nicholas T Blum; Rajarshi Chattaraj; Jennifer N Cha; Andrew P Goodwin
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 9.229

Review 7.  From Micro- to Nano-Multifunctional Theranostic Platform: Effective Ultrasound Imaging Is Not Just a Matter of Scale.

Authors:  Sara Zullino; Monica Argenziano; Ilaria Stura; Caterina Guiot; Roberta Cavalli
Journal:  Mol Imaging       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 4.488

8.  Nanoparticle-assisted ultrasound: A special focus on sonodynamic therapy against cancer.

Authors:  Giancarlo Canavese; Andrea Ancona; Luisa Racca; Marta Canta; Bianca Dumontel; Federica Barbaresco; Tania Limongi; Valentina Cauda
Journal:  Chem Eng J       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 13.273

Review 9.  Colloids, nanoparticles, and materials for imaging, delivery, ablation, and theranostics by focused ultrasound (FUS).

Authors:  Adem Yildirim; Nicholas T Blum; Andrew P Goodwin
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2019-04-13       Impact factor: 11.556

10.  Cavitation-threshold Determination and Rheological-parameters Estimation of Albumin-stabilized Nanobubbles.

Authors:  Maxime Lafond; Akiko Watanabe; Shin Yoshizawa; Shin-Ichiro Umemura; Katsuro Tachibana
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.