Literature DB >> 28483680

Preoperative gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for predicting microvascular invasion in patients with single hepatocellular carcinoma.

Sunyoung Lee1, Seong Hyun Kim2, Ji Eun Lee1, Dong Hyun Sinn3, Cheol Keun Park4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: This study aimed to identify preoperative magnetic resonance (MR) imaging biomarkers for predicting microvascular invasion (MVI), to determine their diagnostic performance and to evaluate whether they are associated with early recurrence after surgery for single hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
METHODS: The study included 197 patients with surgically resected HCC (≤5cm) who underwent preoperative gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging. Significant MR imaging findings for predicting MVI were identified by univariate and multivariate analyses. Early recurrence rates (<2years) were analyzed with respect to significant imaging findings for predicting MVI.
RESULTS: Three MR imaging features were independently associated with MVI: arterial peritumoral enhancement (odds ratio [OR]=5.184; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.228, 12.063; p<0.001), non-smooth tumor margin (OR=3.555; 95% CI: 1.627, 7.769; p=0.001), and peritumoral hypointensity on hepatobiliary phase (HBP) (OR=4.705; 95% CI: 1.671, 13.246; p=0.003). When two of three findings were combined, the specificity was 92.5% (124/134). When all three findings were satisfied, the specificity was 99.3% (133/134). Early recurrence rates were significantly higher in patients with single HCC, with two or three significant MR imaging findings, compared to those with none (27.9% vs. 12.6%, respectively, p=0.030).
CONCLUSIONS: A combination of two or more of the following; arterial peritumoral enhancement, non-smooth tumor margin, and peritumoral hypointensity on HBP, can be used as a preoperative imaging biomarker for predicting MVI, with specificity >90%, and is associated with early recurrence after surgery of single HCC. Lay summary: A combination of two or more of the following; arterial peritumoral enhancement, non-smooth tumor margin, and peritumoral hypointensity on hepatobiliary phase, can be used as a preoperative imaging biomarker for predicting microvascular invasion, with specificity >90%, and is associated with early recurrence after curative resection of single HCC.
Copyright © 2017 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomarkers; Gadoxetic acid; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Magnetic resonance imaging; Microvascular invasion

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28483680     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.04.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hepatol        ISSN: 0168-8278            Impact factor:   25.083


  97 in total

1.  Preoperative prediction of microvascular invasion in hepatocellular cancer: a radiomics model using Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Shi-Ting Feng; Yingmei Jia; Bing Liao; Bingsheng Huang; Qian Zhou; Xin Li; Kaikai Wei; Lili Chen; Bin Li; Wei Wang; Shuling Chen; Xiaofang He; Haibo Wang; Sui Peng; Ze-Bin Chen; Mimi Tang; Zhihang Chen; Yang Hou; Zhenwei Peng; Ming Kuang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Current status of imaging biomarkers predicting the biological nature of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Norihide Yoneda; Osamu Matsui; Satoshi Kobayashi; Azusa Kitao; Kazuto Kozaka; Dai Inoue; Kotaro Yoshida; Tetsuya Minami; Wataru Koda; Toshifumi Gabata
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2019-02-02       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  Challenges and prospects in prediction and treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma with microvascular invasion.

Authors:  Takumi Kawaguchi; Shigeo Shimose; Takuji Torimura
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 7.293

Review 4.  Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Current Imaging Modalities for Diagnosis and Prognosis.

Authors:  Maxime Ronot; Yvonne Purcell; Valérie Vilgrain
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Nomogram to Assist in Surgical Plan for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: a Prediction Model for Microvascular Invasion.

Authors:  Shengtao Lin; Feng Ye; Weiqi Rong; Ying Song; Fan Wu; Yunhe Liu; Yiling Zheng; Tana Siqin; Kai Zhang; Liming Wang; Jianxiong Wu
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Using deep learning to predict microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma based on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI combined with clinical parameters.

Authors:  Danjun Song; Yueyue Wang; Wentao Wang; Yining Wang; Jiabin Cai; Kai Zhu; Minzhi Lv; Qiang Gao; Jian Zhou; Jia Fan; Shengxiang Rao; Manning Wang; Xiaoying Wang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 4.553

7.  Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI as a predictor of recurrence of HCC after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Sunyoung Lee; Kyoung Won Kim; Woo Kyoung Jeong; Myeong-Jin Kim; Gi Hong Choi; Jin Sub Choi; Gi-Won Song; Sung-Gyu Lee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  A radiomics nomogram for preoperative prediction of microvascular invasion risk in hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Jie Peng; Jing Zhang; Qifan Zhang; Yikai Xu; Jie Zhou; Li Liu
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2018 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.630

9.  Imaging features of microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma developed after direct-acting antiviral therapy in HCV-related cirrhosis.

Authors:  Matteo Renzulli; Federica Buonfiglioli; Fabio Conti; Stefano Brocchi; Ilaria Serio; Francesco Giuseppe Foschi; Paolo Caraceni; Giuseppe Mazzella; Gabriella Verucchi; Rita Golfieri; Pietro Andreone; Stefano Brillanti
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  A scientometric analysis on hepatocellular carcinoma magnetic resonance imaging research from 2008 to 2017.

Authors:  Da-Wei Yang; Xiao-Pei Wang; Zhen-Chang Wang; Zheng-Han Yang; Xue-Feng Bian
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2019-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.