Literature DB >> 28483546

Impact of a Structured Report Template on the Quality of CT and MRI Reports for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Diagnosis.

Milana Flusberg1, Jeremy Ganeles2, Tulay Ekinci2, Shlomit Goldberg-Stein2, Viktoriya Paroder2, Mariya Kobi2, Victoria Chernyak2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the impact of a Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) structured template on quality of reports for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A departmental structured LI-RADS template was adopted in April 2015. CT and MRI reports from September 2014 to February 2016 with probable or definite HCC were reviewed. Reporting of the following was recorded for each lesion and compared between template and free-text reports: (1) LI-RADS category, (2) Couinaud segment, and (3) unequivocal description of presence or absence of major LI-RADS HCC features: arterial phase hyperenhancement, "washout," diameter, threshold growth, and "capsule."
RESULTS: There were 306 definite or probable HCCs, 125 (40.8%) reported with free text and 181 (59.2%) with the template. LI-RADS category was reported in 23 of 125 (18.4%) HCCs with free text and in 178 of 181 (98.3%) HCCs with the template (P < .001). Couinaud segment was reported in 102 of 125 (81.6%) HCCs with free text and in 181 of 181 (100%) HCCs with the template (P < .001). Diameter was reported in 118 of 125 (94.4%) HCCs with free text and in 181 of 181 (100%) HCCs with the template (P = .001). Threshold growth was reported in 36 of 125 (28.8%) HCCs with free text and in 169 of 181 (93.4%) HCCs with the template (P < .001). Arterial phase hyperenhancement was reported in 101 of 125 (80.8%) HCCs with free text and in 177 of 181 (97.8%) HCCs with the template (P < .001). Washout was reported in 93 of 125 (74.4%) HCCs with free text and in 178 of 181 (98.3%) HCCs with the template (P < .001). Capsule was reported in 24 of 125 (19.2%) HCCs with free text and in 176 of 181 (97.2%) HCCs with the template (P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Use of structured LI-RADS template resulted in more comprehensive and consistent reporting of major HCC features and LI-RADS category compared with free-text reporting.
Copyright © 2017 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  LI-RADS; Structured reporting

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28483546     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.02.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  19 in total

Review 1.  [Image-guided, minimally invasive surgery and other local therapeutic procedures for primary liver tumors].

Authors:  D L Stippel; R Wahba; C J Bruns; A Bunck; C Baues; T Persigehl
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Adnexal mass staging CT with a disease-specific structured report compared to simple structured report.

Authors:  Andrea Franconeri; Johannes Boos; Jieming Fang; Anuradha Shenoy-Bhangle; Michelle Perillo; Catherine J Wei; Leslie Garrett; Katharine Esselen; Liu Fong; Olga R Brook
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Variability in utilization and techniques of pelvic floor imaging: findings of the SAR pelvic floor dysfunction disease-focused panel.

Authors:  Milana Flusberg; Yin Xi; Kedar Jambhekar; Simin Bahrami; Victoria Chernyak; Neeraj Lalwani; Mark Lockhart; Roopa Ram; Julia R Fielding; Rania Farouk El Sayed; Gaurav Khatri
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-02-13

Review 4.  Up-to-Date Role of CT/MRI LI-RADS in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Guilherme Moura Cunha; Victoria Chernyak; Kathryn J Fowler; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  J Hepatocell Carcinoma       Date:  2021-05-31

5.  Radiologist Productivity Analytics: Factors Impacting Abdominal Pelvic CT Exam Reporting Times.

Authors:  Amar Udare; Minu Agarwal; Kiret Dhindsa; Amer Alaref; Michael Patlas; Abdullah Alabousi; Yoan K Kagoma; Christian B van der Pol
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Structured bone marrow report as an assessment tool in patients with hematopoietic disorders.

Authors:  Mercedes Roca-Espiau; Esther Valero-Tena; Maria Jose Ereño-Ealo; Pilar Giraldo
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-07

7.  Assessing the Impact of Structured Reports for Fluoroscopic Double-Contrast Barium Esophagrams.

Authors:  Samuel J Galgano; Mason Kirkland; Taylor Kuhlman; Ahmed Khalaf; Desiree E Morgan; Cheri L Canon; Jessica G Zarzour
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2021-11-20       Impact factor: 2.733

Review 8.  Endometrial Cancer MRI staging: Updated Guidelines of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology.

Authors:  Stephanie Nougaret; Mariana Horta; Evis Sala; Yulia Lakhman; Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara; Aki Kido; Gabriele Masselli; Nishat Bharwani; Elizabeth Sadowski; Andrea Ertmer; Milagros Otero-Garcia; Rahel A Kubik-Huch; Teresa M Cunha; Andrea Rockall; Rosemarie Forstner
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  How to Use LI-RADS to Report Liver CT and MRI Observations.

Authors:  Guilherme M Cunha; Kathryn J Fowler; Alexandra Roudenko; Bachir Taouli; Alice W Fung; Khaled M Elsayes; Robert M Marks; Irene Cruite; Natally Horvat; Victoria Chernyak; Claude B Sirlin; An Tang
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 6.312

10.  Structured reporting has the potential to reduce reporting times of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry exams.

Authors:  Su Hwan Kim; Lara M Sobez; Judith E Spiro; Adrian Curta; Felix Ceelen; Eric Kampmann; Martin Goepfert; Raphael Bodensohn; Felix G Meinel; Wieland H Sommer; Nora N Sommer; Franziska Galiè
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.