Literature DB >> 28483501

Fertility outcomes after extended searches for ejaculated spermatozoa in men with virtual azoospermia.

Netanella Miller1, Tal Biron-Shental2, Yael Pasternak3, Michael Belenky4, Shai Shefi5, Pavel Itsykson6, Arie Berkovitz7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the fertility outcomes of extended searches for ejaculated spermatozoa in men with virtual azoospermia.
DESIGN: A retrospective cohort of 242 couples whose male partner suffered from nonobstructive azoospermia and who were treated with the use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).
SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): One hundred forty patients were referred to an extended search in the ejaculate and 102 patients were referred to microsurgical testicular sperm extraction (microTESE). INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Rates of sperm retrieval, fertilization, and pregnancy, take-home baby rate, and missed abortion rate were analyzed and compared. RESULT(S): In the ejaculated spermatozoa group, motile spermatozoa were retrieved in 91 cases (65%) and on oocyte pick-up day in 71 cases (78%), compared with 70 cases (68%) in the microTESE group, with a similar incidence of sperm retrieval between groups. No significant difference was found between groups regarding mean number of embryo transfer and fertilization and pregnancy rates. There was no significant difference between groups regarding take-home baby rate. A significantly higher first-trimester missed abortion rate was found in the ejaculated sperm group (n = 14; 52%) compared with the microTESE group (n = 3; 8.6%). CONCLUSION(S): Conducting an extended spermatozoa search in the ejaculate of men with virtual azoospermia can provide pregnancy rates similar to those obtained with the use of microTESE, with a higher rate of spontaneous abortions in the ejaculate group.
Copyright © 2017 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ICSI; Virtual azoospermia; ejaculated spermatozoa; intracytoplasmic sperm injection; live birth rate; microTESE; pregnancy rate

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28483501     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.04.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  4 in total

1.  Sperm origins and concentration do not impact the clinical outcomes in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles.

Authors:  Cen Yang; Ze-Hong Zhou; Dan-Ni Zheng; Xiao-Fei Xu; Jin Huang; Ying Lian; Jie Qiao
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2018 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.285

2.  A Simple and Efficient Method to Cryopreserve Human Ejaculated and Testicular Spermatozoa in -80°C Freezer.

Authors:  Xiaohan Wang; Fangting Lu; Shun Bai; Limin Wu; Lingli Huang; Naru Zhou; Bo Xu; Yangyang Wan; Rentao Jin; Xiaohua Jiang; Xianhong Tong
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 3.  Cryopreservation of single-sperm: where are we today?

Authors:  Shasha Liu; Fuping Li
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 5.211

4.  Role of Cytocentrifugation Combined with Nuclear Fast Picroindigocarmine Staining in Detecting Cryptozoospermia in Men Diagnosed with Azoospermia.

Authors:  Rakesh Kumar Sharma; Sajal Gupta; Ashok Agarwal; Renata Finelli; Shinnosuke Kuroda; Ramadan Saleh; Florence Boitrelle; Parviz Kavoussi; Murat Gül; Nicholas Tadros; Edmund Ko; Ala'a Farkouh; Ralf Henkel; Mohamed Arafa; Amarnath Rambhatla; Rupin Shah
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 6.494

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.