Literature DB >> 28483330

A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Impact of the Retzius-sparing Approach on Early Urinary Continence Recovery After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.

Deepansh Dalela1, Wooju Jeong2, Madhu-Ashni Prasad2, Akshay Sood2, Firas Abdollah2, Mireya Diaz2, Patrick Karabon2, Jesse Sammon3, Marcus Jamil2, Brad Baize2, Andrea Simone2, Mani Menon2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Retzius-sparing (posterior) robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) may expedite postoperative urinary continence recovery.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the short-term (≤3 mo) urinary continence (UC), urinary function (UF), and UF-related bother outcomes of posterior RARP compared with standard anterior approach RARP. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 120 patients aged 40-75 yr with low-intermediate-risk prostate cancer (per the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines) underwent primary RARP at a tertiary care institution. INTERVENTION: Eligible men were randomized to receive either posterior (n=60) or anterior (n=60) RARP. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSES: Primary outcome was UC (defined as 0 pads/one security liner per day) 1 week after catheter removal. Secondary outcomes were short-term (≤3 mo) UC recovery, and UF and UF-related bother scores (measured by the International Prostate Symptom Score [IPSS] and IPSS quality-of-life scores, respectively) assessed at 1 and 2 wk, and 1 and 3 mo following catheter removal. Continence outcomes were objectively verified using 24-hr pad weights. UC recovery was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression; UF and UF-related bother outcomes were compared using linear generalized estimating equations (GEEs). Perioperative complications, positive surgical margin, and biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCRFS) represent secondary outcomes reported in the study. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Compared with 48% in the anterior arm, 71% men undergoing posterior RARP were continent 1 wk after catheter removal (p=0.01); corresponding median 24-h pad weights were 25 and 5g (p=0.001). Median time to continence in posterior versus anterior RARP was 2 and 8 d postcatheter removal, respectively (log-rank p=0.02); results were confirmed on multivariable regression analyses. GEE analyses showed that UF-related bother (but not UF) scores were significantly lower in the posterior versus anterior RARP group at 1 wk, 2 wk, and 1 mo on GEE analyses. Incidence of postoperative complications (12% anterior vs 18% posterior) and probability of BCRFS (0.91 vs 0.91) were comparable in the two arms.
CONCLUSIONS: In this single-center randomized study, the Retzius-sparing approach of RARP resulted in earlier recovery of UC and lower UF-related bother compared with standard RARP. These results require long-term validation and reproduction by other centers, as well as studies on men with high-risk localized disease. PATIENT
SUMMARY: In our hands, men with low-intermediate-risk prostate cancer undergoing Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) had earlier recovery of urinary continence and lower urinary function-related bother than those undergoing standard RARP.
Copyright © 2017 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Prostate cancer; Randomized controlled trial; Retzius sparing; Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy; Urinary bother; Urinary continence

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28483330     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  34 in total

Review 1.  Focusing on sexual rehabilitation besides penile rehabilitation following radical prostatectomy is important.

Authors:  Daphné Vanderhaeghe; Maarten Albersen; Emmanuel Weyne
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 2.896

2.  Surgery: Retzius-sparing RARP improves continence recovery.

Authors:  Peter Sidaway
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Is Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy effective in early continence? A single-center experience of the first 50 patients.

Authors:  Kayhan Yılmaz; Çağatay Özsoy; Mahmut Taha Ölçücü; Eren Erdi Aksaray; Yahya Okuducu; Mutlu Ateş
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2020-11-20

4.  Retzius-sparing versus standard robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a prospective randomized comparison on immediate continence rates.

Authors:  Anastasios D Asimakopoulos; Luca Topazio; Michele De Angelis; Enrico Finazzi Agrò; Antonio Luigi Pastore; Andrea Fuschi; Filippo Annino
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Retzius-sparing technique independently predicts early recovery of urinary continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Hassan Kadhim; Kar Mun Ang; Wei Shen Tan; Arjun Nathan; Nicola Pavan; Giorgio Mazzon; Omar Al-Kadhi; Gu Di; Eoin Dinneen; Tim Briggs; Anand Kelkar; Prabhakar Rajan; Senthil Nathan; John D Kelly; Prasanna Sooriakumaran; Ashwin Sridhar
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2022-02-22

Review 6.  Considering the role of radical prostatectomy in 21st century prostate cancer care.

Authors:  Anthony J Costello
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 14.432

7.  Recommendations on robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a Brazilian experts' consensus.

Authors:  Eliney Ferreira Faria; Carlos Vaz Melo Maciel; André Berger; Anuar Mitre; Breno Dauster; Celso Heitor Freitas; Clovis Fraga; Daher Chade; Marcos Dall'Oglio; Francisco Carvalho; Franz Campos; Gustavo Franco Carvalhal; Gustavo Caserta Lemos; Gustavo Guimarães; Hamilton Zampolli; Joao Ricardo Alves; Joao Pádua Manzano; Marco Antônio Fortes; Marcos Flavio Holanda Rocha; Mauricio Rubinstein; Murilo Luz; Pedro Romanelli; Rafael Coelho; Raphael Rocha; Roberto Dias Machado; Rodolfo Borges Dos Reis; Stenio Zequi; Romulo Guida; Valdair Muglia; Marcos Tobias-Machado
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-01-11

Review 8.  Comparative effectiveness of robotic and open radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Rodrigo Rodrigues Pessoa; Paul Maroni; Janet Kukreja; Simon P Kim
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-05

9.  The impact of transition from conventional robot-assisted radical prostatectomy to retzius sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A retrospective multivariate analysis.

Authors:  T A Kishore; Milka James Kuriakose; Vishnu Raveendran; M K Ramaprasad
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2021-04-01

10.  Transvesical Retzius-Sparing Versus Standard Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Retrospective Propensity Score-Adjusted Analysis.

Authors:  Wen Deng; Hao Jiang; Xiaoqiang Liu; Luyao Chen; Weipeng Liu; Cheng Zhang; Xiaochen Zhou; Bin Fu; Gongxian Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.