| Literature DB >> 28482827 |
Helen E Gruber1,2, Jane A Ingram3, Gretchen L Hoelscher3, Emilio Marrero3, Edward N Hanley3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Back pain and disc degeneration have a growing socioeconomic healthcare impact. Mucin 1 (MUC1) is a transmembrane glycoprotein whose extracellular and intracellular domains participate in cellular signaling. Little is currently known about the presence or role of MUC1 in human disc degeneration.Entities:
Keywords: Disc degeneration; Interleukin 1-ß; Intervertebral disc; Mucin 1; Tumor necrosis factor-α
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28482827 PMCID: PMC5422927 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-017-1541-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord ISSN: 1471-2474 Impact factor: 2.362
Demographic features for subjects whose disc tissue was evaluated with immunohistochemistry or whose tissue or cells were utilized for molecular analysis
| Subject number | Age | Thompson score | Vertebral level | Specimen typea | Experimental useb |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 34 | I | Lumbar | CHTN | Mol |
| 2 | 30 | II | L3-4 | CHTN | Mol |
| 3 | 30 | II | L3-4 | CHTN | Mol |
| 4 | 54 | II | L4-5 | Surgical specimen | Mol |
| 5 | 21 | II | L5-S1 | Surgical specimen | Mol |
| 6 | 40 | II | L4-5 | Surgical specimen | Mol |
| 7 | 41 | V | L4-5 | Surgical specimen | Mol |
| 8 | 57 | V | C6-7 | Surgical specimen | Mol |
| 9 | 72 | V | L4-S1 | Surgical specimen | Mol |
| 10 | 1 | I | Lumbar | CHTN | Imm |
| 11 | Newborn | I | Lumbar | CHTN | Imm |
| 12 | 21 | II | L5-S1 | Surgical specimen | Imm |
| 13 | 24 | II | L5-S1 | Surgical specimen | Imm |
| 14 | 41 | II | L5-S1 | Surgical specimen | Imm |
| 15 | 29 | III | L5-S1 | Surgical specimen | Imm |
| 16 | 53 | III | L5-S1 | Surgical specimen | Imm |
| 17 | 54 | III | L4-5 | Surgical specimen | Imm |
| 18 | 58 | III | L2-3 | Surgical specimen | Imm |
| 19 | 39 | IV | L4-5 | Surgical specimen | Imm |
| 20 | 56 | IV | L2-3 | Surgical specimen | Imm |
| 21 | 59 | IV | L2-3 | Surgical specimen | Imm |
| 22 | 78 | IV | L3-4 | Surgical specimen | Imm |
| 23 | 39 | V | L5-S1 | Surgical specimen | Imm |
| 24 | 56 | V | L5-S1 | Surgical specimen | Imm |
| 25 | 62 | V | L5-S1 | Surgical specimen | Imm |
| 26 | 59 | IV | L4-5 | Surgical specimen | 3D and Mol |
| 27 | 59 | IV | L4-5 | Surgical specimen | 3D and Mol |
| 28 | 57 | III | C4-5 | Surgical specimen | 3D and Mol |
| 29 | 54 | IV | L3-4 | Surgical specimen | 3D and Mol |
a CHTN Cooperative Human Tissue Network, normal donor specimen, OR surgical specimen, L lumbar, C cervical
b Imm immunohistochemistry on disc tissue, 3D and Mol cells cultured in 3D and 3D mRNA harvested for microarray analysis, Mol human annulus tissue mRNA harvested for microarray analysis
Fig. 1Representative images showing immunolocalization of MUC1. a Grade IV specimen shows the outer annulus, with many spindle-shaped cells. b Large cluster of cells in the inner annulus showing cells with positive or negative localization. c Cytoplasmic immunolocalization present in an inner annulus cell from a grade IV specimen. d Localization along the rim of the lacunar margin of a disc cell in the inner annulus. e Fewer immunopositive cells were present in the nucleus pulposus regions of the disc. f Negative control section adjacent to that shown in a. (Arrows mark cells which do not show localization. Bar = 20 μm)
Fig. 2A significant, positive correlation was present between the proportion of cells exhibiting MUC1 immunolocalization and the disc Thompson grade (r 2 = 0.473; p = 0.009). (Dashed lines show the 95% confidence interval for the correlation)
Fig. 3Graphical presentation of the significant increase in the relative MUC1 expression in vivo in more degenerated Thompson grade V disc tissue vs. healthier grade I and II discs (* p = 0.02; from Mann-Whitney evaluation)
Fig. 4Representative images of cells cultured in 3D with immunolocalization of MUC1. a. Cells in the 3D construct under control; b. IL-1ß-treated cells; c. TNF-α-treated cells. “3D” marks the collagen sponge framework in which cells were cultured. d. Representative image from a negative control. (Arrows mark cells which do not show localization. Bar = 10 μm)
Fig. 5Graphical presentation of the relative MUC1 expression in control annulus cells compared to IL-1-ß or TNF-α treated cells cultured in 3D (* p = 0.0006 vs. relative control)