Literature DB >> 28482199

ADAR deaminase A-to-I editing of DNA and RNA moieties of RNA:DNA hybrids has implications for the mechanism of Ig somatic hypermutation.

Edward J Steele1, Robyn A Lindley2.   

Abstract

The implications are discussed of recently published biochemical studies on ADAR-mediated A-to-I DNA and RNA deamination at RNA:DNA hybrids. The significance of these data are related to previous work on strand-biased and codon-context mutation signatures in B lymphocytes and cancer genomes. Those studies have established that there are two significant strand biases at A:T and G:C base pairs, A-site mutations exceed T-site mutations (A>>T) by 2.9 fold and G-site mutations exceed C-site mutations (G>>C) by 1.7 fold. Both these strand biases are inconsistent with alternative "DNA Deamination" mechanisms, yet are expected consequences of the RNA/RT-based "Reverse Transcriptase" mechanism of immunoglobulin (Ig) somatic hypermutation (SHM). The A-to-I DNA editing component at RNA:DNA hybrids that is likely to occur in Transcription Bubbles, while important, is of far lower A-to-I editing efficiency than in dsRNA substrates. The RNA moiety of RNA:DNA hybrids is also edited at similar lower frequencies relative to the editing rate at dsRNA substrates. Further, if the A-to-I DNA editing at RNA:DNA hybrids were the sole cause of A-to-I (read as A-to-G) mutation events for Ig SHM in vivo then the exact opposite strand biases at A:T base pairs (T>>A) of what is actually observed (A>>T) would be predicted. It is concluded that the strand-biased somatic mutation patterns at both A:T and G:C base pairs in vivo are best interpreted by the sequential steps of the RNA/RT-based mechanism. Further, the direct DNA A-to-I deamination at Transcription Bubbles is expected to contribute to the T-to-C component of the strand-biased Ig SHM spectrum.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  A-to-I RNA and DNA editing; AID/APOBEC-deaminase oncogenesis; Codon-context mutations; DNA polymerase-η; Somatic hypermutation; Strand-biased mutations

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28482199     DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2017.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)        ISSN: 1568-7856


  5 in total

1.  Molecular model linking Th2 polarized M2 tumour-associated macrophages with deaminase-mediated cancer progression mutation signatures.

Authors:  Jared Mamrot; Siddharth Balachandran; Edward J Steele; Robyn A Lindley
Journal:  Scand J Immunol       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 3.487

2.  Reverse Transcriptase Mechanism of Somatic Hypermutation: 60 Years of Clonal Selection Theory.

Authors:  Edward J Steele
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 3.  The efficient Lamarckian spread of life in the cosmos.

Authors:  Edward J Steele; Reginald M Gorczynski; Robyn A Lindley; Yongsheng Liu; Robert Temple; Gensuke Tokoro; Dayal T Wickramasinghe; N Chandra Wickramasinghe
Journal:  Adv Genet       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 1.944

Review 4.  Regulatory T cells and co-evolution of allele-specific MHC recognition by the TCR.

Authors:  Edward J Steele; Robyn A Lindley
Journal:  Scand J Immunol       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 3.487

Review 5.  A proposed reverse transcription mechanism for (CAG)n and similar expandable repeats that cause neurological and other diseases.

Authors:  Andrew Franklin; Edward J Steele; Robyn A Lindley
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2020-02-26
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.