Literature DB >> 28481852

Baseline T Classification Predicts Early Tumor Regrowth After Nonoperative Management in Distal Rectal Cancer After Extended Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation and Initial Complete Clinical Response.

Angelita Habr-Gama1, Guilherme Pagin São Julião, Joaquim Gama-Rodrigues, Bruna Borba Vailati, Cinthia Ortega, Laura Melina Fernandez, Sérgio Eduardo Alonso Araújo, Rodrigo Oliva Perez.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Selected patients with rectal cancer and complete clinical response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation have been managed nonoperatively with acceptable outcomes. However, ≈20% of these patients will develop early tumor regrowth. Identification of these patients could select candidates for more intensive follow-up.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of baseline radiological T classification on recurrences after a complete clinical response managed nonoperatively after chemoradiation.
DESIGN: This was a retrospective review of a prospective collected database. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at a single center. PATIENTS: Patients with distal rectal cancer (cT2-4N0-2M0) undergoing extended chemoradiation (54 Gy + 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy) were eligible. Patients were reassessed for tumor response at 10 weeks after radiation completion. Patients with complete clinical response (clinical, radiological, and endoscopic) were managed nonoperatively and strictly followed. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Complete clinical response rates, early tumor regrowth rates (<12 mo), local recurrence-free survival, and distant metastases-free survival were measured.
RESULTS: A total of 91 consecutive patients with rectal cancer underwent extended chemoradiation. Sixty-one patients developed initial complete clinical response (67%). cT2 patients developed similar initial complete clinical response rates compared with cT3/T4 (72% vs 63%; p = 0.403). Early tumor regrowths were more frequent among baseline cT3/4 when compared with cT2 patients (30% vs 3%; p = 0.007). There were no differences in late local recurrences (p = 0.593) or systemic recurrences (p = 0.387). Local recurrence-free survival was significantly better for cT2 patients at 1 year (96% vs 69%; p = 0.009). After Cox regression analysis, baseline T stage was an independent predictor of improved local recurrence-free survival at 1 year (p = 0.03; OR = 0.09 (95% CI, 0.01-0.81)). LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by its small sample size, retrospective nature, and short follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: cT2 patients who develop complete clinical response after extended chemoradiation managed nonoperatively are less likely to develop early tumor regrowths when compared with cT3/4 patients. cT3/4 patients should undergo more intensive follow-up after a complete clinical response to allow for early detection of early regrowths.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28481852     DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000830

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  21 in total

1.  Therapeutic effects and limitations of chemoradiotherapy in advanced lower rectal cancer focusing on T4b.

Authors:  Kosuke Ozaki; Kazushige Kawai; Hiroaki Nozawa; Kazuhito Sasaki; Koji Murono; Shigenobu Emoto; Yuuki Iida; Hiroaki Ishii; Yuichiro Yokoyama; Hiroyuki Anzai; Hirofumi Sonoda; Kenichi Sugihara; Soichiro Ishihara
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Local regrowth after 'Watch and Wait' strategy: is salvage surgery enough for disease control?

Authors:  Roberto Peltrini; Emanuele Caruso; Luigi Bucci
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Systematic review and meta-analysis on outcomes of salvage therapy in patients with tumour recurrence during 'watch and wait' in rectal cancer.

Authors:  J On; J Shim; E H Aly
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Looking for the Good, Bad and the Ugly rectal cancers of the twenty-first century… or "How to avoid tears when peeling onions".

Authors:  R Glynne-Jones
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  The good, the bad and the ugly: rectal cancers in the twenty-first century.

Authors:  G P São Julião; A Habr-Gama; B B Vailati; R O Perez
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 3.781

6.  SSAT State-of-the-Art Conference: Advances in the Management of Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Evie Carchman; Daniel I Chu; Gregory D Kennedy; Melanie Morris; Marc Dakermandji; John R T Monson; Laura Melina Fernandez; Rodrigo Oliva Perez; Alessandro Fichera; Marco E Allaix; David Liska
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Report from the 19th annual Western Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference; Winnipeg, Manitoba; 29-30 September 2017.

Authors:  C A Kim; S Ahmed; S Ahmed; B Brunet; H Chalchal; R Deobald; C Doll; M P Dupre; V Gordon; R M Lee-Ying; H Lim; D Liu; J M Loree; J P McGhie; K Mulder; J Park; B Yip; R P Wong; A Zaidi
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 3.677

8.  Rectal sparing approach after preoperative radio- and/or chemotherapy (RESARCH) in patients with rectal cancer: potential pitfalls of a multicentre observational study.

Authors:  R O Perez; A Habr-Gama; G P São Julião; B B Vailati
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 9.  'Watch and wait' in rectal cancer: summary of the current evidence.

Authors:  Jason On; Emad H Aly
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 10.  Current Status of the Management of Stage I Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Craig Howard Olson
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 5.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.