Literature DB >> 28481811

Trochanteric Entry for Femoral Lengthening Nails in Children: Is It Safe?

Ahmed I Hammouda1, Julio J Jauregui, Martin G Gesheff, Shawn C Standard, John E Herzenberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Antegrade intramedullary (IM) nailing for skeletally immature femur fractures can damage the capital femoral epiphysis blood supply, leading to avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head. Reported AVN rates are 2% for piriformis entry and 1.4% for trochanteric entry. None of previous reports described IM lengthening nails for limb lengthening procedures. We have used self-lengthening telescopic nails with a proximal Herzog bend and standard trochanteric entry for femoral lengthening in children. The purpose of this study is to determine whether trochanteric entry IM lengthening nails can be used safely (no AVN or proximal femoral deformity) in the skeletally immature femur.
METHODS: A retrospective review was performed between 2004 and 2014 to determine all skeletally immature patients younger than 18 years of age who had a reamed IM lengthening nail inserted through the greater trochanter, with at least 1-year follow-up.
RESULTS: Thirty-one femurs were lengthened in 28 patients (17 males and 11 females). The etiology was congenital femoral deficiency (10), achondroplasia (6), post-traumatic (5), hemihypertrophy (3), Ollier disease (2), and miscellaneous (5). An attending surgeon was present for all procedures. Mean age at time of surgery was 12.9 years (range, 7 to 17 y). Mean follow-up was 3.5 years (range, 1.4 to 9 y). The average amount of lengthening was 5.4 cm (range, 3 to 6.7 cm). Twenty-four nails were 10.7 mm in diameter. Seven nails were 12.5 mm in diameter. Intramedullary skeletal kinetic distractor was used in 18 femurs and PRECICE in 13 femurs. Ten segments (7 intramedullary skeletal kinetic distractor; 3 PRECICE) experienced 13 complications. None of the patients developed AVN or proximal femoral deformity.
CONCLUSIONS: IM lengthening nails inserted through the greater trochanter may be utilized in skeletally immature patients without increased risk of AVN of the femoral head or proximal femoral deformity. Larger trials would be helpful to confirm our hypothesis. We recommend careful surgical technique with liberal use of the image intensifier to avoid trauma to the femoral head blood supply. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-therapeutic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28481811     DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000636

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop        ISSN: 0271-6798            Impact factor:   2.324


  8 in total

1.  What Factors Correlate With Length of Stay and Readmission After Limb Lengthening Procedures? A Large-database Study.

Authors:  Ashish Mittal; Sachin Allahabadi; Rishab Jayaram; Abhinav Nalluri; Matt Callahan; Sanjeev Sabharwal
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 4.755

2.  What Are the Potential Benefits and Risks of Using Magnetically Driven Antegrade Intramedullary Lengthening Nails for Femoral Lengthening to Treat Leg Length Discrepancy?

Authors:  Adrien Frommer; Robert Roedl; Georg Gosheger; Maike Niemann; Dominik Turkowski; Gregor Toporowski; Christoph Theil; Andrea Laufer; Bjoern Vogt
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 4.755

Review 3.  [Application of motorized intramedullary lengthening nails in skeletally immature patients : Indications and limitations].

Authors:  A Frommer; R Rödl; G Gosheger; B Vogt
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Combined antegrade femur lengthening and distal deformity correction: a case series.

Authors:  Achraf Jardaly; Shawn R Gilbert
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  Rigid intramedullary nail fixation of traumatic femoral fractures in the skeletally immature.

Authors:  Christopher Del Balso; Debra Bartley; Megan Cashin; Timothy Carey; Abdel Rahman Lawendy
Journal:  OTA Int       Date:  2021-04-09

6.  Limb lengthening and deformity correction with externally controlled motorized intramedullary nails: evaluation of 50 consecutive lengthenings.

Authors:  Joachim Horn; Ivan Hvid; Stefan Huhnstock; Anne B Breen; Harald Steen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 3.717

7.  Role of mini-invasive bridge plate in the complex femoral fracture in school going children: A prospective clinical study of 30 cases.

Authors:  Amit Lakhani; S M Bhatnagar; Gobind Pratap Singh; Nikunj Gupta; Ena Sharma
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2021-04-08

8.  Does Retrograde Femoral Nailing through a Normal Physis Impair Growth? An Experimental Porcine Model.

Authors:  Ahmed A Abood; Ole Rahbek; Morten L Olesen; Bjørn B Christensen; Bjarne Møller-Madsen; Søren Kold
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2021 Jan-Apr
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.