Julie B Nielsen1, Helle D Zacho, Uwe Haberkorn, Karin M Nielsen, Katja Dettmann, Niels C Langkilde, Lars J Petersen. 1. From the *Department of Nuclear Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg; †Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark; ‡Radiologische Universitätsklinik, Nuklearmedizin, Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; §Department of Urology, Regional Hospital West Jutland, Holstebro; and ∥Department of Urology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical safety profile of the Ga-PSMA-11 ligand for PET/CT imaging in prospective clinical trials. METHODS: Eighty-eight patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent prostate cancer participated in 2 prospective trials. Safety reporting was identical in the 2 trials. The Ga-PSMA-11 ligand was administered as 2 MBq/kg body weight (mean, 9.2 μg, 9.7 nmol). The reporting of clinical adverse events (AEs) and the measurement of blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) were performed prior to injection (baseline); immediately after injection of Ga-PSMA-11 (postinjection); at 1, 10, and 60 minutes after injection; and after acquisition of the PET/CT scan (postscan). All hemodynamic assessments were performed in the supine position, except for the postscan measurement (sitting). The patients were interviewed regarding any AEs at baseline, postinjection, or postscan. In addition, the patients were instructed to report any AEs during the investigation and to contact the investigator if AEs occurred during the rest of the day. Adverse events were classified as mild, moderate, or severe by the patients and categorized by the investigator using the CTCAE (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) version 4.0. RESULTS: There were no reported clinical AEs. There were significant decreases in systolic BP (P < 0.001) and HR (P < 0.001) over time. In comparison, the diastolic BP increased significantly (P < 0.001). After removal of the last observation (supine position), there was no time-dependent change in systolic or diastolic BP, but the significant change in HR remained. The mean changes over the entire observation period were minimal (systolic BP, -6 to 5 mm Hg; diastolic BP, -2 to 3 mm Hg; HR, decrease of 5 beats/min). No patients developed hypotension. Fifty-five patients presented with hypertension at baseline, which increased by 1 CTCAE grade in 15 patients and by 2 grades in 2 patients. A large number of cases of asymptomatic (grade 1) bradycardia were observed, primarily in patients with preexisting bradycardia. One patient developed transient grade 1 tachycardia. No patients required medical intervention for cardiovascular perturbations. CONCLUSIONS: Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT was very well tolerated. We consider Ga-PSMA-11 to be safe for human application.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical safety profile of the Ga-PSMA-11 ligand for PET/CT imaging in prospective clinical trials. METHODS: Eighty-eight patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent prostate cancer participated in 2 prospective trials. Safety reporting was identical in the 2 trials. The Ga-PSMA-11 ligand was administered as 2 MBq/kg body weight (mean, 9.2 μg, 9.7 nmol). The reporting of clinical adverse events (AEs) and the measurement of blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) were performed prior to injection (baseline); immediately after injection of Ga-PSMA-11 (postinjection); at 1, 10, and 60 minutes after injection; and after acquisition of the PET/CT scan (postscan). All hemodynamic assessments were performed in the supine position, except for the postscan measurement (sitting). The patients were interviewed regarding any AEs at baseline, postinjection, or postscan. In addition, the patients were instructed to report any AEs during the investigation and to contact the investigator if AEs occurred during the rest of the day. Adverse events were classified as mild, moderate, or severe by the patients and categorized by the investigator using the CTCAE (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) version 4.0. RESULTS: There were no reported clinical AEs. There were significant decreases in systolic BP (P < 0.001) and HR (P < 0.001) over time. In comparison, the diastolic BP increased significantly (P < 0.001). After removal of the last observation (supine position), there was no time-dependent change in systolic or diastolic BP, but the significant change in HR remained. The mean changes over the entire observation period were minimal (systolic BP, -6 to 5 mm Hg; diastolic BP, -2 to 3 mm Hg; HR, decrease of 5 beats/min). No patients developed hypotension. Fifty-five patients presented with hypertension at baseline, which increased by 1 CTCAE grade in 15 patients and by 2 grades in 2 patients. A large number of cases of asymptomatic (grade 1) bradycardia were observed, primarily in patients with preexisting bradycardia. One patient developed transient grade 1 tachycardia. No patients required medical intervention for cardiovascular perturbations. CONCLUSIONS: Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT was very well tolerated. We consider Ga-PSMA-11 to be safe for human application.
Authors: Lars J Petersen; Julie B Nielsen; Niels C Langkilde; Astrid Petersen; Ali Afshar-Oromieh; Nandita M De Souza; Katja De Paepe; Rune V Fisker; Dennis T Arp; Jesper Carl; Uwe Haberkorn; Helle D Zacho Journal: World J Urol Date: 2019-06-12 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Helle D Zacho; Julie B Nielsen; Ali Afshar-Oromieh; Uwe Haberkorn; Nandita deSouza; Katja De Paepe; Katja Dettmann; Niels C Langkilde; Christian Haarmark; Rune V Fisker; Dennis T Arp; Jesper Carl; Jørgen B Jensen; Lars J Petersen Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2018-06-06 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Hossein Jadvar; Jeremie Calais; Stefano Fanti; Felix Feng; Kirsten L Greene; James L Gulley; Michael Hofman; Bridget F Koontz; Daniel W Lin; Michael J Morris; Steve P Rowe; Trevor J Royce; Simpa Salami; Bital Savir-Baruch; Sandy Srinivas; Thomas A Hope Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2021-09-30 Impact factor: 11.082
Authors: Solmaz AghaAmiri; Jo Simien; Alastair M Thompson; Julie Voss; Sukhen C Ghosh; Servando Hernandez Vargas; Sarah Kim; Ali Azhdarinia; Hop S Tran Cao Journal: Mol Imaging Date: 2021-02-02 Impact factor: 4.488
Authors: Asim Afaq; Heather Payne; Reena Davda; John Hines; Gary J R Cook; Marie Meagher; Dimitrios Priftakis; Victoria S Warbey; Anand Kelkar; Clement Orczyk; Anita Mitra; Sarah Needleman; Michael Ferris; Greg Mullen; Jamshed Bomanji Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2021-03-19 Impact factor: 11.082
Authors: Helle D Zacho; Søren Ravn; Ali Afshar-Oromieh; Joan Fledelius; June A Ejlersen; Lars J Petersen Journal: EJNMMI Res Date: 2020-04-08 Impact factor: 3.138