Literature DB >> 28480447

SURVEILLANCE FOR VANCOMYCIN RESISTANT ENTEROCOCCI IN A TERTIARY INSTITUTION IN SOUTH WESTERN NIGERIA.

Agantem Emmanuel Ekuma1, Oyin O Oduyebo2, Akinwale Michael Efunshile3,4, Brigitte Konig4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Enterococci are responsible for up to 12% of cases of healthcare associated infections worldwide and cause life threatening infections among critically ill patients. They show intrinsic and acquired resistance to a wide range of antimicrobial agents. Glycopeptide resistance is due to vanA, vanB, vanC, vanD, vanE, vanG and vanL genes.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the carriage rate of VRE among patients on prolonged hospitalization in Lagos University Teaching Hospital, assess the antimicrobial resistance pattern of VRE, identify factors associated with VRE colonization and describe the genetic determinants of enterococcal resistance to Vancomycin.
METHODS: VRE were isolated from rectal swabs collected from patients hospitalized for seven days or more in Lagos University Teaching Hospital and identified by Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization (MALDI) and Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR). Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed by E-test. PCR assay for Vancomycin resistance genes was also performed. Data on demographic and risk factors collected by questionnaire was tested for significance using Chi square.
RESULTS: Thirteen of 319 patients surveyed were colonized with VRE; one with vanA E. faecium, two with vanB E. faecium, ten with E. gallinarum and one with E. casseliflavus. Univariate analysis for risk factors associated with VRE colonization was only significant for the ward of admission. Only one VRE isolate showed full resistance to Vancomycin and Teicoplanin. Three were resistant to Ampicillin and nine to Ciprofloxacin but all were susceptible to Linezolid. High-level resistance to Gentamicin was found in four VRE isolates.
CONCLUSION: There is a low prevalence of VRE in Lagos University Teaching Hospital which may be spreading among patients in affected wards.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Enterococcus; Resistance; VRE; Vancomycin

Year:  2016        PMID: 28480447      PMCID: PMC5411987          DOI: 10.21010/ajid.v10i2.8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Afr J Infect Dis        ISSN: 2006-0165


Introduction

Since the late 1980s, there has been a rapid increase in glycopeptide resistance. While most of these reports have come from developed countries, it appeared that there had been a lag in development of glycopeptide resistance of enterococci in developing countries, probably due to low consumption of glycopeptide antibiotics as they are relatively expensive and the problems of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) have not been so prominent in these areas. In Nigeria, the role of enterococci in clinical infections has been poorly documented. Earlier reports had suggested that resistance to glycopeptides among enterococci had not emerged1. However, there have been recent reports of Vancomycin resistant enterococci (VRE) being isolated from clinical specimen and hands of health care workers in other centers in western Nigeria2,3. Since enterococci are part of the normal intestinal flora of humans, the gut provides a conducive environment for development and transfer of antimicrobial resistance determinants hence gastrointestinal colonization precedes infection in many cases4. Also, the recommendations for preventing the spread of Vancomycin resistance by the Hospital Infection Control Advisory Committee (HICPAC) of the US Centers for Disease Control include periodic culture surveys of stools or rectal swabs of patients at high risk for VRE infection or colonization5. Routine laboratory testing of all enterococcal isolates for Vancomycin resistance, also recommended by HICPAC, is not being practiced in most clinical laboratories in Nigeria due to the perceived absence or low incidence of Vancomycin resistance among enterococcal isolates. This practice may be masking the identification of emerging Vancomycin resistant enterococcal strains. We report a surveillance study carried out among patients on prolonged admission (over seven days) in Lagos University Teaching Hospital, a tertiary hospital in south western Nigeria.

Methods

Study Subjects

Between February and August 2013, patients on admission for seven days and over across medical, surgical and pediatric wards were recruited. Rectal swabs were collected from patients after obtaining informed consent by the investigators, other medical personnel or the patients themselves. Information on clinical condition, antibiotic consumption, invasive procedures and other risk factors was also recorded.

Sample Processing

The swabs were inoculated into bile esculin broth containing 6mg/ml of Vancomycin for 48 hours and then sub-cultured onto bile esculin agar. Black coloured colonies which were gram positive and catalase negative were transferred to blood agar plates for further identification.

Species Identification

Further testing of isolates was carried out at the Institute of Medical Microbiology and Infections Epidemiology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany. Isolates were identified by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time - off light (MALDI-TOF) Mass spectrometry using VITEK2 MS system (Biomerieux, France) and verified by specie specific enterococcal ddl PCR6. MALDI TOF Mass spectrometry is a mass spectrometry based technology that offers accurate, rapid, and inexpensive identification of microorganisms. Briefly, bacterial colonies are removed from agar culture plates, mixed with an excess of UV-absorbing matrix, and dried on steel target plates. The dried preparations are exposed to laser pulses, resulting in energy transfer from the matrix to the nonvolatile analyte molecules, with desorption of analyte into the gas phase. The ionized molecules are accelerated by electric potentials through a flight tube to the mass spectrometer, with separation of the biomarkers determined by their mass/charge ratio. The profile of biomarkers is then compared with profiles of a collection of well characterized organisms7. vanC genotype was determined by identification of organisms as E. gallinarum and E. casseliflavus since these species express the vanC genotype constitutively.

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

MIC to selected antibiotics (Vancomycin, Teicoplanin, Ampicillin, Gentamicin, Linezolid and Ciprofloxacin) was determined by the E-test and interpreted according to the CLSI guidelines8.

PCR

DNA was extracted from overnight cultures suspended in TE buffer using the MagNa Pure 96 system (Roche)9,10. PCR assay for Vancomycin resistance genes was carried out using standard protocols. Previously described primers were used6.

Statistical Analysis

Associations between risk factors and colonization were tested with Chi square using SPSS statistics 17.0.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Ill.). A p value of less than 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.

Ethical Issues

This study was reviewed and approved by the Research and Ethics Committee of the Lagos University Teaching Hospital before commencement. Informed consent was obtained from all participants before specimen collection.

Results

Rectal swabs were collected from 319 patients, 165 on surgical wards, 87 from medical and 67 from pediatric wards. Of the total number of patients surveyed, 165 were males. The ages of participants ranged from 0 to 87 years with a mean age of 34.48 years. Mean duration on admission was 49.13 days. Table 1 shows the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients surveyed in this study.
Table 1

Demographic and Clinical characteristics of patients surveyed

VariableVRETotal (n=319)P*
Absent (n=306)Present (n=13)
Mean age33.9147.2334.480.24[]
Male16141650.106
Female1459154
Ward
Male surgical853880.031
Female surgical74377
Male medical39140
Female medical41647
Pediatric36036
Pediatric surgery31031
Mean duration on admission50.0027.5049.130.313[*]
Tuberculosis130130.443
Malignancy521530.333
Diabetic220220.388
Renal161170.516
Invasive device present11061160.318
Foley catheter816870.716
Chest tube16016
CV line808
Ventilator202
Tracheostomy303
Anti-neoplastic therapy190190.443
Surgery13051350.505
Used Antibiotics288123000.557

ANOVA

Chi square/Fisher’s exact test

Demographic and Clinical characteristics of patients surveyed ANOVA Chi square/Fisher’s exact test Thirteen VRE strains were isolated; one vanA E. faecium, two vanB E. faecium, nine E. gallinarum and one E. casseliflavus (Table 2). Univariate analysis for risk factors associated with VRE colonization was only significant for the ward of admission (p=0.031) (Table 1).
Table 2

Distribution of VRE isolates by genotype and specie

GenotypeSpecieNumber
vanAE. faecium1
vanBE. faecium2
vanC1E. gallinarum9
vanC2E. casseliflavus1

Total13
Distribution of VRE isolates by genotype and specie The antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of enterococcal isolates carrying vanA, vanB and vanC genes are shown in table 3. The vanA isolate showed high level resistance to Vancomycin (MIC >256μg/mL) and teicoplanin (MIC = 48μg/mL) and was also resistant to ampicillin and ciprofloxacin. It was susceptible to linezolid and did not display high level resistance to gentamicin. Both vanB isolates showed intermediate resistance to Vancomycin (MIC = 8μg/mL) and were susceptible to teicoplanin. They were also resistant to ampicillin and ciprofloxacin and displayed high level resistance to gentamicin, but susceptible to linezolid. The vanC isolates showed Vancomycin MIC ranging from 1μg/mL to 8μg/mL and teicoplanin MIC <2μg/mL.
Table 3

Antimicrobial susceptibility profile of Enterococcus isolates carrying the vanA, vanB, vanC1 or vanC2 genes.

IDSpecieGenotypeVaTeAmCiLiHLGR
AE. faeciumvanA>25648>256>321.512
BE. faeciumvanB81>256>320.5>512
CE. faeciumvanB80.38>256>321.5>512
DE. gallinarumvanC10.50.51428
EE. gallinarumvanC161.50.75>320.75>512
FE. gallinarumvanC160.751.50.7513
GE. gallinarumvanC1610.5112
HE. gallinarumvanC1410.75>320.5>512
IE. gallinarumvanC10.380.5221.53
JE. gallinarumvanC180.752324
KE. gallinarumvanC140.750.75>320.752
LE. gallinarumvanC1410.50.750.752
ME. casseliflavusvanC280.750.125160.751.5

Va: Vancomycin, Te: Teicoplanin, Am: Ampicillin, Ci: Ciprofloxacin, Li: Linezolid, HLGR: High Level Gentamicin Resistance

Antimicrobial susceptibility profile of Enterococcus isolates carrying the vanA, vanB, vanC1 or vanC2 genes. Va: Vancomycin, Te: Teicoplanin, Am: Ampicillin, Ci: Ciprofloxacin, Li: Linezolid, HLGR: High Level Gentamicin Resistance

Discussion

The rapid spread of Vancomycin-resistant Enterococci (VRE) which occurred in Europe and the USA in the 1990s was driven by overuse of glycopeptides in animal farming in Europe and in clinical practice in the US11,12. In Africa, there have been very few reports of VRE, most being from South Africa. VRE cause a wide variety of infections involving the urinary tract, wound, bloodstream among other sites most commonly in hematological malignancy patients and transplant recipients.13 These cases are increasing in Nigeria14-16. This is the first report from Nigeria using molecular methods for differentiation of enterococci and for the determination of their resistance mechanisms. We conducted surveillance for VRE among patients admitted for 7 days and above in a tertiary hospital in South Western Nigeria. VRE were isolated from 13 (4.07%) of 319 patients screened. This is much lower than rates reported from South Africa17. However, this comparison may not be accurate because of differences in the characteristics of the populations studied. This finding is significant when compared to an earlier study in this center which showed no resistance to Vancomycin among enterococci1 although only clinical isolates of E. faecalis where studied. Other studies from western Nigeria have reported Vancomycin resistance in 43% of hospital acquired infections due to E. faecalis2 and 17.43% of 568 E. faecalis isolated from the hands of healthcare workers3. These results were obtained using phenotypic methods. The clinical data of patients colonized with enterococcal isolates carrying Vancomycin resistance genes are shown in table 4 while the number of patients surveyed who were receiving different classes of antibiotics is shown in table 5.
Table 4

Clinical data of the patients with enterococcus isolates carrying a gene element of Vancomycin resistance

IDAgeSexWardDuration on admission (days)Primary conditionAntibiotics administeredInvasive deviceTWBCSurgical interventionOthersVRE type
A48MMedical52Interstitial lung diseaseAmoxicillin-Clavulanate, AntiTBNone6.1NoneA
B70FMedical17Cerebrovascular diseaseLevofloxacinNoneNANoneB
C48FMedical22Hyperglycemic crisis, DVT and tibial fractureCeftriaxone, levofloxacin, metronidazoleUrethral catether10.0NoneB
D69FMedical40Autoimmune hemolytic anaemiaNoneNone6.3NoneC1
E25FMedical21Acute exarcebation of chronic kidney diseaseCeftriaxone, levofloxacin, metronidazoleUrethral catether8.5NoneDialysisC1
F38FSurgical19Breast cancerCeftriaxone, metronidazole, amoxicillinclavulanate13.3NoneC1
G27MSurgical28Intestinal obstructionLevofloxacin, metronidazole, amoxicillinclavulanateUrethral catether15.2Exploratory laparotomyC1
H48FSurgical12Head injuryCeftriaxone, CefiximeUrethral catether5.0CraniotomyC1
I25FMedical17SepsisCeftriaxone, meropenem, metronidazole, amoxicillinclavulanateNone24.6NoneC1
J27MSurgical48Chronic leg ulcerCeftriaxone, levofloxacin, ampicillinsulbactamNone29.9Skin graftingC1
K64FMedical20ParaparesisLevofloxacin, metronidazole, amoxicillinclavulanateUrethral catether13.8NoneC1
L59FSurgical22Leg painCeftriaxoneUrethral catether17.2NoneC1
M66MSurgical31Tibial fracture due to gunshotLevofloxacin, metronidazole, Ceftriaxone, CefiximeNone5.0Open reductionC2

TWBC - Total White Blood Cell Count, M - Male, F - Female, NA- Not available

Table 5

Antibiotic consumption pattern of patients surveyed

ANTIMICROBIALCOUNT%
Cephalosporins21567.4
Metronidazole18558.0
Quinolones16250.8
Penicillins8727.3
Carbapenems226.9
Anti-tuberculous226.9
Glycopeptides82.5
Antifungal/Antiretroviral51.6
Others*4815
None196.0

Macrolides, Aminoglycosides, Antifolates, Nitrofurantoin, etc.

Clinical data of the patients with enterococcus isolates carrying a gene element of Vancomycin resistance TWBC - Total White Blood Cell Count, M - Male, F - Female, NA- Not available Antibiotic consumption pattern of patients surveyed Macrolides, Aminoglycosides, Antifolates, Nitrofurantoin, etc. The low prevalence of VRE in this center may not be unconnected with the low consumption of Vancomycin among patients in this center. Only 2.5% of subjects studied had received Vancomycin. However, there was high consumption of cephalosporin (67.4% of subjects) and metronidazole (58.0% of subjects) which have also been implicated in the acquisition of VRE18. Both vanB isolates were recovered from patients admitted in the same ward suggesting nosocomial spread. Although vanB demonstrates lower level Vancomycin resistance and is more commonly susceptible to Teicoplanin, it has been shown to possess high potential for nosocomial transmission and conjugal transfer19-21. VanA VRE have been the more predominant genotype in Europe and the US, but vanB E. faecium may be more common in Africa as was found in South Africa17. Most microbiological studies of enterococci in Nigeria have only reported E. faecalis1,22. Ampicillin and Ciprofloxacin resistance were exhibited by the vanA and vanB isolates as also found in other studies23,24, whereas high-level resistance to gentamicin occurred only in the vanB isolates and two van C isolates. This rate of high-level resistance to gentamicin is comparable to that of an earlier study in this institution1. All VRE isolates remained susceptible to linezolid similar to the findings of a study in South America25. Linezolid is a very attractive antimicrobial therapy for VRE infections due to its favorable pharmacokinetic distribution, low incidence of adverse effects, and oral bioavailability26, however, resistance to this agent has begun to emerge26,27. Apart from the ward of admission, no other risk factor showed significant association with VRE colonization by Univariate analysis suggesting the possibility of nosocomial transmission. This may however be due to the relatively small number of patients who were colonized with VRE. The low prevalence of VRE will require larger studies to fully elucidate risk factors for VRE colonization in Nigeria. The findings of this study reveals the potential for the spread of Vancomycin Resistant Enterococci among patients in this center as well as the need for continuous surveillance and laboratory testing for Vancomycin resistance in enterococcal isolates for early identification of potential outbreaks of VRE infections, and institution of control measures. This study clearly shows that the prevalence of VRE is still low in Nigeria, giving Nigeria the opportunity to combat the emergence of VRE by measures such as antibiotic stewardship program and other infection control strategies.
  24 in total

Review 1.  Effects of antibiotics on nosocomial epidemiology of vancomycin-resistant enterococci.

Authors:  Stephan Harbarth; Sara Cosgrove; Yehuda Carmeli
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Relationships between enterococcal virulence and antimicrobial resistance.

Authors:  L M Mundy; D F Sahm; M Gilmore
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Epidemiology of glycopeptide-resistant enterococci colonizing high-risk patients in hospitals in Johannesburg, Republic of South Africa.

Authors:  A von Gottberg; W van Nierop; A Dusé; M Kassel; K McCarthy; A Brink; M Meyers; R Smego; H Koornhof
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Real-time PCR in clinical microbiology: applications for routine laboratory testing.

Authors:  M J Espy; J R Uhl; L M Sloan; S P Buckwalter; M F Jones; E A Vetter; J D C Yao; N L Wengenack; J E Rosenblatt; F R Cockerill; T F Smith
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  Possible horizontal transfer of the vanB2 gene among genetically diverse strains of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium in a Korean hospital.

Authors:  W G Lee; J A Jernigan; J K Rasheed; G J Anderson; F C Tenover
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Molecular epidemiology of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium: a prospective, multicenter study in South American hospitals.

Authors:  Diana Panesso; Jinnethe Reyes; Sandra Rincón; Lorena Díaz; Jessica Galloway-Peña; Jeannete Zurita; Carlos Carrillo; Altagracia Merentes; Manuel Guzmán; Javier A Adachi; Barbara E Murray; Cesar A Arias
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Near absence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci but high carriage rates of quinolone-resistant ampicillin-resistant enterococci among hospitalized patients and nonhospitalized individuals in Sweden.

Authors:  E Torell; O Cars; B Olsson-Liljequist; B M Hoffman; J Lindbäck; L G Burman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  VanA-type enterococci from humans, animals, and food: species distribution, population structure, Tn1546 typing and location, and virulence determinants.

Authors:  F Biavasco; G Foglia; C Paoletti; G Zandri; G Magi; E Guaglianone; A Sundsfjord; C Pruzzo; G Donelli; B Facinelli
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-03-09       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Prevalence of hospital-acquired enterococci infections in two primary-care hospitals in osogbo, southwestern Nigeria.

Authors:  Kafayat Olayinka Olawale; Solomon Olufemi Fadiora; Samuel Sunday Taiwo
Journal:  Afr J Infect Dis       Date:  2011

10.  Kidney transplantation in a low-resource setting: Nigeria experience.

Authors:  Fatiu Abiola Arogundade
Journal:  Kidney Int Suppl (2011)       Date:  2013-05
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review and meta-analysis on the prevalence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) among Nigerians.

Authors:  Oluwatosin Qawiyy Orababa; Jeffry Difiye Soriwei; Samuel Oluwamayowa Akinsuyi; Utibeima Udo Essiet; Olusola Michael Solesi
Journal:  Porto Biomed J       Date:  2021-02-11

2.  CARRIAGE OF MULTIDRUG RESISTANT ENTEROCOCCUS FAECIUM AND ENTEROCOCCUS FAECALIS AMONG APPARENTLY HEALTHY HUMANS.

Authors:  Solayide A Adesida; Cynthia C Ezenta; Ajoke O Adagbada; Amudat A Aladesokan; Akitoye O Coker
Journal:  Afr J Infect Dis       Date:  2017-06-08
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.