| Literature DB >> 28480420 |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Productionpan> of medicinpan>al planpan>ts inpan> conpan>trolled enpan>vironments, particularly hydroponic technology, provides opportunities for high quality biomass accumulation and optimizes production of secondary metabolites. Applying special watering regimes in combination with efficient soil draining is an encouraging new tool for the production of pharmaceutical relevant plants. The purpose of this paper was to evaluate the effect of substrate combinations and watering regimes on nutrient uptake, anti-F. oxysporum activity and secondary metabolite profile of S. aethiopicus.Entities:
Keywords: Siphonochilus aethiopicus; hydroponics; nutrient uptake; secondary metabolites; substrate combinations; watering regimes
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28480420 PMCID: PMC5412242 DOI: 10.21010/ajtcam.v14i3.10
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Afr J Tradit Complement Altern Med ISSN: 2505-0044
Composition of different substrate blends used in the study
| Treatment | Composition |
|---|---|
| T1 | Coir + vermiculite + perlite + bark (1:1:1:1) |
| T2 | Coir + bark (1:1) |
| T3 | Coir + perlite (1:1) |
| T4 | Coir + vermiculite (1:1) |
Figure 1Water holding capacity of four different substrate combinations (see Table 1 for details on treatments). Vertical columns are means and the bars on each column are ± standard errors of mean. Means followed by the same lower case letters on top of the bars means not significant different (P > 0.05) following comparison using Tukey Test.
Effect of different substrate combinations and watering regimes on macronutrient uptake of S. aethiopicus aerial parts
| Watering regimes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Nutrient (mg/kg) | Treatment | 3-days interval | 5-days interval |
| N | T1 | 30600 ± 1686.2 a | 29466 ± 751.29 a |
| T2 | 29866.6 ± 1102 a | 30533 ± 218.58 ab | |
| T3 | 30400 ± 901.85 a | 29466 ± 1201.8 a | |
| T4 | 33533.3 ± 788.1 a | 33400 ± 360.55 b | |
| P | T1 | 6200 ± 57.73 a | 5666.6 ± 240.37 a |
| T2 | 6033.3 ± 88.19 ab | 5800 ± 351.18 a | |
| T3 | 6266.6 ± 88.19 a | 5966.6 ± 284.8 a | |
| T4 | 5333.3 ± 284.8 b | 5266.6 ± 375.65 a | |
| K | T1 | 61300 ± 1096.96 ab | 57333.3 ± 1328.3 a |
| T2 | 63000 ± 763.76 b | 63866.6 ± 1922.9 a | |
| T3 | 60366.6 ± 328.29 ab | 59466.6 ± 1003.8 a | |
| T4 | 59033.3 ± 866.66 a | 58633.3 ± 2251.9 a | |
| Ca | T1 | 6033.3 ± 463.08 a | 5233.3 ± 33.33 a |
| T2 | 6166.6 ± 145.29 a | 5466.6 ± 133.33 a | |
| T3 | 6533.3 ± 185.59 a | 5133.3 ± 33.33 a | |
| T4 | 6433.3 ± 296.27 a | 5533.3 ± 366.66 a | |
| Mg | T1 | 3166.6 ± 120.18 a | 3233.3 ± 66.66 b |
| T2 | 2933.3 ± 33.33 a | 2800 ± 0 a | |
| T3 | 3000 ± 152.75 a | 2866.6 ± 88.19 a | |
| T4 | 2933.3 ± 88.19 a | 2933.3 ± 88.19 ab | |
| Na | T1 | 239.66 ± 47.69 a | 313 ± 22.47 a |
| T2 | 249.66 ± 35.07 a | 365.6 ± 28.75 a | |
| T3 | 382.66 ± 86.56 a | 337 ± 18.5 a | |
| T4 | 255.33 ± 29.62 a | 286.6 ± 15.05 a | |
Values presented are means ± SE. Means followed by same lowercase letters in the same column are not significantly different (P > 0.05) following comparison using Tukey test. Grey and white colours are used to differentiate columns with macronutrients.
T1= coir + vermiculite + perlite + bark, T2= coir + bark, T3= coir + perlite, T4= coir + vermiculite.
Effect of different substrate combinations and watering regimes on micronutrient uptake of S. aethiopicus aerial parts.
| Watering regimes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Nutrient (mg/kg) | Treatment | 3-days interval | 5-days interval |
| Mn | T1 | 206 ± 19.08 a | 234.6 ± 36.19 a |
| T2 | 158.66 ± 7.12 a | 240 ± 25.02 a | |
| T3 | 161.33 ± 37.22 a | 235.3 ± 39.26 a | |
| T4 | 220 ± 26.62 a | 240.3 ± 49.8 a | |
| Fe | T1 | 85.3 ± 2.18 b | 69 ± 3.21 a |
| T2 | 66 ± 5.68 a | 54 ± 3.05 a | |
| T3 | 61.3 ± 3.33 a | 65.3 ± 6.56 a | |
| T4 | 66.3 ± 4.66 a | 67.6 ± 3.92 a | |
| Cu | T1 | 3 ± 0 ab | 3.33 ± 0.33 a |
| T2 | 2.6 ± 0.33 ab | 3 ± 0 a | |
| T3 | 2 ± 0 a | 3 ± 0 a | |
| T4 | 3.3 ± 0.33 b | 3.33 ± 0.33 a | |
| Zn | T1 | 38.66 ± 1.45 a | 33.66 ± 2.18 a |
| T2 | 38.33 ± 2.02 a | 37.33 ± 3.92 a | |
| T3 | 34.33 ± 1.66 a | 33.66 ± 1.33 a | |
| T4 | 36.33 ± 1.45 a | 31 ± 1.15 a | |
| B | T1 | 62 ± 2.88 ab | 60 ± 4.04 ab |
| T2 | 50.33 ± 2.03 a | 55.66 ± 4.05 a | |
| T3 | 73.33 ± 5.89 b | 82.33 ± 6 b | |
| T4 | 66.66 ± 4.63 ab | 80.33 ± 7.53 ab | |
| NO3- | T1 | 2679.3 ± 167.61 a | 1972.6 ± 183.6 a |
| T2 | 1983.3 ± 265.83 a | 1957 ± 124.85 a | |
| T3 | 1681.3 ± 192.24 a | 1754.6 ± 59.52 a | |
| T4 | 2214.6 ± 443.72 a | 1497.3 ± 208.22 a | |
| NH4- | T1 | 3888 ± 158.75 a | 3549.6 ± 267.12 a |
| T2 | 4511.6 ± 234.9 ab | 3927.6 ± 281.34 a | |
| T3 | 4251 ± 78.07 ab | 3451.6 ± 228.91 a | |
| T4 | 4646.6 ± 140.1 b | 3751 ± 125.48 a | |
Values presented are means ± SE. Means followed by same lowercase letters in the same column are not significantly different (P > 0.05) following comparison using Tukey test. Grey and white colours are used to differentiate columns with micronutrients.
T1= coir + vermiculite + perlite + bark, T2= coir + bark, T3= coir + perlite, T4= coir + vermiculite.
Results on yield, minimum inhibitory concentration and total activities of acetone extracts obtained from aerial parts of hydroponically-cultivated S. aethiopicus following exposure to various substrate combinations and watering regimes.
| Treatment | Yield ± SE (mg) | MIC ± SE (mg/ml) | Total Activity (ml/g) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-days | 5-days | 3-days | 5-days | 3-days | 5-days | |
| T1 (12 H) | 162 ± 19.42 A | 168 ± 21.83 A | 0.625 ± 0.125 A | 0.5 ± 0.125 A | 90.5 ± 9.95 A | 130.76 ± 37.78 A |
| (18 H) | 0.75 ± 0 a | 0.625 ± 0.125 a | 72.13 ± 8.6 a | 103.66 ± 36 a | ||
| T2 (12 H) | 119 ± 61.27 A | 127.3 ± 15.96 A | 0.625 ± 0.125 A | 0.5 ± 0.125 A | 86.64 ± 59.29 A | 97.16 ± 27.05 A |
| (18 H) | 0.75 ± 0 a | 0.625 ± 0.125 a | 52.86 ± 27.2 a | 73.6 ± 15.7 a | ||
| T3 (12 H) | 179 ± 10.17 A | 172.3 ± 13.38 A | 0.5 ± 0.125 A | 0.313 ± 0.06 A | 129.86 ± 20.86 A | 203.2 ± 49.99 A |
| (18 H) | 0.5 ± 0.125 a | 0.375 ± 0 a | 129.86 ± 20.86 a | 153.16 ± 11.89 a | ||
| T4 (12 H) | 104 ± 47.47 A | 165.3 ± 23.88 A | 0.5 ± 0.125 A | 0.375 ± 0 A | 91.4 ± 43.79 A | 120.3 ± 21.2 A |
| (18 H) | 0.625 ± 0.125 a | 0.5 ± 0.125 a | 66.96 ± 34.15 a | 103.4 ± 32.49 a | ||
| Positive control | ||||||
| (12 H) | 0.047 ± 0.01 B | |||||
| (18 H) | 0.047 ± 0.01 b | |||||
| Negative control | ||||||
| (12 H) | No effect | |||||
| (l8 H) | No effect | |||||
Means followed by the same uppercase letters in the same column illustrate no significant difference (P > 0.05) at 12 hours post treatment following comparison using Tukey test
Means followed by same lowercase letters in the same column illustrate no significant difference at 18 hours post treatment.
Results on yield, minimum inhibitory concentration and total activities of acetone extracts obtained from rhizomes of hydroponically- cultivated S. aethiopicus following exposure to various substrate combinations and watering regimes.
| Treatment | Yield ± SE (mg) | MIC ± SE (mg/ml) | Total Activity (ml/g) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-days | 5-days | 3-days | 5-days | 3-days | 5-days | |
| T1 (12 H) | 133 ± 33.3 A | 133 ± 33.3 A | 0.156 ± 0.03 A | 0.125 ± 0.03 A | 296 ± 59.1* A | 354.9 ± 0.3* A |
| (18 H) | 0.313 ± 0.06 a | 0.25 ± 0.06 a | 148. 16 ± 29.6* a | 177.8 ± 2* a | ||
| T2 (12 H) | 166 ± 33.3 A | 133 ± 33.3 A | 0.125 ± 0.03 A | 0.125 ± 0.03 A | 532.1 ± 177.1* A | 413.86 ± 156.2* A |
| (18 H) | 0.375 ± 0 a | 0.313 ± 0.06 a | 148.16 ± 29.6* a | 148.16 ± 29.6* a | ||
| T3 (12 H) | 100 ± 0 A | 100 ± 0 A | 0.078 ± 0.02 A | 0.06 ± 0.02 A | 472.8 ± 118.2* A | 591 ± 118.2* A |
| (18 H) | 0.25 ± 0.06 a | 0.1875 ± 0 a | 148.16 ± 29.6* a | 177.8 ± 2 a | ||
| T4 (12 H) | 100 ± 0 A | 100 ± 0 A | 0.125 ± 0.03 A | 0.109 ± 0.04 A | 295.66 ± 58.9* A | 413.86 ± 156.2* A |
| (18 H) | 0.313 ± 0.06 a | 0.1875 ± 0 a | 118.5 ± 29.6* a | 177.8 ± 2* a | ||
| Positive control | ||||||
| (12 H) | 0.047 ± 0.1 B | |||||
| (18 H) | 0.047 ± 0.1 b | |||||
| Negative control | ||||||
| (12 H) | No effect | |||||
| (18 h) | No effect | |||||
Means followed by the same uppercase letters in the same column illustrate no significant difference (P > 0.05) at 12 hours post treatment following comparison using Tukey test.
Means followed by same lowercase letters in the same column illustrate no significant difference at 18 hours post treatment.
Effect of watering regimes on phenolic compounds profile of extracts of S. aethiopicus aerial parts.
| Compounds | Concentration (ppm) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TR | 3-days interval | TR | 5-days interval | |
| Protocatechuic acid | 4.62 | 2.02 ± 0.44 | 4.61 | 1.59 ± 1.037 |
| Caffeic acid | - | - | 8.12 | 12.33 ± 12.33 |
| Quercetin | 18.76 | 0.23 ± 0.125 | 18.73 | 0.34 ± 0.246 |
| p-hydroxybenzoic acid | 6.32 | 6.09 ± 1.62 | 6.29 | 6.13 ± 4.45 |
| Rutin | 13.3 | 18.23 ± 5.126 | 13.27 | 22.88 ± 18.29 |
| Kaempferol | 21.69 | 0.83 ± 0.236 | 21.67 | 0.66 ± 0.16 |
| Naringenin | 20.75 | 0.06 ± 0.017 | 20.68 | 0.09 ± 0.02 |
| Hesperetin | 18.76 | 0.326 ± 0.06 | 18.73 | 0.33 ± 0.23 |
Data presented are in means ± standard error (n = 3)
(-) represents no phenolic compound isolated, TR= retention time
Effect of watering regimes on phenolic compounds profile of extracts of S. aethiopicus rhizomes
| Compounds | Concentration (ppm) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TR | 3-days interval | TR | 5-days interval | |
| Protocatechuic acid | 4.62 | 1.11 ± 0.58 | 4.63 | 1.57 ± 0.79 |
| Caffeic acid | 8.8 | 4.47 ± 4.47 | - | - |
| p-hydroxybenzoic acid | 6.21 | 12.03 ± 7.83 | 6.19 | 19.87 ± 10.05 |
| Rutin | - | - | 13.3 | 0.13 ± 0.078 |
| Epicatechin | 9.64 | 0.04 ± 0.02 | 9.63 | 0.046 ± 0.02 |
| Naringenin | 20.74 | 0.19 ± 0.025 | 20.72 | 0.25 ± 0.03 |
Data presented are in means ± standard error (n = 3)
(-) represents no phenolic compound isolated, TR= retention time
Figure 2LC-MS profiles (TIC = total ion chromatogram) of acetone extract of S. aethiopicus aerial parts subjected to different watering regimes (3 and 5-days interval).
Figure 3LC-MS profiles (TIC = total ion chromatogram) of acetone extract of S. aethiopicus rhizomes subjected to different watering regimes (3 and 5-days interval).