| Literature DB >> 28480396 |
Víctor Ermilo Arana-Argáez1, Ivan Chan-Zapata1, Jaqueline Canul-Canche1, Karla Fernández-Martín1, Zhelmy Martín-Quintal2, Julio Cesar Torres-Romero3, Tania Isolina Coral-Martínez4, Julio Cesar Lara-Riegos3, Mario Alberto Ramírez-Camacho5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this work was to evaluate the immunomodulatory effect of the methanol extract (MeOH) from Chrysophyllum cainito leaves on the MΦs functions.Entities:
Keywords: Chrysophyllum cainito; Immunomodulation; Macrophages; Phagocytosis; Sapotaceae
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 28480396 PMCID: PMC5411870 DOI: 10.21010/ajtcam.v14i1.20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Afr J Tradit Complement Altern Med ISSN: 2505-0044
Figure 1Effect of MeOH extract on viability of macrophages. Untreated macrophages were cultured in supplemented DMEM media as negative control or C(-). Macrophages were treated with DMSO 100% as positive control or C(+). b) Effect of MeOH extract on viability of Vero cells. Untreated Vero cells were cultured in supplemented DMEM edia as C(-). Vero cells treated with CDDP (1 tg/mL) were used as C(+). The percentages represent the mean ± SD of three independent experiments (n = 3). Letter “a” indicates significative differences in contrast to C(-) and “b” indicates significant differences in contrast to C(+), according to ANOVA test a dose dependent manner and reflected in the phagocytosis percentages 37.71%, 27.60%, 21.14% and 13.29% for 1 t g/mL, 10 t g/mL, 100 t g/mL and 200 t g/mL respectively. The basal followed by Dunnett post hoc tests (P < 0.05). phagocytic activity found (5.43%) was treated as the negative control or C(-). MΦs stimulated with LPS (1tg/mL) were considered as the positive control C(+), with the highest percentage of phagocytic activity (65.20%).
Figure 2Effect of MeOH extract on phagocytosis activity of macrophages. Untreated macrophages were co-cultured in supplemented DMEM media and S. cerevisiae yeasts labelled with PI (1 tg/mL) as C(-). Macrophages were cultured in supplemented DMEM media with DMSO 0.1%, treated with LPS (1 tg/mL) and S. cerevisiae yeasts labelled with PI (1 tg/mL) as C(+). The percentages represent the mean ± SD of three independent experiments (n = 3). Letter “a” indicates significative differences in contrast to C(-), according to ANOVA test followed by Dunnett post hoc tests (P < 0.05).
Figure 3Effect of MeOH extract on NO production of macrophages. Untreated macrophages were cultured in supplemented DMEM media as C(-). Macrophages were cultured in supplemented DMEM media and treated with LPS (1 tg/mL) as C(+). b) Effect of MeOH extract on H2O2 production of macrophages. Untreated macrophages were cultured in supplemented DMEM media as C(-). Macrophages were cultured in supplemented DMEM media and treated with LPS (1 tg/mL) as C(+). The percentages represent the mean ± SD of three independent experiments (n = 3). Letter “a” indicates significative differences in contrast to C(-), according to ANOVA test followed by Dunnett post hoc tests (P < 0.05).
Figure 4Effect of MeOH extract on IL-6 production of macrophages. Untreated macrophages were cultured in supplemented DMEM media as C(-). Macrophages were cultured in supplemented DMEM media and treated with LPS (1 tg/mL) as C(+). b) Effect of MeOH extract on TNF-α production of macrophages. Untreated macrophages were cultured in supplemented DMEM media as C(-). Macrophages were cultured in supplemented DMEM media and treated with LPS (1 μg/mL) as C(+). The percentages represent the mean ± SD of three independent experiments (n = 3). Letter “a” indicates significative differences in contrast to C(-), according to ANOVA test followed by Dunnett post hoc tests (p < 0.05).