| Literature DB >> 28479605 |
Jolanta Krzyczkowska1, Mariola Kozłowska1.
Abstract
This study was aimed at evaluating the capability of Yarrowia lipolytica W29 for the synthesis of lipolytic enzymes in a medium containing plant oils from non-conventional sources with some components displaying bioactivity. Oils from almond, hazelnut, and coriander seeds were obtained by using n-hexane (Soxhlet method) and a chloroform/methanol mixture of solvents (Folch method), and their effect on the growth and lipolytic activity of Y. lipolytica was compared. A comparison of these two extraction methods showed that the extraction with n-hexane was less effective regarding the oil extraction yields than the extraction conducted according to Folch's procedure. The lipolytic activity of the studied yeast was higher in the culture media containing oils extracted with the Soxhlet method than the Folch method but it was lower compared to olive oil medium. Among all oils tested, almond oil extracted with n-hexane was the best inducer of extracellular lipases synthesized by Y. lipolytica. Its lipolytic activity achieved the maximum value of 2.33 U/mL after 48 h of culture. After 24 h of culture, it was close to the value obtained for the medium containing olive oil. Almond oil was a source of oleic and linoleic acids, which may determine differences in the lipolytic activity. The linoleic acid content in almond oil was higher than that found in other oils. When n-hexane was used for extraction, the resultant oils were characterized by lower contents of polyphenols and poorer antioxidative activity.Entities:
Keywords: Folch method; Lipolytic activity; Plant seed oil; Soxhlet method; Yarrowia lipolytica
Year: 2017 PMID: 28479605 PMCID: PMC5397656 DOI: 10.1007/s11746-017-2975-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Am Oil Chem Soc ISSN: 0003-021X Impact factor: 1.849
Fig. 1The growth curves of Y. lipolytica W29 yeast after the addition to a medium of oils extracted from seeds using Soxhlet method (a) and Folch method (b)
Fig. 2A representative graph for dry biomass production by Y. lipolytica W29 on medium enriched with plant seed oils, after 96 h. Each experiment was repeated at least three times (data represent mean ± SD, n = 3)
Lipolytic activity of Y. lipolytica W29 during growth on medium enriched with plant oils
| Extraction method | Sample of plant seed oils | Lipolytic activity of | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 h | 48 h | 72 h | ||
| Soxhlet method | Almond | 2.05 ± 0.23aA | 2.33 ± 0.19aA | 1.78 ± 0.11bA |
| Hazelnut | 1.65 ± 0.13aA | 1.92 ± 0.37aB | 1.22 ± 0.42bB | |
| Coriander | 1,40 ± 0.47aB | 1.03 ± 0.24bC | 1.05 ± 0.40bB | |
| Folch method (chloroform/methanol) | Almond | 0.98 ± 0.10aB | 2.06 ± 0.21bA | 1.86 ± 0.22bA |
| Hazelnut | 0.65 ± 0.01aC | 0.57 ± 0.06bD | 0.52 ± 0.11bC | |
| Coriander | 0.40 ± 0.11aC | 0.90 ± 0.17bC | 0.78 ± 0.15bC | |
| Olive oil | 2.30 ± 0.13aA | 3.05 ± 0.18bE | 2.17 ± 0.25aD | |
| Control sample (YP—medium without oils) | 0.72 ± 0.04aB | 0.81 ± 0.08bC | 0.65 ± 0.15cC | |
Values mean ± standard deviation. Means in the same column with different uppercase letters and in the same row with different lowercase letters are significantly different (p < 0.05)
Fatty acids composition of plant seed oils obtained by Soxhlet and Folch methods
| Fatty acids (%) | Sample of plant oils | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Soxhlet method ( | Folch method (chloroform/methanol) | ||||||
| Almond | Coriander | Hazelnut | Almond | Coriander | Hazelnut | Olive oil | |
| C16:0 | – | – | – | – | 2.01 ± 0.04 | – | 9.31 ± 0.06 |
| C18:0 | 5.58 ± 0.02 | 2.81 ± 0.02 | 6.00 ± 0.04 | 5.98 ± 0.03 | 2.65 ± 0.03 | 6.09 ± 0.02 | 3.84 ± 0.03 |
| C20:0 | – | – | 0.11 ± 0.01 | 0.06 ± 0.01 | – | 0.11 ± 0.01 | 0.39 ± 0.01 |
| SFA | 5.58 ± 0.02 | 2.81 ± 0.02 | 6.11 ± 0.06 | 6.04 ± 0.05 | 4.66 ± 0.07 | 6.20 ± 0.04 | 13.54 ± 0.05 |
| C16:1n-7 | 0.43 ± 0.03 | 0.47 ± 0.04 | 0.26 ± 0.05 | 0.47 ± 0.03 | 0.50 ± 0.02 | 0.26 ± 0.03 | 0.72 ± 0.02 |
| C17:1 | 0.10 ± 0.02 | – | – | 0.13 ± 0.02 | – | – | 0.13 ± 0.01 |
| C18:1n-12 | – | 71.31 ± 0.06 | – | – | 72.55 ± 0.05 | – | – |
| C18:1n-9 | 63.72 ± 0.05 | 3.48 ± 0.02 | 78.09 ± 0.04 | 67.80 ± 0.06 | 5.47 ± 0.04 | 79.42 ± 0.04 | 76.32 ± 0.05 |
| C18:1n-7 | 1.14 ± 0.02 | 0.76 ± 0.04 | 1.42 ± 0.03 | – | 0.74 ± 0.04 | 1.40 ± 0.05 | – |
| C20:1n-9 | – | – | 0.15 ± 0.03 | – | – | 0.16 ± 0.04 | 0.43 ± 0.02 |
| MUFA | 65.39 ± 0.09 | 76.02 ± 0.06 | 79.92 ± 0.07 | 68.40 ± 0.08 | 79.26 ± 0.07 | 81.24 ± 0.06 | 77.60 ± 0.07 |
| C18:2n-6 | 23.03 ± 0.06 | 13.92 ± 0.05 | 11.85 ± 0.04 | 24.82 ± 0.07 | 14.35 ± 0.04 | 12.01 ± 0.05 | 8.21 ± 0.04 |
| C18:3n-3 | – | 0.16 ± 0.02 | 0.10 ± 0.01 | – | 0.17 ± 0.03 | 0.10 ± 0.01 | 0.60 ± 0.02 |
| C22:6n-3 (DHA) | 1.71 ± 0.06 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| C18:2n- | 0.59 ± 0.06 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| PUFA | 25.33 ± 0.08 | 14.08 ± 0.05 | 11.95 ± 0.05 | 24.82 ± 0.07 | 14.52 ± 0.06 | 12.11 ± 0.07 | 8.81 ± 0.04 |
Results are given as the average of triplicate determination ± standard deviation. SFA are total saturated fatty acids, MUFA are total monounsaturated fatty acids, PUFA are total polyunsaturated fatty acids
– not identified
a CLA2 = conjugated linoleic acid (trans-10,cis-12-C18:2n-6)
Total phenolic content and antioxidant activity in plant oils measured by the DPPH method
| Sample of plant seed oils | Total phenolic content (µg GA/g oil) | DPPH methanolic extract (µmol TEAC/g oil). | DPPH plant oil (µmol TEAC/g oil) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Soxhlet method ( | |||
| Almond | 14.23 ± 0.98a | 0.21 ± 0.03a | 0.42 ± 0.04a |
| Coriander | 165.08 ± 7.07b | 1.16 ± 0.13e | 2.15 ± 0.18c |
| Hazelnut | 19.12 ± 1.33a | 0.53 ± 0.09d | 3.00 ± 0.25d |
| Folch method (chloroform/methanol) | |||
| Almond | 19.34 ± 5.07a | 0.36 ± 0.06b | 0.46 ± 0.07a |
| Coriander | 210.12 ± 8.40c | 3.51 ± 0.37f | 5.16 ± 0.24e |
| Hazelnut | 15.46 ± 0.82a | 0.45 ± 0.08c | 1.38 ± 0.16b |
| Olive oil | 235.11 ± 0.72c | 1.55 ± 0.21e | 2.67 ± 0.23cd |
Results are given as the average of triplicate determination ± standard deviation. Means with different letters in the same column differ significantly, p < 0.05