Hongguang Wu1, Zhixiang Wu1, Ping Li2, Qian Cong2, Rongrong Chen3, Wenrui Xu4, Soma Biswas2, Huijuan Liu1, Xuechun Xia2, Shanshan Li5, Weiwei Hu5, Zhenlin Zhang5, Samy L Habib6, Lingli Zhang7, Jun Zou7, Hongbing Zhang3, Weihong Zhang8, Baojie Li9. 1. Bio-X-Renji Hospital Research Center, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200127, China; Key Laboratory for the Genetics of Developmental and Neuropsychiatric Disorders, Bio-X Institutes, Ministry of Education, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China. 2. Key Laboratory for the Genetics of Developmental and Neuropsychiatric Disorders, Bio-X Institutes, Ministry of Education, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China. 3. State Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Biology, Department of Physiology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China. 4. Department of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China. 5. Research Unit, Department of Osteoporosis and Bone Diseases, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated with Sixth People's Hospital, 600 Yishan Road, Shanghai 200233, China. 6. Department of Cellular and Structural Biology, South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA. 7. Scientific Research Department, Shanghai University of Sport, 399 Changhai Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai, 200438, China. 8. Department of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China. Electronic address: zhangweihong@pumch.cn. 9. Bio-X-Renji Hospital Research Center, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200127, China; Key Laboratory for the Genetics of Developmental and Neuropsychiatric Disorders, Bio-X Institutes, Ministry of Education, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China; Scientific Research Department, Shanghai University of Sport, 399 Changhai Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai, 200438, China. Electronic address: libj@sjtu.edu.cn.
Abstract
The bone size and quality, acquired during adolescent growth under the influence of anabolic hormones, growth factors, and nutrients, determine the height and bone stability and forecast osteoporosis risks in late life. Yet bone size and quality control mechanisms remain enigmatic. To study the roles of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling, sensor of growth factors and nutrients, in bone size and quality regulation, we ablated Tsc1, a suppressor of mTOR, in mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs), monocytes, or their progenies osteoblasts and osteoclasts. mTOR activation in MSCs, but much less in osteoblasts, increased bone width and mass due to MSC hyperproliferation, but decreased bone length and mineral contents due to defective MSC differentiation. mTOR activation promotes bone mineral accretion by inhibiting osteoclast differentiation and activity directly or via coupling with MSCs. Tuberous sclerosis complex patient studies confirmed these findings. Thus, mTOR regulates bone size via MSCs and bone quality by suppressing catabolic activities of osteoclasts.
The bone size and quality, acquired during adolescent growth under the influence of anabolic hormones, growth factors, and nutrients, determine the height and bone stability and forecast osteoporosis risks in late life. Yet bone size and quality control mechanisms remain enigmatic. To study the roles of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling, sensor of growth factors and nutrients, in bone size and quality regulation, we ablated Tsc1, a suppressor of mTOR, in mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs), monocytes, or their progenies osteoblasts and osteoclasts. mTOR activation in MSCs, but much less in osteoblasts, increased bone width and mass due to MSC hyperproliferation, but decreased bone length and mineral contents due to defective MSC differentiation. mTOR activation promotes bone mineral accretion by inhibiting osteoclast differentiation and activity directly or via coupling with MSCs. Tuberous sclerosis complexpatient studies confirmed these findings. Thus, mTOR regulates bone size via MSCs and bone quality by suppressing catabolic activities of osteoclasts.
The organ size, determined by the number and size of cells in the organ, is regulated by genetic and environmental factors (Csibi and Blenis, 2012, Penzo-Mendez and Stanger, 2015). The size of bones determines the height, build, and stability of the skeleton, while the quality of bones, defined by bone matrix and mineral contents and microstructures, determines the bone strength (Whiting et al., 2004). It is estimated that peak bone mass accounts for 60% of the risk of osteoporosis (Baxter-Jones et al., 2011). The maximal bone size, mass, and strength are reached in humans at the age of 23–24 years and in mice at 10–12 weeks (Bonjour and Chevalley, 2014, Farr and Khosla, 2015). Bone growth and remodeling are carried out by coordinated osteoblastic bone formation and osteoclastic bone resorption (Henriksen et al., 2014, Karsenty et al., 2009). Osteoblasts (OBs) are derived from bone marrow-mesenchymal stromal cells (BM-MSCs), which can self-renew and differentiate into OBs, chondrocytes, or adipocytes, whereas osteoclasts (OCs) are derived from monocytes (Edwards and Mundy, 2011, Harada and Rodan, 2003, Lacey et al., 2012). Proliferation of stem cells and progenitors increases the pool of OBs or OCs, while proper maturation determines the activities of these cells. Bone size, mass, and quality can be regulated by the growth hormone-insulin growth factor (IGF) axis, nutrition, steroid hormones, vitamin D, and mechanical stimuli (Bonjour and Chevalley, 2014, Hendrickx et al., 2015, Rosello-Diez and Joyner, 2015, Zemel, 2013). It is generally believed that IGFs promote OB and chondrocyte proliferation and differentiation, which mediate the anabolic effects of IGFs on bone growth (Callewaert et al., 2010, Canalis, 2009, Yakar et al., 2010).The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway is the sensor of growth factors, including IGF1, macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF), and nutrients (Hay and Sonenberg, 2004, Laplante and Sabatini, 2012), and is expected to play critical roles in bone growth spurt during adolescence. Activated mTOR increases global protein synthesis to promote cell proliferation (Jewell et al., 2013, Johnson et al., 2013). In humans, tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) patients carry mutations in one allele of TSC1 or TSC2, encoding negative regulators of mTOR, and they develop benign tumors in multiple organs due to loss of heterozygosity of the TSC genes (Laplante and Sabatini, 2012). In addition, TSCpatients develop focal sclerotic bone lesions (Avila et al., 2010, Li et al., 2015, Rafal et al., 2013, Umeoka et al., 2008). In mouse, mTor ablation or mTOR activation by ablation of Tsc1 or Tsc2 causes embryonic or neonatal lethality (Laplante and Sabatini, 2012). Studies of mice with Tsc1 or Tsc2 deleted in committed OBs or chondrocytes established roles for mTOR signaling in bone mass accrual and endochondral ossification (Huang et al., 2015, Riddle et al., 2014), with the cartilage studies being limited to embryos or newborns due to survival problems of the mice (Chen and Long, 2014, Yan et al., 2016). Yet, the roles for mTOR signaling in bone size and quality control during adolescent growth, especially from the angle of the stem cells of the skeleton, remain largely unknown.Here, we ablated Tsc1 in BM-MSCs and monocytes, as well as in their progenies, OBs and OCs, and found that mTOR regulates bone size in length and width by coordinating MSC proliferation and differentiation, and bone quality by suppressing osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption in cell-autonomous manners and by regulating the expression of OPG and RANKL by MSCs. The bone phenotypes induced by Tsc1 ablation mediated by Prx1-Cre or LysM-Cre were largely rescued by treatment with rapamycin, an mTOR inhibitor. Analysis of the TSCpatients from the Han Chinese population revealed that more than 90% of the patients show increased focal bone density, which is associated with a decrease in bone resorption marker and an increase in bone formation marker. These findings thus uncover multifaceted roles for mTOR signaling in regulating bone size and quality, and underscore the decisive contribution of suppression of bone resorption to the achievement of peak bone mineral contents.
Results
The mTOR Pathway Was Activated in Multiple Locations of the Bone during Adolescent Growth
mTOR can be activated by growth factors and nutrients. We found that in femurs of 1-day-old, 4-week-old, or 8-week-old mice, mTOR activation, manifested by S6 phosphorylation, was detectable in the proliferation and prehypertrophic zones of the growth plate (Figures 1A–1C), which are involved in longitudinal bone growth, the region underneath the growth plate, where trabecular bones are formed, and the periosteal and endosteal surfaces, which are responsible for bone radial growth (Figures 1A–1C). Staining of both p-S6 and Col2 or Osx confirmed that mTOR activation occurred in chondrocytes and OBs (Figure S1A). p-S6 signals were reduced in 8-week-old mouse bones compared with those in 1-day-old and 4-week-old mice, suggesting that mTOR is highly activated during adolescent growth. Moreover, starvation inhibited mTOR activation, whereas feeding activated mTOR on mouse bone sections (Figures 1D–1F), confirming that food intake or nutrients can activate mTOR in the bone.
Figure 1
mTOR Was Activated in the Bone during Adolescent Growth and by Feeding
(A–C) Immuno-staining of p-S6 on bone sections of 1-day-old (A), 4-week-old (B), or 8-week-old mice (C). The femur bones were decalcified and embedded in paraffin. Antibodies against p-S6 and secondary antibodies conjugated with horseradish peroxidase were used to detect the signal.
(D–F) Starvation inhibited mTOR activation, whereas feeding activated mTOR on bone sections. P1 pups were starved overnight (D) by separating from the mother and then euthanized 2 hr (E) or 8 hr (F) after feeding. The femur bones were frozen sectioned and stained for p-S6. Scale bars, 200 μm (A–F left panels) and 50 μm (A–F right panels).
mTOR Was Activated in the Bone during Adolescent Growth and by Feeding(A–C) Immuno-staining of p-S6 on bone sections of 1-day-old (A), 4-week-old (B), or 8-week-old mice (C). The femur bones were decalcified and embedded in paraffin. Antibodies against p-S6 and secondary antibodies conjugated with horseradish peroxidase were used to detect the signal.(D–F) Starvation inhibited mTOR activation, whereas feeding activated mTOR on bone sections. P1 pups were starved overnight (D) by separating from the mother and then euthanized 2 hr (E) or 8 hr (F) after feeding. The femur bones were frozen sectioned and stained for p-S6. Scale bars, 200 μm (A–F left panels) and 50 μm (A–F right panels).
Prx1-Cre; Tsc1 Mice Showed Shorter and Thicker Long Bones and Joint Defects
It has been reported that mTor ablation in BM-MSCs causes mouse neonatal lethality (Chen and Long, 2014). To further test the physiological function of mTOR activation in bone growth, we deleted Tsc1 in BM-MSCs by crossing floxed Tsc1mice with Prx1-Cre mice (Figure S1B) (Logan et al., 2002, Meikle et al., 2007). Our previous studies have confirmed that Prx1 marks stromal cells with tri-lineage differentiation potentials and labels cells at the growth plate, trabecular region, and periosteal surface (Cong et al., 2016). Western blot and immunohistochemical analysis confirmed that Tsc1 was largely deleted in BM-MSC cultures and on bone sections, leading to an increase in p-S6 (Figures S1C and S1D). The Tsc1-deficientmice were born at the expected Mendelian ratio and showed unaltered body weight and length compared with wild-type (WT) littermates (Figure S1E).Micro-computed tomography (CT) analysis showed that the length of the long bones of the Tsc1-deficientmice was decreased compared with control littermates of the same gender at 2.5 months of age (Figures 2A and 2B), when peak bone mass is achieved in mice. Histological analysis revealed that the mutant mice showed an increase in the height of growth plates and the size of chondrocytes compared with control mice (Figure 2C). The chondrocyte proliferation zone and hypertrophy zone were not clearly separated in the mutant mice (Figure 2C), likely due to disruption of the coordination between chondrocyte proliferation and differentiation. The mutant mice also showed a defect in articular cartilage and joint formation (Figure 2D). A similar perichondrium and cartilage anomaly has been reported in hereditary multiple exostoses patients, a disorder caused by mutations in EXT1 and EXT2 (Huegel et al., 2013, Jones et al., 2010), yet we found that mTOR activation did not alter the protein levels of EXT1 or EXT2 in MSCs, chondrocytes, or cartilage (Figures S2A–S2C).
Figure 2
Ablation of Tsc1 in Prx1+ MSCs but Not in Dermo1+ or Osx+ OBs Led to Shortened but Broadened Limbs and Joint Deformation
(A) Micro-CT images of the femur bones and the vertebrae (L3 and L4) of 2.5-month-old Prx1-Cre; Tsc1, Dermo1-Cre; Tsc1, and Osx-Cre; Tsc1 mice. Upper panel, coronal plane of femur; middle panel, transverse plane of femur; bottom panel, vertebrae.
(B) Quantitation data showed that the length of Prx1-Cre; Tsc1 mouse long bones was decreased compared with control mice. N = 15 mice.
(C) H&E staining of the growth plates of 2.5-month-old Prx1-Cre; Tsc1 and control mouse femur bones. Right panel: quantitation data of the diameter of chondrocytes. Scale bars, 200 μm (left panel) and 20 μm (middle panel). N = 3 mice (6 views each).
(D) H&E staining of the sections of the knee joint of Prx1-Cre; Tsc1 and control mice. Scale bars, 200 μm (upper panel) and 20 μm (lower panel).
(E) Quantitation data showed that the width of the Prx1-Cre; Tsc1 mouse femur bones was increased compared with control mice. N = 6 mice.
(F) Quantitation data showed that the width of growth plates of Prx1-Cre; Tsc1 mouse femur bones was increased compared with control mice. N = 6 mice.
Ablation of Tsc1 in Prx1+ MSCs but Not in Dermo1+ or Osx+ OBs Led to Shortened but Broadened Limbs and Joint Deformation(A) Micro-CT images of the femur bones and the vertebrae (L3 and L4) of 2.5-month-old Prx1-Cre; Tsc1, Dermo1-Cre; Tsc1, and Osx-Cre; Tsc1mice. Upper panel, coronal plane of femur; middle panel, transverse plane of femur; bottom panel, vertebrae.(B) Quantitation data showed that the length of Prx1-Cre; Tsc1mouse long bones was decreased compared with control mice. N = 15 mice.(C) H&E staining of the growth plates of 2.5-month-old Prx1-Cre; Tsc1 and control mouse femur bones. Right panel: quantitation data of the diameter of chondrocytes. Scale bars, 200 μm (left panel) and 20 μm (middle panel). N = 3 mice (6 views each).(D) H&E staining of the sections of the knee joint of Prx1-Cre; Tsc1 and control mice. Scale bars, 200 μm (upper panel) and 20 μm (lower panel).(E) Quantitation data showed that the width of the Prx1-Cre; Tsc1mouse femur bones was increased compared with control mice. N = 6 mice.(F) Quantitation data showed that the width of growth plates of Prx1-Cre; Tsc1mouse femur bones was increased compared with control mice. N = 6 mice.Error bars represent the SD. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01.On the other hand, the mutant mice showed an increase in the width of femurs and physeal growth plate (Figures 2A, 2E, and 2F). It is believed that, in addition to periosteal bone apposition, the width of the growth plate is an important factor determining the width of long bones (Wang et al., 2011). These results indicate that TSC1 plays an important role in bone growth in both length and width, although in opposed ways.It has been reported that TSC1 also activates mTOR-independent pathways such as RAF and NOTCH. We found that in BM-MSCs, Tsc1 deletion did not affect the protein levels of RAF or the activation of its downstream ERK kinases (Figure S2D). Tsc1 deficiency slightly increased the protein levels of NOTCH1 (Figure S2D), which may mediate the effect of mTOR activation on OB differentiation (Huang et al., 2015). To determine whether the skeletal phenotypes observed in Prx1-Cre; Tsc1mice are caused by mTOR activation, we treated the mutant and control mice with rapamycin and found that rapamycin inhibited skeletal growth in WT mice (Figures S3A–S3M), as reported previously (Yan et al., 2016). Moreover, rapamycin largely rescued the skeletal phenotypes including bone width/length, bone mass, trabecular bone number, trabecular separation, the growth plate height, the size of chondrocytes, and the joint development anomaly in Prx1-Cre; Tsc1mice (Figures S3A–S3M). These results indicate that mTOR signaling downstream of TSC1 deficiency plays an important role in bone growth.The change in bone size and joint formation defects observed in Prx1-Cre; Tsc1mice are not reported in mice with Tsc1 or Tsc2 ablated in OBs (Chen and Long, 2014, Huang et al., 2015, Riddle et al., 2014). Moreover, these defects were not obvious in Prx1-Cre; Tsc1 embryos or p1 newborn mice. The Prx1-Cre; Tsc1embryonic skeletons (E18.5) appeared normal and the length of the long bones of day 1 pups was not significantly affected (Figures S4A and S4B). The p1 pups did not develop the joint problem either (Figure S4C). These results suggest that the bone size alteration and joint defects observed in Prx1-Cre; Tsc1 adult mice are developed during adolescent growth.
Prx1-Cre; Tsc1 Mice Showed Increased Bone Volume but Decreased Bone Mineralization
Micro-CT analyses revealed that the mutant mice showed an increase in the thickness of cortical bones and the volume and thickness of trabecular bones (Figures 3A–3C), accompanied by a decrease in the number of trabecular bones and bone separation (Figures 3D and 3E). Bone histomorphometry revealed that the 2.5-month-old mice showed an increase in bone formation rate but a decrease in bone mineralization rate (Figures 3F and 3G), suggesting that bone mineralization might be impeded even though bone formation is increased.
Figure 3
Ablation of Tsc1 in MSCs Increased Bone Mass but Reduced Bone Quality
(A) Ablation of Tsc1 in Prx1+ MSCs increased the cortical thickness of femur bones to a greater extent than ablation of Tsc1 in Dermo1+ or Osx+ OBs. N = 4 mice.
(B) Micro-CT analysis revealed that Prx1-Cre; Tsc1 mice showed a greater increase in trabecular bone volume than Dermo1-Cre; Tsc1 and Osx-Cre; Tsc1 mice. N = 4 mice.
(C–G) Prx1-Cre; Tsc1 mice showed an increase in thickness (C) and the number (D), and a decrease in separation (E) of trabecular bones, and an increase in bone formation rate (BFR) (F) and mineral apposition rate (MAR) (G). N = 4 mice.
(H) Prx1-Cre; Tsc1 mice femur cortical bones appeared to be porous, some of which were stained positive for CD31. Black arrow, pores; red arrow, blood vessel. Scale bars, 200 μm (upper panel) and 50 μm (lower panel).
(I) von Kossa staining of Prx1-Cre; Tsc1 and control littermates showed that the mineralization was impeded in the mutant mouse bones. Scale bar, 200 μm.
(J) Masson staining of Prx1-Cre; Tsc1 and control littermates showed that the mineralization was impeded in the mutant mouse bones. Scale bar, 50 μm.
(K) Prx1-Cre; Tsc1 mice showed reduced bone strength, judged by the three-point bending experiment results. N = 4 mice.
Ablation of Tsc1 in MSCs Increased Bone Mass but Reduced Bone Quality(A) Ablation of Tsc1 in Prx1+ MSCs increased the cortical thickness of femur bones to a greater extent than ablation of Tsc1 in Dermo1+ or Osx+ OBs. N = 4 mice.(B) Micro-CT analysis revealed that Prx1-Cre; Tsc1mice showed a greater increase in trabecular bone volume than Dermo1-Cre; Tsc1 and Osx-Cre; Tsc1mice. N = 4 mice.(C–G) Prx1-Cre; Tsc1mice showed an increase in thickness (C) and the number (D), and a decrease in separation (E) of trabecular bones, and an increase in bone formation rate (BFR) (F) and mineral apposition rate (MAR) (G). N = 4 mice.(H) Prx1-Cre; Tsc1mice femur cortical bones appeared to be porous, some of which were stained positive for CD31. Black arrow, pores; red arrow, blood vessel. Scale bars, 200 μm (upper panel) and 50 μm (lower panel).(I) von Kossa staining of Prx1-Cre; Tsc1 and control littermates showed that the mineralization was impeded in the mutant mouse bones. Scale bar, 200 μm.(J) Masson staining of Prx1-Cre; Tsc1 and control littermates showed that the mineralization was impeded in the mutant mouse bones. Scale bar, 50 μm.(K) Prx1-Cre; Tsc1mice showed reduced bone strength, judged by the three-point bending experiment results. N = 4 mice.Error bars represent the SD. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01.We found that the cortical bones appeared to have quality problems. Firstly, they were porous, accompanied by an increase in the number of blood vessels, as CD31, a marker for endothelial cells, could stain these pores (Figure 3H). Secondly, von Kossa staining and H&E staining showed that the mutant bone was rich in osteoids that were not fully mineralized (Figures 3I and 3J). The mineralization defects are similar to what have been reported in mice with Tsc1 or Tsc2 ablated in OBs, which were rescued by rapamycin treatment (Chen and Long, 2014, Huang et al., 2015, Riddle et al., 2014). Thirdly, the bones were more fragile than WT bones, based on three-point bending experiments (Figure 3K). These results, taken together, indicate that mTOR activation by ablation of Tsc1 in Prx1+ MSCs inhibits bone mineralization, disrupts bone microstructure, and reduces bone strength, thus lowering the bone quality.
mTOR Activation Regulated Bone Size and Mass Mainly via MSCs but Not OBs
To determine the contributions of mTOR signaling in MSCs and OBs to the bone phenotypes observed in Prx1-Cre; Tsc1mice, we ablated Tsc1 in Dermo1+ MSCs and Osx+ OBs, respectively. Dermo1 is believed to be expressed in BM-MSCs after Prx1, while Osx is expressed in committed OBs after Runx2 (Figure S1B) (Rodda and McMahon, 2006, Yu et al., 2003). Western blot analysis of BM-MSCs and differentiated OB cultures confirmed that Tsc1 was largely deleted, leading to an increase in p-S6 (Figure S4D). We found that these two mouse lines showed normal body weight and body length (Figures S4E and S4F).X-ray imaging analyses revealed that unlike Prx1-Cre; Tsc1mice, the length and the width of the femurs and the growth plates were not significantly altered in Dermo1-Cre; Tsc1mice or Osx-Cre; Tsc1mice compared with their control littermates (Figures 2A and S4G and data not shown). These two mouse lines showed an increase in trabecular bone volume and cortical bone thickness, with the increase in Dermo1-Cre; Tsc1mice being greater than that in Osx-Cre; Tsc1mice (Figures 3A, 3B, and S4H–S4J). The increase in trabecular bone volume and cortical bone thickness in these two mouse lines were much less than those of Prx1-Cre; Tsc1mice (Figures 2A, 3A, and 3B). These results collectively suggest that mTOR signaling regulates trabecular and cortical bone mass mainly via MSCs.We also compared the vertebrae (L3 and L4) of the three Tsc1-deficientmouse lines against their respective control littermates using micro-CT, and found that the bone mineral contents were not significantly altered in Prx1-Cre; Tsc1mice or Osx-Cre; Tsc1mice, whereas Dermo1-Cre; Tsc1mice showed a modest increase in bone mineral contents (Figure 2A).
Tsc1 Deficiency Increased the BM-MSC Pool but Inhibited MSC Differentiation
We found that on bone sections of Prx1-Cre; Tsc1mice, the number of Ki67-positive cells was greatly increased in the growth plate (Figures 4A and S4H). The heights of the Ki67-positive proliferation zone and the Col10-positive hypertrophic zone were increased (Figure S4H), suggesting that the balance between proliferation and differentiation of chondrocyte progenitors were disrupted by Tsc1 ablation. In addition, the number of OBs per bone surface was significantly increased (Figure 4B). Prx1-Cre; Tsc1mouse bone marrow also contained an increased number of colony-forming units, an indicator of the number of MSCs (Figure 4C), suggesting that the pool of MSCs was expanded.
Figure 4
Tsc1 MSCs Showed Increased Proliferation, but Defective Osteogenic and Chondrogenic Differentiation
(A) Ki67 staining of femur bones of Prx1-Cre; Tsc1 and control mice. Right panel: quantitation data. Scale bars, 200 μm (left panel) and 50 μm (middle panel). N = 3 mice (6 views each).
(B) Prx1-Cre; Tsc1 mice showed an increase in the number of OBs in the trabecular region. N = 8 mice.
(C) Prx1-Cre; Tsc1 mice showed an increase in the number of bone marrow colony-forming units (CFU). Right panel: quantitation data. N = 4 independent experiments.
(D) Prx1-Cre; Tsc1 BM-MSCs showed a decrease in OB differentiation, judged by ALP and von Kossa staining, a decrease in chondrocyte differentiation, judged by Alcian blue staining, but normal adipocyte differentiation. Scale bar, 100 μm.
(E) qPCR results revealed that Tsc1 MSCs showed a decrease in the expression of osteogenic and chondrogenic markers. N = 4 independent experiments.
(F) Tsc1 MSCs showed decreased activation of β-catenin. BM-MSCs were isolated from Prx1-Cre; Tsc1 and control mice, cultured for 3 days, and then harvested for western blot analysis.
Tsc1 MSCs Showed Increased Proliferation, but Defective Osteogenic and Chondrogenic Differentiation(A) Ki67 staining of femur bones of Prx1-Cre; Tsc1 and control mice. Right panel: quantitation data. Scale bars, 200 μm (left panel) and 50 μm (middle panel). N = 3 mice (6 views each).(B) Prx1-Cre; Tsc1mice showed an increase in the number of OBs in the trabecular region. N = 8 mice.(C) Prx1-Cre; Tsc1mice showed an increase in the number of bone marrow colony-forming units (CFU). Right panel: quantitation data. N = 4 independent experiments.(D) Prx1-Cre; Tsc1 BM-MSCs showed a decrease in OB differentiation, judged by ALP and von Kossa staining, a decrease in chondrocyte differentiation, judged by Alcian blue staining, but normal adipocyte differentiation. Scale bar, 100 μm.(E) qPCR results revealed that Tsc1 MSCs showed a decrease in the expression of osteogenic and chondrogenic markers. N = 4 independent experiments.(F) Tsc1 MSCs showed decreased activation of β-catenin. BM-MSCs were isolated from Prx1-Cre; Tsc1 and control mice, cultured for 3 days, and then harvested for western blot analysis.Error bars represent the SD. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01.Tsc1 BM-MSCs showed a defect in chondrogenic differentiation, manifested by a decrease in Alcian blue staining and expression of chondrocyte marker Sox9, a defect in OB differentiation, manifested by a decrease in the expression of ALP and OB markers such as Runx2, Osx, and ColIα, and mineralization, without affecting MSC adipogenesis (Figures 4D and 4E). Therefore, Tsc1 deficiency disrupted the balance between MSC proliferation and differentiation.A previous study has shown that depletion of Tsc1 in differentiated chondrocyte by Col2-Cre led to a defect in chondrocyte differentiation (Yan et al., 2016), which was shown to be mediated by an altered PTHrP-IHH loop (Kronenberg, 2006, Lee et al., 1995). We also found that Tsc1 depletion resulted in an increase in the mRNA levels of Pthrp, but not Ihh, in MSCs (Figure S2E). Our results support the notion that mTOR regulates chondrocyte differentiation via PTHrP (Yan et al., 2016).We also looked at the major signaling pathways that control MSC osteogenic differentiation and found that Tsc1 deficiency in MSCs decreased β-catenin activation without significantly affecting the activation of Smad1/5/8 or p38 MAPK (Figures 4F and S2F). Since Wnt-β-catenin is a master regulator of OB differentiation, these results suggest that mTOR may regulate MSC osteogenic differentiation via compromising the Wnt-β-catenin pathway (Huang et al., 2015). We also checked the β-catenin-independent pathways activated by Wnt molecules such as Wnt5a (Yang et al., 2003, Gao et al., 2011), and found that Tsc1 deletion led to a modest decrease in JNK activation, a downstream signaling molecule of Wnt5a, without affecting the expression of Wnt5a (Figures S2G and S2H). The effects of the non-canonical Wnt pathways warrant further investigation.
Ablation of Tsc1 in MSCs but Not OBs Showed Suppressed Osteoclastogenesis and Bone Resorption
We then stained for TRAP-positive OCs on femur bones and found that Prx1-Cre; Tsc1mice showed a decreased number of OCs (Figure 5A). Bone histomorphometry analysis confirmed that the mutant mice showed a decrease in bone erosion surface and the number of OCs, which were rescued by rapamycin treatment (Figures 5B and 5C and data not shown). Furthermore, Prx1-Cre; Tsc1mice showed a decrease in urine deoxypyridinoline (DPD) levels, an in vivo bone resorption marker (Figure 5D). On the other hand, Dermo1-Cre; Tsc1 and Osx-Cre; Tsc1mouse lines did not show a change in the number of TRAP-positive OCs (Figure 5A). These results indicate that Tsc1 deficiency in MSCs, but not in OBs, suppresses osteoclastogenesis, which may help to promote bone mineral accrual.
Figure 5
Ablation of Tsc1 in Prx1+ MSCs but Not in Dermo1+ or Osx+ OBs Suppressed Osteoclastogenesis and Bone Resorption
(A) TRAP staining of bone sections revealed that femurs of Prx1-Cre; Tsc1 mice, but not Dermo1-Cre; Tsc1 or Osx-Cre; Tsc1 mice showed a decrease in the number of OCs in vivo. Scale bar, 50 μm. Data are from three independent experiments.
(B–D) Prx1-Cre; Tsc1 mice showed a decrease in bone erosion surface (B) (N = 8 mice), the number of OCs (C) (N = 8 mice), and the levels of urine DPD (D) (N = 4 mice).
(E) Tsc1 MSCs showed altered expression of Rankl, M-Csf, and Opg. N = 4 independent experiments.
Ablation of Tsc1 in Prx1+ MSCs but Not in Dermo1+ or Osx+ OBs Suppressed Osteoclastogenesis and Bone Resorption(A) TRAP staining of bone sections revealed that femurs of Prx1-Cre; Tsc1mice, but not Dermo1-Cre; Tsc1 or Osx-Cre; Tsc1mice showed a decrease in the number of OCs in vivo. Scale bar, 50 μm. Data are from three independent experiments.(B–D) Prx1-Cre; Tsc1mice showed a decrease in bone erosion surface (B) (N = 8 mice), the number of OCs (C) (N = 8 mice), and the levels of urine DPD (D) (N = 4 mice).(E) Tsc1 MSCs showed altered expression of Rankl, M-Csf, and Opg. N = 4 independent experiments.Error bars represent the SD. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01.To understand how mTOR signaling regulates the coupling between MSCs and osteoclastogenesis, we analyzed the mRNA levels of Rankl, Opg, and M-Csf in Tsc1 and control BM-MSCs and found that Tsc1 deficiency greatly increased the expression of Opg and decreased the expression of Rankl (Figure 5E). Similar results were obtained from immuno-staining for RNAKL and OPG on bone sections and measurement of RANKL and OPG in the bone marrow (Figures S5A and S5B). These results suggest that mTOR in BM-MSCs might regulate OPG and RANKL expression to suppress osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption. In addition, M-Csf expression was upregulated in Tsc1-deficient MSCs (Figure 5E). We showed that decreased M-CSF production by MSCs compromised proliferation of OC progenitor cells in co-culture experiments (Figure S5C).
Ablation of Tsc1 in Monocytes or OCs Increased Bone Mineral Contents
The above studies showed that mTOR signaling in MSCs regulated bone growth in size and volume via MSCs and that Tsc1 deletion in MSCs also led to a decrease in bone mineralization. Although mTOR activation in MSCs regulates the expression of OPG and RANKL to suppress bone resorption and increase bone mineral contents, this turns out to be inadequate to keep up with bone growth in size.We then ablated Tsc1 in monocytes, the OC progenitors, using LysM-Cre mice (Figure S1B) (Clausen et al., 1999), to test whether mTOR signaling in monocytes might affect adolescent bone mineral content accretion (Figure S6A). The mutant mice were born at the Mendelian ratio and they had unaltered body weight, body length, and femur radius and length (Figures 6A and 6B and data not shown).
Figure 6
Ablation of Tsc1 in LysM+ Monocytes or Ctsk+ OCs Led to a Decrease in Bone Resorption
(A) Micro-CT images of the femur bones and the vertebrae (L3 and L4) of LysM-Cre; Tsc1 mice, Ctsk-Cre; Tsc1 mice, and their respective control mice. N = 3 mice.
(B) The length of femur bones of LysM-Cre; Tsc1 mice (left panel) and Ctsk-Cre;Tsc1 mice (right panel) were not altered compared with those of control mice. N = 6 mice.
(C) LysM-Cre; Tsc1 mice (upper panel) and Ctsk-Cre; Tsc1 mice (lower panel) showed an increase in the trabecular bone volume. Right panel: quantitation data. N = 4 mice.
(D) LysM-Cre; Tsc1 mice (left panel) and Ctsk-Cre; Tsc1 mice (right panel) showed an increase in the number of trabecular bones. N = 4 mice.
(E) LysM-Cre; Tsc1 mice (left panel) showed normal trabecular thickness, whereas Ctsk-Cre; Tsc1 mice (right panel) showed an increase in the thickness of trabecular bones. N = 4 mice.
(F) LysM-Cre; Tsc1 mice (left panel) showed normal numbers of OCs, whereas Ctsk-Cre;Tsc1 mice (right panel) showed an increase in the numbers of OCs. N = 6 mice.
(G) TRAP staining on bone sections revealed that femurs of LysM-Cre; Tsc1 mice showed normal number of TRAP-positive cells, whereas Ctsk-Cre; Tsc1 mice showed an increase in the number of TRAP-positive cells. Scale bar, 50 μm.
(H) LysM-Cre;Tsc1 and Ctsk-Cre;Tsc1 mice showed a decrease in the levels of urine DPD levels (upper panel) and serum levels of CTX (upper panel). N = 6 mice.
Ablation of Tsc1 in LysM+ Monocytes or Ctsk+ OCs Led to a Decrease in Bone Resorption(A) Micro-CT images of the femur bones and the vertebrae (L3 and L4) of LysM-Cre; Tsc1mice, Ctsk-Cre; Tsc1mice, and their respective control mice. N = 3 mice.(B) The length of femur bones of LysM-Cre; Tsc1mice (left panel) and Ctsk-Cre;Tsc1mice (right panel) were not altered compared with those of control mice. N = 6 mice.(C) LysM-Cre; Tsc1mice (upper panel) and Ctsk-Cre; Tsc1mice (lower panel) showed an increase in the trabecular bone volume. Right panel: quantitation data. N = 4 mice.(D) LysM-Cre; Tsc1mice (left panel) and Ctsk-Cre; Tsc1mice (right panel) showed an increase in the number of trabecular bones. N = 4 mice.(E) LysM-Cre; Tsc1mice (left panel) showed normal trabecular thickness, whereas Ctsk-Cre; Tsc1mice (right panel) showed an increase in the thickness of trabecular bones. N = 4 mice.(F) LysM-Cre; Tsc1mice (left panel) showed normal numbers of OCs, whereas Ctsk-Cre;Tsc1mice (right panel) showed an increase in the numbers of OCs. N = 6 mice.(G) TRAP staining on bone sections revealed that femurs of LysM-Cre; Tsc1mice showed normal number of TRAP-positive cells, whereas Ctsk-Cre; Tsc1mice showed an increase in the number of TRAP-positive cells. Scale bar, 50 μm.(H) LysM-Cre;Tsc1 and Ctsk-Cre;Tsc1mice showed a decrease in the levels of urine DPD levels (upper panel) and serum levels of CTX (upper panel). N = 6 mice.Error bars represent the SD. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01.Micro-CT analyses revealed that the mutant mouse femur displayed an increase in trabecular bone mass (Figures 6A–6E). The osteopetrotic phenotypes were largely rescued by inhibition of mTORC1 with rapamycin (Figures 6C and S6B). Bone histomorphometry analysis confirmed these findings and revealed that LysM-Cre; Tsc1mice exhibited normal bone formation rate, bone mineralization rate, and the numbers of OCs in vivo (Figure 6F and data not shown). TRAP staining of bone sections confirmed that the numbers of OCs were similar between LysM-Cre; Tsc1 and control mice (Figure 6G). However, LysM-Cre; Tsc1mice showed a decrease in bone resorption, demonstrated by a decrease in the serum levels of C-terminal telopeptide (CTX) and urine levels of DPD, two in vivo bone resorption markers (Figure 6H).We then ablated Tsc1 in differentiated OCs using Ctsk-Cre mice. These mice showed normal body weight and size and femur length (Figure 6B and data not shown), with an increase in trabecular bone volume and bone mineral contents (Figures 6C–6E). The osteopetrotic bone phenotypes in the Ctsk-Cre; Tsc1mice were more severe than those of LysM-Cre; Tsc1mice.Surprisingly, the Ctsk-Cre; Tsc1mice showed an increase in the number of OCs (Figure 6F), which was confirmed by TRAP staining on bone sections (Figure 6G). However, the levels of urine DPD and serum CTX were decreased (Figure 6H), suggesting that OCs might be functionally incompetent. On the other hand, bone formation rate and bone mineralization rate were not altered in Ctsk-Cre; Tsc1mice (data not shown).We also compared the vertebrae (L3 and L4) of LysM-Cre; Tsc1 and Ctsk-Cre; Tsc1mouse lines against their respective control littermates using micro-CT, and found that bone mineral contents were not significantly altered in LysM-Cre; Tsc1mice, similar to the femur bone phenotypes (Figure 6A). However, the Ctsk-Cre; Tsc1mice showed greatly increased bone mineral contents (Figure 6A).
mTOR Activation Inhibited OC Differentiation, Fusion, and Activity
To determine the cellular basis of the decrease in bone resorption in LysM-Cre; Tsc1mice, we isolated bone marrow monocytes and carried out in vitro differentiation assays. mTOR was activated in monocyte cultures, yet its activation went down once undergoing differentiation (Figure S7A). It was found that Tsc1 monocytes showed increased proliferation rates (Figure 7A). Yet, in response to RANKL and M-CSF, the formation of TRAP-positive OCs and the expression of mature OC markers were decreased, while the number of TRAP-positive mononuclear cells was increased (Figures 7B and 7C). The OCs derived from Tsc1 progenitors showed much fewer nuclei than WT OCs (Figures 7C and S7B), accompanied by reduced levels of DC-Stamp and OC-Stamp (Figure 7D), which are required for OC fusion (Helming and Gordon, 2009). Moreover, differentiated osteoclasts derived from Tsc1-deficient monocytes showed a decrease in resorption activity on bone chips, which was associated with a decrease in the expression of enzymes involved in bone resorption (Figures 7D and 7E). These results suggest that mTOR activation inhibits osteoclast differentiation, fusion, and function, but promotes proliferation. As such, compromised differentiation may even increase the proliferation of OC progenitors. This may explain why the number of OC numbers in vivo was not significantly altered in LysM-Cre; Tsc1mice.
Figure 7
mTOR Activation Suppressed OC Differentiation, Fusion, and Resorption Activity, but Enhanced Proliferation
(A) Monocytes isolated from LysM-Cre; Tsc1 mice showed an increase in proliferation. The monocytes isolated from WT and LysM-Cre; Tsc1 mice were cultured for 3 days in the presence of M-CSF and RANKL. Scale bar, 50 μm. Right panel: quantitation data. N = 4 independent experiments.
(B) Ex vivo differentiation assays revealed that monocytes isolated from LysM-Cre; Tsc1 mice showed a decrease in the number TRAP-positive OCs. Monocytes were isolated from the bone marrow and were induced to differentiate by M-CSF and RANKL. The cell cultures were stained for TRAP 5 days later. Bottom panel: quantitation data. Scale bar, 100 μm. N = 4 independent experiments.
(C) Images of WT and Tsc1 OCs. Scale bar, 50 μm.
(D) qPCR analysis revealed that Tsc1 ablation in LysM+ monocytes showed a decrease in the expression of OC differentiation markers and genes regulating OC fusion. N = 4 independent experiments.
(E) Tsc1-deficient monocytes showed a decrease in bone resorption activity in vitro. Monocytes isolated from the LysM-Cre; Tsc1 mice were induced to differentiate by M-CSF and RANKL, and then plated onto dentine slices. After 5 days, the slices were stained with toluidine blue and the resorption areas were measured (bottom panel). Red arrow, resorption pit. N = 3 independent experiments.
(F) Tsc1 monocytes showed a decrease in NF-κB activation during OC differentiation.
(G) Ex vivo differentiation assays revealed that monocytes isolated from Ctsk-Cre; Tsc1 mice showed a slight increase in TRAP-positive OCs. Monocytes were isolated from the bone marrow and were induced to differentiate by M-CSF and RANKL. The cell cultures were stained for TRAP 5 days later. Bottom panel: quantitation data. Scale bar, 100 μm. N = 5 independent experiments.
(H) Tsc1-deficient OCs showed a decrease in bone resorption activity in vitro. Monocytes isolated from the Ctsk-Cre; Tsc1 mice were induced to differentiate by M-CSF and RANKL for 3 days, and then plated onto dentine slices. After 5 days, the slices were stained with toluidine blue and the resorption areas were measured (bottom panel). Red arrow, resorption pit. Scale bar, 50 μm. N = 3 independent experiments.
(I) CT images of TSC patients revealed sclerotic bone lesions (orange arrows) with roundish or irregular shape in the vertebral body and appendix of the cervical (a), thoracic (b), and lumbar (c) spine, as well as the sternum (d), rib (e), and pelvis (f).
(J) The TSC patient serum samples showed an increase in the levels of osteocalcin. N = 20.
(K) The TSC patient serum samples showed a decrease in the levels of CTX. N = 20.
mTOR Activation Suppressed OC Differentiation, Fusion, and Resorption Activity, but Enhanced Proliferation(A) Monocytes isolated from LysM-Cre; Tsc1mice showed an increase in proliferation. The monocytes isolated from WT and LysM-Cre; Tsc1mice were cultured for 3 days in the presence of M-CSF and RANKL. Scale bar, 50 μm. Right panel: quantitation data. N = 4 independent experiments.(B) Ex vivo differentiation assays revealed that monocytes isolated from LysM-Cre; Tsc1mice showed a decrease in the number TRAP-positive OCs. Monocytes were isolated from the bone marrow and were induced to differentiate by M-CSF and RANKL. The cell cultures were stained for TRAP 5 days later. Bottom panel: quantitation data. Scale bar, 100 μm. N = 4 independent experiments.(C) Images of WT and Tsc1 OCs. Scale bar, 50 μm.(D) qPCR analysis revealed that Tsc1 ablation in LysM+ monocytes showed a decrease in the expression of OC differentiation markers and genes regulating OC fusion. N = 4 independent experiments.(E) Tsc1-deficient monocytes showed a decrease in bone resorption activity in vitro. Monocytes isolated from the LysM-Cre; Tsc1mice were induced to differentiate by M-CSF and RANKL, and then plated onto dentine slices. After 5 days, the slices were stained with toluidine blue and the resorption areas were measured (bottom panel). Red arrow, resorption pit. N = 3 independent experiments.(F) Tsc1 monocytes showed a decrease in NF-κB activation during OC differentiation.(G) Ex vivo differentiation assays revealed that monocytes isolated from Ctsk-Cre; Tsc1mice showed a slight increase in TRAP-positive OCs. Monocytes were isolated from the bone marrow and were induced to differentiate by M-CSF and RANKL. The cell cultures were stained for TRAP 5 days later. Bottom panel: quantitation data. Scale bar, 100 μm. N = 5 independent experiments.(H) Tsc1-deficient OCs showed a decrease in bone resorption activity in vitro. Monocytes isolated from the Ctsk-Cre; Tsc1mice were induced to differentiate by M-CSF and RANKL for 3 days, and then plated onto dentine slices. After 5 days, the slices were stained with toluidine blue and the resorption areas were measured (bottom panel). Red arrow, resorption pit. Scale bar, 50 μm. N = 3 independent experiments.(I) CT images of TSCpatients revealed sclerotic bone lesions (orange arrows) with roundish or irregular shape in the vertebral body and appendix of the cervical (a), thoracic (b), and lumbar (c) spine, as well as the sternum (d), rib (e), and pelvis (f).(J) The TSCpatient serum samples showed an increase in the levels of osteocalcin. N = 20.(K) The TSCpatient serum samples showed a decrease in the levels of CTX. N = 20.Error bars represent the SD. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01.To further understand how mTOR activation affects OC differentiation, we looked at the signaling pathways known to control osteoclastogenesis. Western blot results showed that Tsc1 deficiency led to a decrease in activation of the nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) pathway (Figure 7F). This is consistent with previous reports showing that mTOR activation downregulated NF-κB signaling (Ghosh et al., 2006, Weichhart et al., 2008), the master regulator of OC differentiation, fusion, and activity.We also isolated bone marrow monocytes from Ctsk-Tsc1mice and performed ex vivo differentiation assays. These cells only express Cre after differentiating into Ctsk-positive OCs, which would then lead to Tsc1 deletion. We found that the number and size of TRAP-positive OCs were slightly increased in the mutant cultures (Figure 7G). However, differentiated OCs derived from Ctsk-Cre; Tsc1mice showed a decrease in bone resorption activity (Figure 7H). These results suggest that mTOR activation may promote proliferation and/or growth of differentiated osteoclasts, but interfere with their bone resorption activity. This may explain why Ctsk-Cre; Tsc1mice showed an increase in the number of OCs.We also investigated the mechanisms underlying the bone resorption defects caused by Tsc1 deficiency. Although autophagy has been reported to play a role in bone resorption (Chagin, 2016, DeSelm et al., 2011), we found that in OC cultures, autophagy markers p62 and LC3 were not significantly altered in the absence of Tsc1 (Figure S7C). However, OCs showed an increase in size on bone sections of Ctsk-Cre; Tsc1mice but not of LysM-Cre; Tsc1mice (Figure S7D). Moreover, the number of ring-like actin structures was decreased in both mouse lines, with the decrease in Ctsk-Cre; Tsc1mouse bone sections being greater than that in LysM-Cre; Tsc1mice (Figure S7E). These alterations may contribute to the resorption defects of Tsc1-deficient OCs and explain why Ctsk-Cre; Tsc1mice showed a greater osteopetrotic phenotype than LysM-Cre; Tsc1.
TSC Patients Showed Increased Focal Bone Density Accompanied by Increased Bone Formation and Decreased Bone Resorption
The above model animal studies indicate that mTOR signaling regulates bone size and quality during adolescent growth. We then wanted to validate these findings using TSCpatient samples. TSCpatients usually carry mutations in one allele of TSC1 or TSC2, and loss of heterozygosity leads to benign tumor formation. We collected 64 TSCpatients, 96.9% (62/64) of whom showed multiple sclerotic bone lesions in the vertebral body and appendix, the sternum, the rib, or the pelvis, on CT images (Figure 7I). We also collected serum samples from TSCpatients between the ages 15 and 24 years to analyze bone formation marker osteocalcin and bone resorption marker CTX, and found that, compared with the age-matched normal group, TSCpatients showed an increase in osteocalcin and a decrease in CTX (Figures 7J and 7K), suggesting that bone formation is increased while bone resorption is decreased in TSCpatients.
Discussion
This study, by analyzing mouse models with mTOR activated in BM-MSCs, monocytes, or their progenies, demonstrates that mTOR signaling regulates adolescent bone growth in size, mass, and mineral contents by acting on different cell types. mTOR activation in chondrocytes and OBs appears to be strong during adolescent growth and declines when reaching adulthood. mTOR activation increases bone radial growth, trabecular bone volume, and cortical bone thickness, mainly by promoting proliferation of Prx1+ BM-MSCs and increasing the pools of MSCs. However, mTOR activation decreases the length of long bones and bone mineralization, likely caused by impeded MSC chondrogenic and osteogenic differentiation, respectively (Figure S7F). These findings suggest that mTOR signaling coordinates MSC proliferation and differentiation to regulate bone size and quality, and that expansion of the BM-MSC pool is an important step during bone growth. The mTOR signaling pathway may integrate the signals from growth factors, nutrients, and other pathways such as Pten or LKB1 to regulate bone growth in length (Ford-Hutchinson et al., 2007, Lai et al., 2013, Shima et al., 1998).mTOR activation in MSCs appears to impede bone mineralization, indicating that mTOR activation does not mediate the anabolic effects of growth factors on bone mineral accretion. Instead, mTOR activation suppresses the catabolic effects of monocyte/OC in cell-autonomous manners. While several in vitro studies suggest that inhibition of mTOR with rapamycin impedes OC survival and differentiation (Sugatani and Hruska, 2005), our study provides genetic evidence that mTOR activation inhibits OC differentiation, fusion, and resorption activity, but promotes proliferation of monocytes and differentiated OCs, suggesting stage-specific effects for mTOR in osteoclastogenesis and function (Figure S7F). OC differentiation and fusion defects may be caused by compromised NF-κB activation and decreased expression of cell fusion gene DC-Stamp and OC-Stamp (Figure S7F), while OC resorption defects may be caused by mTOR-induced alteration in cell size and/or cytoskeleton. The more severe osteopetrotic phenotype of Ctsk-Cre; Tsc1 than LysM-Cre; Tsc1mice can be explained by the difference in OC cell size and cytoskeleton (Figures S7D and S7E). The lack of increase in OC numbers in LysM-Cre; Tsc1mice could be caused by opposite and stage-specific effects of mTOR activation on OC proliferation and differentiation. It is worth noting that the peak bone mass is a net result of 10 weeks of bone formation and resorption, which may not be reflected by the bone parameters measured at week 10 of age or in vitro assays.In addition, mTOR activation in MSCs, but not in OBs, plays a role in coupling to osteoclastogenesis. mTOR signaling in Prx1+ MSCs alters the expression of M-CSF, OPG, and RANKL to inhibit osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption. Consistently, previous studies of mouse lines with Tsc1 ablated in Osx- or osteocalcin-expressing OBs failed to detect significant alterations in bone resorption (Chen and Long, 2014, Fang et al., 2015, Riddle et al., 2014). These findings support the concept that coupling exists between MSCs and monocytes in addition to the coupling between bone formation and resorption (Cong et al., 2016). Thus, mTOR increases bone mineral contents by directly inhibiting OC differentiation and activity, and by altering MSCs-secreted RANKL and OPG.Our studies reveal that more than 90% TSCpatients of Han Chinese develop focal sclerotic bone lesions at different locations in the skeleton. Analysis of TSCpatient serum samples confirmed that bone resorption marker is reduced, whereas bone formation marker is increased. While it is assumed that increased focal bone density is secondary to increased bone formation (Umeoka et al., 2008), we found that, in mouse models, deletion of Tsc1 in BM-MSCs or OBs led to a decrease in bone mineral contents. In contrast, deletion of Tsc1 in monocytes especially in OCs led to a great increase in bone mineral contents. These data suggest that the increase in focal bone density in TSCpatients is caused mainly by decreased bone resorption. Thus, sclerotic bone lesions should be deemed as “osteopetrotic lesions” in TSCpatients.Model animal and human sample studies have shown that hormone deficiency and undernutrition are the major factors affecting organ size, and which inhibit cell proliferation and cell size in the organ. Our current studies, together with the studies of OB- and chondrocyte-specific deletion of mTOR pathway molecules, indicate that mTOR signaling is an important regulator of bone size and quality. mTOR regulates bone size by acting on MSCs rather than OBs; its pro-proliferation activity in MSCs accounts for the bone radial growth and bone volume accrual, whereas its negative effects on MSC chondrogenic differentiation regulate bone growth in length. Therefore the coordination of MSC proliferation and differentiation controls bone growth in length and width.In summary, we show that mTOR signaling regulates bone size mainly by coordinating MSC proliferation and differentiation, and bone quality mainly by suppressing OC differentiation and activity. Moreover, mTOR also plays a role in coupling MSCs and monocytes. Studies of TSCpatient samples validated these findings. Collectively, our studies uncover multiple roles played by mTOR signaling in bone size and quality control.
Experimental Procedures
TSC Patients
All the 64 TSCpatients (38 women and 26 men; age range, 4–46 years; mean ± SD age, 26.1 ± 8.7 years) underwent CT examinations of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis using a SOMATOM Definition Flash scanner (Siemens Medical Systems) and a Discovery CT750 HD scanner (GE Medical Systems) with slice thickness of 5 mm and tube voltage of 120 kvp. The protocol for this study was approved by our institutional review board. All patients gave written consent.
Animal Studies
Animal work was carried out following the recommendations from the National Research Council Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, with the protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Shanghai, China (SYXK(SH)2011-0112). The Prx1-Cre, Dermo1-Cre, Osx-Cre, LysM-Cre, Ctsk-Cre, and floxed Tsc1mouse lines were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory. For micro-CT and histomorphometry analysis, male mice at age 2.5 months were used, with the number of mice shown for each figure. For other mouse experiments, three mice (2.5-month-old male or female) were used.
Bone Histomorphometry and Three-Point Bending Experiment
Bone histomorphometry was performed on undecalcified sections as described in the Supplemental Information, and three-point bending experiments were conducted on a universal testing machine (RGM-2020, Shenzhen Reger Instrument) using fixed femurs.
Measurement of Serum Osteocalcin and CTX and Urine DPD
Fasting serum samples of TSCpatients and normal individuals were collected to determine the levels of osteocalcin and CTX. Mouse urine samples were collected in the morning and were used to determine the levels of DPD and creatinine. The DPD values were normalized to creatinine.
BM-MSC Isolation and Differentiation
BM-MSCs were isolated and induced to differentiate as described by Cong et al. (2016).
Monocyte Isolation and Differentiation and Resorption Pit Analysis
BM-MSCs were isolated and induced to differentiate as described by Cong et al. (2016).
qPCR
Total RNA was extracted by using TRIzol Regent (Invitrogen). The RNA was reverse transcribed using a Transcriptor Universal cDNA Master (Roche) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Real-time PCR was performed as described previously (Cong et al., 2016). See Supplemental Information for primer sequences.
Immunohistochemical Staining
See Supplemental Information for detailed protocols.
Statistical Analyses
Numerical data and histograms were expressed as the mean ± SD. Comparisons between two groups were analyzed using two-tailed unpaired Student's t test. p Values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Analysis of mice was litter-based, and at least three litters were analyzed for every parameter. All experiments were repeated three to four times.
Author Contributions
B.L., H.Z., Z.Z., and W.Z. designed the research. H.W., Z.W., P.L., Q.C., R.C., W.X., S.W., H.L., X.X., S.L., W.H., L.Z., J.Z., and S.L.H. performed the research. H.W., Z.W., and W.Z. analyzed the data; W.X., H.Z., W.H., and Z.Z. provided the TSCpatient samples. H.L. and B.L. wrote the paper.
Authors: Patrick Li; Susana Boronat; Alexandra Lauryn Geffrey; Ignasi Barber; Brian Edward Grottkau; Elizabeth Anne Thiele Journal: Am J Med Genet A Date: 2015-07-14 Impact factor: 2.802
Authors: Fang Fang; Shaogang Sun; Li Wang; Jun-Lin Guan; Marco Giovannini; Yuan Zhu; Fei Liu Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Bo Gao; Hai Song; Kevin Bishop; Gene Elliot; Lisa Garrett; Milton A English; Philipp Andre; James Robinson; Raman Sood; Yasuhiro Minami; Aris N Economides; Yingzi Yang Journal: Dev Cell Date: 2011-02-15 Impact factor: 12.270
Authors: Thomas Weichhart; Giuseppina Costantino; Marko Poglitsch; Margit Rosner; Maximilian Zeyda; Karl M Stuhlmeier; Thomas Kolbe; Thomas M Stulnig; Walter H Hörl; Markus Hengstschläger; Mathias Müller; Marcus D Säemann Journal: Immunity Date: 2008-10-09 Impact factor: 31.745
Authors: Heng Du; John R Dreier; Mahsa Zarei; Chin-Lee Wu; Roderick W Bronson; David J Kwiatkowski Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2018-12-15 Impact factor: 6.150