Tien-Wen Lee1, Shao-Wei Xue2. 1. Center for Cognition and Brain Disorders, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, China; Zhejiang Key Laboratory for Research in Assessment of Cognitive Impairments, Hangzhou 310015, China; Department of Psychiatry, Dajia Lee's General Hospital, Lee's Medical Corporation, Taichung, Taiwan. Electronic address: dwlee_ibru@yahoo.com.tw. 2. Center for Cognition and Brain Disorders, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, China; Zhejiang Key Laboratory for Research in Assessment of Cognitive Impairments, Hangzhou 310015, China. Electronic address: xuedrm@126.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous empirical research has treated regional neural responses and network architecture separately. However, anecdotal reports have suggested a close relationship between the two. This study aims to investigate the influence of structural connectivity on regional spontaneous activities. METHODS: Datasets of structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI), resting state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) of 36 right-handed healthy subjects (average age 27.4) were selected from the NKI Rockland sample. In the sMRI data, the cerebral cortex was parcellated into 70 regions of interest (ROIs) according to an anatomical atlas. Two indices were calculated from rs-fMRI for each ROI: the regional homogeneity (ReHo) and the amplitude of low frequency fluctuation (ALFF). Diffusion tensor imaging was computed from DWI and was converted to tractography. Four graph indices of structural connectivity were retrieved from the tractography results and the 70 ROIs, as follows: nodal degree, clustering coefficient, local efficiency and betweenness centrality. RESULTS: ReHo values were significantly correlated with all 4 graph features, whereas ALFF values were significantly correlated with nodal degrees and clustering coefficients. Both ReHo and ALFF tended to increase with segregation (clustering coefficient and local efficiency) and decrease with centrality (nodal degree and betweenness centrality). DISCUSSION: Though derived from local spontaneous activities, ReHo and ALFF may reflect the network properties of the underlying anatomical architecture. The results supported the hypothesis that the properties of the network structure may shape the regional neural response profiles.
BACKGROUND: Previous empirical research has treated regional neural responses and network architecture separately. However, anecdotal reports have suggested a close relationship between the two. This study aims to investigate the influence of structural connectivity on regional spontaneous activities. METHODS: Datasets of structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI), resting state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) of 36 right-handed healthy subjects (average age 27.4) were selected from the NKI Rockland sample. In the sMRI data, the cerebral cortex was parcellated into 70 regions of interest (ROIs) according to an anatomical atlas. Two indices were calculated from rs-fMRI for each ROI: the regional homogeneity (ReHo) and the amplitude of low frequency fluctuation (ALFF). Diffusion tensor imaging was computed from DWI and was converted to tractography. Four graph indices of structural connectivity were retrieved from the tractography results and the 70 ROIs, as follows: nodal degree, clustering coefficient, local efficiency and betweenness centrality. RESULTS: ReHo values were significantly correlated with all 4 graph features, whereas ALFF values were significantly correlated with nodal degrees and clustering coefficients. Both ReHo and ALFF tended to increase with segregation (clustering coefficient and local efficiency) and decrease with centrality (nodal degree and betweenness centrality). DISCUSSION: Though derived from local spontaneous activities, ReHo and ALFF may reflect the network properties of the underlying anatomical architecture. The results supported the hypothesis that the properties of the network structure may shape the regional neural response profiles.
Authors: Ursula A Tooley; Allyson P Mackey; Rastko Ciric; Kosha Ruparel; Tyler M Moore; Ruben C Gur; Raquel E Gur; Theodore D Satterthwaite; Danielle S Bassett Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2020-01-10 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: Sien Hu; Jaime S Ide; Herta H Chao; Simon Zhornitsky; Kimberly A Fischer; Wuyi Wang; Sheng Zhang; Chiang-Shan R Li Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2018-02-07 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Matteo Respino; Matthew J Hoptman; Lindsay W Victoria; George S Alexopoulos; Nili Solomonov; Aliza T Stein; Maria Coluccio; Sarah Shizuko Morimoto; Chloe J Blau; Lila Abreu; Katherine E Burdick; Conor Liston; Faith M Gunning Journal: Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging Date: 2019-11-07
Authors: Parisa Moridian; Navid Ghassemi; Mahboobeh Jafari; Salam Salloum-Asfar; Delaram Sadeghi; Marjane Khodatars; Afshin Shoeibi; Abbas Khosravi; Sai Ho Ling; Abdulhamit Subasi; Roohallah Alizadehsani; Juan M Gorriz; Sara A Abdulla; U Rajendra Acharya Journal: Front Mol Neurosci Date: 2022-10-04 Impact factor: 6.261