Literature DB >> 28478788

On-Scene and Final Assessments and Their Interrelationship Among Patients Who Use the EMS on Multiple Occasions.

Julia Tärnqvist1, Erik Dahlén1, Gabriella Norberg2, Carl Magnusson3, Johan Herlitz2, Anneli Strömsöe4, Christer Axelsson2, Magnus Andersson Hagiwara2.   

Abstract

Introduction The use of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) is increasing. A number of patients call repeatedly for EMS. Early studies of frequent callers show that they form a heterogenous group. Problem There is a lack of research on frequent EMS callers. There is furthermore a lack of knowledge about characteristics and the prehospital assessment of the patients who call for EMS on several occasions. Finally, there is a general lack of knowledge with regard to the association between the prehospital assessment by health care providers and the final diagnosis.
METHOD: Patients in Skaraborg in Western Sweden, who used the EMS at least four times in 2014, were included, excluding transport between hospitals. Information on the prehospital assessment on-scene and the final diagnosis was collected from the EMS and hospital case records.
RESULTS: In all, 339 individual patients who used the EMS on 1,855 occasions were included, accounting for five percent of all missions. Fifty percent were women. The age range was 10-98 years, but more than 50.0% were in the age range of 70-89 years. The most common emergency signs and symptoms (ESS) codes on the scene were dyspnea, chest pain, and abdominal pain. The most common final diagnosis was chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (eight percent). Thirteen percent of all cases had a final diagnosis defined as a potentially life-threatening condition. Among these, 22.0% of prehospital assessments were retrospectively judged as potentially inappropriate. Forty-nine percent had a defined final diagnosis not fulfilling the criteria for a potentially life-threatening condition. Among these cases, 30.0% of prehospital assessments were retrospectively judged as potentially inappropriate.
CONCLUSION: Among patients who used EMS on multiple occasions, the most common symptoms on-scene were dyspnea, chest pain, and abdominal pain. The most common final diagnosis was chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. In 13.0%, the final diagnosis of a potentially life-threatening condition was indicated. In a minority of these cases, the assessment on-scene was judged as potentially inappropriate. Tärnqvist J , Dahlén E , Norberg G , Magnusson C , Herlitz J , Strömsöe A , Axelsson C , Andersson Hagiwara M . On-scene and final assessments and their interrelationship among patients who use the EMS on multiple occasions. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017;32(5):528-535.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ED emergency department; EMS Emergency Medical Service; ESS emergency signs and symptoms; Emergency Medical Services; assessment; diagnosis; multiple use

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28478788     DOI: 10.1017/S1049023X17006458

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prehosp Disaster Med        ISSN: 1049-023X            Impact factor:   2.040


  4 in total

1.  Ambulance nurses' experiences of deciding a patient does not require ambulance care.

Authors:  Tess Backman; Päivi Juuso; Ronja Borg; Åsa Engström
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2019-03-19

2.  Patient characteristics, triage utilisation, level of care, and outcomes in an unselected adult patient population seen by the emergency medical services: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Carl Magnusson; Johan Herlitz; Christer Axelsson
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2020-01-30

3.  Pre-hospital triage performance and emergency medical services nurse's field assessment in an unselected patient population attended to by the emergency medical services: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Carl Magnusson; Johan Herlitz; Christer Axelsson
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  The ambulance nurse experiences of non-conveying patients.

Authors:  Erik Höglund; Agneta Schröder; Margareta Möller; Magnus Andersson-Hagiwara; Emma Ohlsson-Nevo
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 3.036

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.