Literature DB >> 28478394

Safety and efficacy of a low-cost glaucoma drainage device for refractory childhood glaucoma.

Sushmita Kaushik1, Pankaj Kataria1, Srishti Raj1, Surinder Singh Pandav1, Jagat Ram1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a low-cost glaucoma drainage device (GDD), Aurolab aqueous drainage implant (AADI), similar in design to the Baerveldt glaucoma implant (BGI), in refractory childhood glaucoma.
METHODS: This prospective interventional study was conducted in a tertiary care postgraduate teaching institute. Children aged <16 years with uncontrolled intraocular pressure (IOP) refractory to medical treatment and considered at high risk of failure following trabeculectomy were recruited. Eligible children were implanted with the AADI. Those completing minimum 6-month follow-up were included. Main outcome measures were IOP reduction from preoperative values and postoperative complications.
RESULTS: 34 eyes of 31 patients were analysed. Average follow-up was 18.3±6.9 months. Mean IOP reduced from 27.4±7.5 mm Hg on maximum medication to 14.6±10.74 mm Hg, 13.8±7.5 mm Hg, 12.8±5.6 mm Hg and 14.7±5.8 mm Hg at 1 week, 6 months, 1 year (32 eyes of 29 children) and 2 years (25 eyes of 22 children) postoperatively, respectively (p<0.001). The cumulative probability of success was 91.18% at 6 months and 81.7% at 18-24 months. Mean number of topical medications decreased from 3.1±0.6 to 1.8±1.3 at 6 months and 1.6±1.1 at 24 months (p<0.001). Preoperatively, 25 patients required systemic acetazolamide, decreasing to three patients at 2 years. There was no tube erosion or infection. One eye developed retinal detachment.
CONCLUSION: The AADI appears to be a viable low-cost GDD with effectiveness and safety profile comparable with published reports of the BGI and Ahmed glaucoma valve implant in children. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Baerveldt; Childhood Glaucoma; Glaucoma Drainage Device

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28478394     DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-310276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  10 in total

1.  Preliminary Surgical Outcomes of a Trimmed-Plate Aurolab Aqueous Drainage Implant (AADI) in Eyes at High Risk of Hypotony.

Authors:  Ahmad AlJaloud; Sara AlHilali; Deepak P Edward; Khabir Ahmad; Rizwan Malik
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-05-13

2.  Clinical outcome of a nonvalved Aurolab aqueous drainage implant in posterior segment versus anterior chamber.

Authors:  Devendra Maheshwari; Shylesh Dabke; Sindhushree Rajagopal; Mohideen A Kadar; Rengappa Ramakrishnan
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.848

3.  Surgical outcomes of the Aurolab aqueous drainage implant (AADI) versus the Ahmed glaucoma valve for refractory paediatric glaucoma in Middle Eastern children.

Authors:  Abdullah M Khan; Khabir Ahmad; Motazz Alarfaj; Humoud Alotaibi; Ahmad AlJaloud; Rizwan Malik
Journal:  BMJ Open Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-11-10

4.  Pars plana Aurolab aqueous drainage implantation for refractory glaucoma: Outcome of a new modified technique.

Authors:  Mohideen A Kader; Shylesh B Dabke; Aakriti G Shukla; Venugopal Reddy; Syed M Abdul Khadar; Devendra Maheshwari; Rengappa Ramakrishnan
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 2.969

5.  Intermediate-term outcome of Aurolab aqueous drainage implant.

Authors:  Reji Philip; Premanand Chandran; Nabeed Aboobacker; Mrunali Dhavalikar; Ganesh V Raman
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.848

6.  Commentary on: Glaucoma drainage devices: Boon or bane.

Authors:  Sushmita Kaushik
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.848

7.  Retinal detachment in eyes treated with Aurolab aqueous drainage implant for refractory glaucoma - Incidence and outcomes.

Authors:  Naresh Babu; Girish Baliga; George Varghese Puthuran; Kim Ramasamy
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 2.969

8.  Commentary: AADI: New kid on the block.

Authors:  Vanita Pathak-Ray
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.848

9.  A prospective randomized controlled study of Aurolab aqueous drainage implant versus Ahmed glaucoma valve in refractory glaucoma: A pilot study.

Authors:  Shweta G Rathi; Natasha G Seth; Savleen Kaur; Faisal Thattaruthody; Sushmita Kaushik; Srishti Raj; Surinder S Pandav; Jagat Ram
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.848

10.  Outcome of a Low-Cost Glaucoma Implant versus the Baerveldt Glaucoma Implant for Paediatric Glaucoma in a Tertiary Hospital in Egypt.

Authors:  Mahmoud F Rateb; Hazem Abdel Motaal; Mohamed Shehata; Mohamed Anwar; Dalia Tohamy; Mohamed G A Saleh
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 1.909

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.