Literature DB >> 28478345

Quantitative comparison of bright field and annular bright field imaging modes for characterization of oxygen octahedral tilts.

Young-Min Kim1, Stephen J Pennycook2, Albina Y Borisevich3.   

Abstract

Octahedral tilt behavior is increasingly recognized as an important contributing factor to the physical behavior of perovskite oxide materials and especially their interfaces, necessitating the development of high-resolution methods of tilt mapping. There are currently two major approaches for quantitative imaging of tilts in scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM), bright field (BF) and annular bright field (ABF). In this paper, we show that BF STEM can be reliably used for measurements of oxygen octahedral tilts. While optimal conditions for BF imaging are more restricted with respect to sample thickness and defocus, we find that BF imaging with an aberration-corrected microscope with the accelerating voltage of 300kV gives us the most accurate quantitative measurement of the oxygen column positions. Using the tilted perovskite structure of BiFeO3 (BFO) as our test sample, we simulate BF and ABF images in a wide range of conditions, identifying the optimal imaging conditions for each mode. We show that unlike ABF imaging, BF imaging remains directly quantitatively interpretable for a wide range of the specimen mistilt, suggesting that it should be preferable to the ABF STEM imaging for quantitative structure determination.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BiFeO(3); Bright field; Octahedral tilt; Oxygen imaging; Perovskite; STEM; Transition metal oxide

Year:  2017        PMID: 28478345     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2017.04.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultramicroscopy        ISSN: 0304-3991            Impact factor:   2.689


  4 in total

1.  Cooperative evolution of polar distortion and nonpolar rotation of oxygen octahedra in oxide heterostructures.

Authors:  Taewon Min; Wooseon Choi; Jinsol Seo; Gyeongtak Han; Kyung Song; Sangwoo Ryu; Hyungwoo Lee; Jungwoo Lee; Kitae Eom; Chang-Beom Eom; Hu Young Jeong; Young-Min Kim; Jaekwang Lee; Sang Ho Oh
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 14.136

2.  Flat-surface-assisted and self-regulated oxidation resistance of Cu(111).

Authors:  Su Jae Kim; Yong In Kim; Bipin Lamichhane; Young-Hoon Kim; Yousil Lee; Chae Ryong Cho; Miyeon Cheon; Jong Chan Kim; Hu Young Jeong; Taewoo Ha; Jungdae Kim; Young Hee Lee; Seong-Gon Kim; Young-Min Kim; Se-Young Jeong
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Deep sub-angstrom resolution imaging by electron ptychography with misorientation correction.

Authors:  Haozhi Sha; Jizhe Cui; Rong Yu
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 14.957

4.  Double-Bilayer polar nanoregions and Mn antisites in (Ca, Sr)3Mn2O7.

Authors:  Leixin Miao; Kishwar-E Hasin; Parivash Moradifar; Debangshu Mukherjee; Ke Wang; Sang-Wook Cheong; Elizabeth A Nowadnick; Nasim Alem
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 17.694

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.