| Literature DB >> 28477620 |
Bing Wang1,2,3, Diming Wang1,2,4, Xuehui Wu1,2, Jie Cai1,2, Mei Liu1,2, Xinbei Huang1,2, Jiusheng Wu5, Jianxin Liu6,7, Leluo Guan8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Rumen epithelial tissue plays an important role in nutrient absorption and rumen health. However, whether forage quality and particle size impact the rumen epithelial morphology is unclear. The current study was conducted to elucidate the effects of forage quality and forage particle size on rumen epithelial morphology and to identify potential underlying molecular mechanisms by analyzing the transcriptome of the rumen epithelium (RE). To achieve these objectives, 18 mid-lactation dairy cows were allocated to three groups (6 cows per group), and were fed with one of three different forage-based diets, alfalfa hay (AH), corn stover (CS), and rice straw (RS) for 14 weeks, respectively. Ruminal volatile fatty acids (VFAs) and epithelial thickness were determined, and RNA-sequencing was conducted to identify the transcriptomic changes of rumen epithelial under different forage-based diets.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28477620 PMCID: PMC5420399 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-017-3726-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Primers used for quantitative real-time PCR
| Gene | Gene Bank ID | Primers | Primer sequence (5’-3’) | Amplicon Size | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| BT020994.1 | Forward | CCTTGTGGGTATCGTGGTGG | 150 bp | This study |
| Reverse | CGTCTAGCACGTCCACTCTT | ||||
|
| XM_005214890.3 | Forward | TGACTGGGCAAGGGGAGCCG | 112bp | This study |
| Reverse | GGGGCCACCCCAAAGAAGCC | ||||
|
| BT020640.1 | Forward | CAGTCTTGGCCCTTCCTTGT | 176bp | This study |
| Reverse | TCAATTGCGCCATCTTGCAG | ||||
|
| XM_015469379.1 | Forward | TGCACAGCTAACATGAGCCA | 148 bp | This study |
| Reverse | CCAGAGCCCTTTGCACTGTA | ||||
|
| NM_174045.1 | Forward | ATCCAACTGACTTGCTCGCT | 278 bp | This study |
| Reverse | ACCACCACCAGTTGTGTAGC | ||||
|
| BC133574.1 | Forward | ACGCAGTAACTTGGGTGGAG | 148 bp | This study |
| Reverse | ACAGAGACGGCTCCAAAACA | ||||
|
| NM_001034340.2 | Forward | GATGCAACTACAACTGCCCG | 116 bp | This study |
| Reverse | CCACCCTTATGCTGGAAGCC | ||||
|
| NM_174556.1 | Forward | TTAATGCCTGCACATCCCGA | 259 bp | This study |
| Reverse | CCCTATGGGGCTTCAGCAAA | ||||
|
| BC102589 | Forward | TGGAAAGGCCATCACCATCT | 60 bp | [ |
| Reverse | CCCACTTGA TGTTGGCAG | ||||
|
| NM-173979 | Forward | GCCATGAAGCTGAAGATGAC | 229 bp | [ |
| Reverse | CCTTCTGCAGCTCAGATATG |
Fig. 1Histomicrograph showing the width of ruminal papilla (a)
Nutritional and Physical features [Particle size (PS) distribution (%) and physically effective NDF (peNDF)] of three experimental diets (n = 5)
| Dieta |
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Itemb | AH | CS | RS | SEM | AH vs. CS | AH vs. RS | CS vs. RS |
| Nutritional factor | |||||||
| CP | 16.7 | 16.2 | 16.0 | 0.25 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.47 |
| Net energy for lactation, Mcal/kg | 1.57 | 1.45 | 1.43 | ||||
| Physical factor | |||||||
| PS, >19.0mm | 32.2 | 16.9 | 40.4 | 1.84 | <0.01 | 0.03 | <0.01 |
| PS, 8.0 to 19.0 mm | 16.0 | 30.6 | 10.4 | 1.89 | <0.01 | 0.07 | <0.01 |
| PS, 1.18 to 8.0 mm | 35.8 | 36.1 | 33.0 | 2.08 | 0.94 | 0.46 | 0.18 |
| PS, <1.18 mm | 16.1 | 16.4 | 16.2 | 1.34 | 0.81 | 0.96 | 0.91 |
| peNDF19.0 | 10.0 | 6.1 | 14.9 | 0.67 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
| peNDF8.0 | 23.4 | 25.0 | 33.7 | 1.71 | 0.34 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
aAH = Total mixed ration (TMR) containing alfalfa hay as the main forage; CS = TMR containing corn stover as the main forage; RS = TMR containing rice straw as the main forage
bCP = crude protein; NEL = Calculated values based on Chinese recommondations; NDF = neutral detergent fiber; peNDF8.0 measured as the NDF content of diet multiplied by proportion of particles > 8.0 mm; peNDF19.0 measured as the NDF content of diet multiplied by proportion of particles > 19.0 mm; Particle size distribution determined by the Penn State Particle Separator sieving technique
Rumen fermentation characteristics in dairy cows fed with three experimental forage-based diets (n = 6)
| Dietary treatmentsa |
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Item | AH | CS | RS | SEM | AH vs. CS | AH vs. RS | CS vs. RS |
| pH | 6.39 | 6.41 | 6.39 | 0.050 | 0.89 | 0.98 | 0.85 |
| Ammonia-N, mg/dL | 14.5 | 15.8 | 20.3 | 1.07 | 0.37 | 0.01 | 0.04 |
| Total VFA, m | 93.5 | 81.0 | 83.1 | 2.83 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.63 |
| Acetate, m | 66.2 | 57.1 | 59.8 | 1.99 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.20 |
| Propionate, m | 19.4 | 17.2 | 17.1 | 0.75 | 0.14 | 0.07 | 0.95 |
| Butyrate, m | 7.90 | 8.64 | 6.18 | 0.483 | 0.13 | 0.09 | 0.02 |
| Molar proportion, % | |||||||
| Acetate | 71.1 | 70.3 | 72.2 | 0.89 | 0.03 | 0.40 | 0.02 |
| Propionate | 20.7 | 21.4 | 20.5 | 0.55 | 0.51 | 0.80 | 0.36 |
| Butyrate | 8.29 | 10.9 | 7.34 | 0.556 | <0.01 | 0.27 | 0.02 |
| Acetate: Propionate | 3.47 | 3.24 | 3.60 | 0.108 | 0.23 | 0.45 | 0.07 |
aAH = Total mixed ration (TMR) containing alfalfa hay as the main forage; CS = TMR containing corn stover as the main forage; RS = TMR containing rice straw as the main forage
Fig. 2The evaluation of width of rumen papillae in dairy cows fed three different diets (n = 6). AH = Total mixed ration (TMR) containing alfalfa hay as the main forage; CS = TMR containing corn stover as the main forage; RS = TMR containing rice straw as the main forage
Enriched functions of dietary differentially expressed genes based on GO terms analyzed using DAVID
| Functional term | Count | % |
|
| Fold Enrichment | Involved genes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| calcium ion binding | 9 | 29.0 | 5.3E-6 | 2.0E-4 | 8.2 |
|
|
| ||||||
| extracellular region | 9 | 22.5 | 1.3E-5 | 5.9E-4 | 7.7 |
|
|
| ||||||
| complement activation, alternative pathway | 3 | 10.7 | 5.1E-5 | 4.8E-3 | 256.9 |
|
1AH = Total mixed ration (TMR) containing alfalfa hay as the main forage; CS = TMR containing corn stover as the main forage; RS = TMR containing rice straw as the main forage
Fig. 3Functional classification involved in biological process targeted by dietary DE genes in the rumen of dairy cows fed three different diets. AH = Total mixed ration (TMR) containing alfalfa hay as the main forage; CS = TMR containing corn stover as the main forage; RS = TMR containing rice straw as the main forage
Fig. 4The dietary associated differentially expressed (DE) genes. AH associated DE genes, the mutually DE genes between AH vs. CS and AH vs. RS; CS associated DE genes, the mutually DE genes between CS vs AH and CS vs. RS; RS associated DE genes, the mutually DE genes between RS vs AH and RS vs. CS. AH = Total mixed ration (TMR) containing alfalfa hay as the main forage; CS = TMR containing corn stover as the main forage; RS = TMR containing rice straw as the main forage
Correlations between the concentration of volatile fatty acids and expression of detected genes (P < 0.05, n = 18 vs. n = 6) in dairy cows fed with three experimental forage-based diets
| Genes | Total VFA | Acetate | Propionate | Butyrate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alla | ||||
|
| −0.51 | −0.61 | ||
|
| 0.54 | |||
|
| 0.47 | |||
|
| −0.49 | |||
|
| 0.54 | |||
|
| −0.52 | −0.48 | −0.60 | |
|
| −0.52 | −0.67 | ||
|
| −0.56 | −0.55 | ||
|
| −0.63 | −0.62 | −0.48 | |
|
| −0.61 | −0.64 | −0.48 | |
|
| −0.52 | −0.54 | −0.52 | |
|
| −0.52 | −0.53 | ||
| AHb | ||||
|
| 0.88 | 0.88 | ||
|
| −0.91 | |||
| CSc | ||||
|
| −0.95 | −0.92 | −0.88 | |
|
| −0.91 | −0.88 | −0.86 | |
|
| −0.93 | −0.84 | −0.94 | −0.88 |
| RSd | ||||
|
| −0.86 | −0.86 | ||
aAll, based on analysis with all 18 animals
bAH = Total mixed ration (TMR) containing alfalfa hay as the main forage
cCS = TMR containing corn stover as the main forage
dRS = TMR containing rice straw as the main forage
Correlation between the rumen morphology and the expression of differential expressed genes (P < 0.05, n = 18 vs. n = 6) in dairy cows fed with three experimental forage-based diets
| Item | R | Item | R |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alla | CSb | ||
|
| 0.52 |
| −0.92 |
|
| −0.69 | RSc | |
|
| 0.94 | ||
|
| −0.96 |
aAll, based on analysis with all 18 animals
bCS = Total mixed ration (TMR) containing corn stover as the main forage
cRS = TMR containing rice straw as the main forage
Fig. 5Expression of DSG1, PRSS53, BAG3, IGFBP3, CYR61, HSPB8, PI3, and HLA-DQA1 detected by quantitative real-time PCR validation and RNA-seq. AH = Total mixed ration (TMR) containing alfalfa hay as the main forage; CS = TMR containing corn stover as the main forage; RS = TMR containing rice straw as the main forage. Note: a-b means within same index column with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05; among the three pair-wise comparisons)
Fig. 6A proposed relationship between transcriptional mechanism and phenotype of the morphology of RE affected by nutritional and physical factors in the cows fed three different diets. The arrows with solid red line indicate the significant correlation between the two defined items from this study (P < 0.05). Arrows with solid blue line indicate the determined or reported relationship between the two defined items. While arrows with dotted blue line indicate the potential correlation between the two items identified from this study. AH = Total mixed ration (TMR) containing alfalfa hay as the main forage; CS = TMR containing corn stover as the main forage; RS = TMR containing rice straw as the main forage. The different colors or shapes across the genes represent the differentially expressed genes among the comparisons between 2 dietary treatments. BAG3 = BCL2-associated athanogene 3; C2 = complement C2; C7 = complement C7; DSG1 = desmoglein 1; HLA-DQA1 = major histocompatibility complex, class II, DQ alpha 1; HSPB8 = heat shock protein family B (small) member 8; IGFBP3 = insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3; LPO = lactoperoxidase; PI3 = peptidase inhibitor 3, skin-derived; SAA1 = serum amyloid A1; UGT2B17 = UDP glucuronosyltransferase family 2 member B17. Color version available in the online PDF