Literature DB >> 28477297

Engaging rural communities in genetic research: challenges and opportunities.

Caress Dean1, Amanda J Fogleman1, Whitney E Zahnd1, Alexander E Lipka2, Ripan Singh Malhi3, Kristin R Delfino1, Wiley D Jenkins4.   

Abstract

Statistical analyses of health and disease in rural communities is frequently limited by low sample counts. Still, some studies indicate increased risk for some diseases even after adjustment for known risk factors. It has been hypothesized that the context of community formation in rural areas facilitates the propagation of genetic founder effects-potentially impacting disease susceptibility. However, outright examination of genetic diversity in such communities has not been performed. Our objective was to engage otherwise research-inexperienced rural communities of largely European descent in genomic research in the context of cancer susceptibility. From September 2015 to February 2016, we implemented a systematic process of progressive community engagement. This iterative method sought project buy-in from first the town mayor, then village council. If approved by both, a focus group of community members examined how residents might view the research, informed consent and specimen collection, and issues of privacy. We were successful in engaging three of the four communities approached for the research project. There was universal enthusiasm for the project by all mayors and village councils. The focus groups' main point of discussion involved wording in the informed consent, with little concern regarding the research question or privacy. Perhaps contrary to popular thought, we found each community we approached to be both welcoming and enthusiastic about collaborating in research on genomic diversity. The systematic method of engagement did much to preserve community respect and autonomy and facilitated buy-in.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; Focus groups; Genetics; Rural

Year:  2017        PMID: 28477297      PMCID: PMC5496842          DOI: 10.1007/s12687-017-0304-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Genet        ISSN: 1868-310X


  38 in total

1.  A national study of obesity prevalence and trends by type of rural county.

Authors:  J Elizabeth Jackson; Mark P Doescher; Anthony F Jerant; L Gary Hart
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.333

2.  Sharing news of a lung cancer diagnosis with adult family members and friends: a qualitative study to inform a supportive intervention.

Authors:  Gail Ewing; Nothando Ngwenya; John Benson; David Gilligan; Susan Bailey; Jane Seymour; Morag Farquhar
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2015-10-09

Review 3.  Variance in disease risk: rural populations and genetic diversity.

Authors:  W D Jenkins; A E Lipka; A J Fogleman; K R Delfino; R S Malhi; B Hendricks
Journal:  Genome       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 2.166

4.  Disparities by Race, Age, and Sex in the Improvement of Survival for Major Cancers: Results From the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program in the United States, 1990 to 2010.

Authors:  Chenjie Zeng; Wanqing Wen; Alicia K Morgans; William Pao; Xiao-Ou Shu; Wei Zheng
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 31.777

5.  Efficacy of the health belief model for predicting intention to pursue genetic testing for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Amanda Cyr; Tim Allen Dunnagan; George Haynes
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Public opinion about the importance of privacy in biobank research.

Authors:  David J Kaufman; Juli Murphy-Bollinger; Joan Scott; Kathy L Hudson
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Disclosing a cancer diagnosis to friends and family: a gendered analysis of young men's and women's experiences.

Authors:  Shona Hilton; Carol Emslie; Kate Hunt; Alison Chapple; Sue Ziebland
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2009-04-02

8.  Using community-based participatory research principles to develop more understandable recruitment and informed consent documents in genomic research.

Authors:  Harlyn G Skinner; Larissa Calancie; Maihan B Vu; Beverly Garcia; Molly DeMarco; Cam Patterson; Alice Ammerman; Jonathan C Schisler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Urban-rural disparities in colorectal cancer screening: cross-sectional analysis of 1998-2005 data from the Centers for Disease Control's Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Study.

Authors:  Allison M Cole; J Elizabeth Jackson; Mark Doescher
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 4.452

Review 10.  Opportunities to address lung cancer disparities among African Americans.

Authors:  Steven S Coughlin; Patricia Matthews-Juarez; Paul D Juarez; Courtnee E Melton; Mario King
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2014-09-14       Impact factor: 4.452

View more
  3 in total

1.  Perspectives on communication and engagement with regard to collecting biospecimens and family health histories for cancer research in a rural Alaska Native community.

Authors:  Lisa G Dirks; Jennifer L Shaw; Vanessa Y Hiratsuka; Julie A Beans; Janet J Kelly; Denise A Dillard
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2019-01-30

2.  Public perception of predictive cancer genetic testing and research in Oregon.

Authors:  Teala W Alvord; Lisa K Marriott; Phuc T Nguyen; Autumn Shafer; Kim Brown; Wesley Stoller; Jennifer L Volpi; Jill Vandehey-Guerrero; Laura K Ferrara; Steven Blakesley; Erin Solomon; Hannah Kuehl; Amy J Palma; Paige E Farris; Kelly J Hamman; Madisen Cotter; Jackilen Shannon
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  An Approach to Integrating Health Disparities within Undergraduate Biomedical Engineering Education.

Authors:  Maribel Vazquez; Otto Marte; Joseph Barba; Karen Hubbard
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 3.934

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.