Literature DB >> 28477254

A review of oxygen removal from oxygen-bearing coal-mine methane.

Peiyu Zhao1, Guojie Zhang2,3, Yinghui Sun1, Ying Xu1.   

Abstract

In this article, a comparison will be made concerning the advantages and disadvantages of five kinds of coal mine methane (CMM) deoxygenation method, including pressure swing adsorption, combustion, membrane separation, non-metallic reduction, and cryogenic distillation. Pressure swing adsorption has a wide range of application and strong production capacity. To achieve this goal, adsorbent must have high selectivity, adsorption capacity, and adequate adsorption/desorption kinetics, remain stable after several adsorption/desorption cycles, and possess good thermal and mechanical stabilities. Catalytic combustion deoxygenation is a high-temperature exothermic redox chemical reaction, which releases large amounts of thermal energy. So, the stable and accurate control of the temperature is not easy. Meanwhile partial methane is lost. The key of catalytic combustion deoxygenation lies in the development of high-efficiency catalyst. Membrane separation has advantages of high separation efficiency and low energy consumption. However, there are many obstacles, including higher costs. Membrane materials have the requirements of both high permeability and high selectivity. The development of new membrane materials is a key for membrane separation. Cryogenic distillation has many excellence advantages, such as high purity production and high recovery. However, the energy consumption increases with decreasing CH4 concentrations in feed gas. Moreover, there are many types of operational security problems. And that several kinds of deoxygenation techniques mentioned above have an economic value just for oxygen-bearing CMM with methane content above 30%. Moreover, all the above methods are not applicable to deoxygenation of low concentration CMM. Non-metallic reduction method cannot only realize cyclic utilization of deoxidizer but also have no impurity gases generation. It also has a relatively low cost and low loss rate of methane, and the oxygen is removed thoroughly. In particular, the non-metallic reduction method has good development prospects for low concentration oxygen-bearing CMM. This article also points out the direction of future development of coal mine methane deoxygenation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Catalyst; Deoxygenation; Non-metallic reduction; Oxygen-bearing coal mine methane; Pressure swing adsorption

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28477254     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-8916-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  2 in total

1.  Calculation of the upper flammability limit of methane/air mixtures at elevated pressures and temperatures.

Authors:  F Van den Schoor; F Verplaetsen; J Berghmans
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2007-09-29       Impact factor: 10.588

2.  High-performance PdNi alloy structured in situ on monolithic metal foam for coalbed methane deoxygenation via catalytic combustion.

Authors:  Qiaofei Zhang; Xin-Ping Wu; Guofeng Zhao; Yakun Li; Chunzheng Wang; Ye Liu; Xue-Qing Gong; Yong Lu
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 6.222

  2 in total
  2 in total

1.  Enhanced activity and stability of La-doped CeO2 monolithic catalysts for lean-oxygen methane combustion.

Authors:  Wenjun Zhu; Jianhui Jin; Xiao Chen; Chuang Li; Tonghua Wang; Chi-Wing Tsang; Changhai Liang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Experimental Study on the Physisorption Characteristics of O2 in Coal Powder are Effected by Coal Nanopore Structure.

Authors:  Bo Tan; Gang Cheng; Xiaoman Zhu; Xianbing Yang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.