Literature DB >> 28477229

Feasibility of the head-mounted display for ultrasound-guided nerve blocks: a pilot simulator study.

Yusuke Kasuya1, Shota Moriwaki2, Chiaki Inano2, Tomoko Fukada2, Ryu Komatsu3, Makoto Ozaki2.   

Abstract

The head-mounted display (HMD) has the potential to improve the quality of ultrasound-guided procedures. The aim of this non-clinical crossover designed study is to evaluate the feasibility of the HMD for ultrasound-guided nerve block. Eight experienced anesthesiologists performed ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks on a training simulator with a standard approach and with an upside-down approach. Each approach was performed with a control conventional method and with an HMD. The ultrasound image and operating field were recorded by video camera. The procedure time and fractional percentage of time with the needle visible on the ultrasound image were determined. The needle insertion times were 10.4 ± 7.2 s with the control method and 6.8 ± 5.3 s with the HMD method for the standard approach (p = 0.03), and 18.1 ± 10.1 with the control method and 11.8 ± 9.5 s with the HMD method for the upside-down approach (p = 0.002). The fractional percentages of time with the needle visible on the ultrasound image were 34.1 ± 20.9 with the control method and 56.5 ± 13.6% with the HMD method for the standard approach (p < 0.001), and 20.1 ± 13.4 with the control method and 38.2 ± 21.2% with the HMD method for the upside-down approach (p = 0.001). In conclusion, this pilot study using a simulation model indicated that the use of an HMD shortened the procedure time and improved the needle visibility on ultrasound.

Keywords:  Head-mounted display; In-plane method; Medical simulator; Ultrasound-guided nerve block

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28477229     DOI: 10.1007/s00540-017-2371-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anesth        ISSN: 0913-8668            Impact factor:   2.078


  10 in total

1.  Assessing the benefits of "gaze-down" display location in complex tasks.

Authors:  A M Omar; N J Wade; S I Brown; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-11-11       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Characterizing novice behavior associated with learning ultrasound-guided peripheral regional anesthesia.

Authors:  Brian D Sites; Brian C Spence; John D Gallagher; Christopher W Wiley; Marc L Bertrand; George T Blike
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.288

3.  Monitoring with head-mounted displays in general anesthesia: a clinical evaluation in the operating room.

Authors:  David Liu; Simon A Jenkins; Penelope M Sanderson; Perry Fabian; W John Russell
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 5.108

4.  Preliminary study of ergonomic behavior during simulated ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia using a head-mounted display.

Authors:  Ankeet D Udani; T Kyle Harrison; Steven K Howard; T Edward Kim; John G Brock-Utne; David M Gaba; Edward R Mariano
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  Clinical application of a modern high-definition head-mounted display in sonography.

Authors:  Hideki Takeshita; Kazunori Kihara; Soichiro Yoshida; Saori Higuchi; Masaya Ito; Yasukazu Nakanishi; Toshiki Kijima; Junichiro Ishioka; Yoh Matsuoka; Noboru Numao; Kazutaka Saito; Yasuhisa Fujii
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.153

6.  Iatrogenic jugular-carotid fistula despite ultrasound-guided vascular access.

Authors:  Manuel F Struck; Udo X Kaisers
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Pneumothorax following ultrasound-guided interscalene block: association or complication?

Authors:  Neil MacLennan; Chris Nixon
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Evaluation of laparoscopic performance with alteration in angle of vision.

Authors:  Caroline Ames; Alison J Frisella; Yan Yan; Peter Shulam; Jaime Landman
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  Monitoring with head-mounted displays: performance and safety in a full-scale simulator and part-task trainer.

Authors:  David Liu; Simon A Jenkins; Penelope M Sanderson; Marcus O Watson; Terrence Leane; Amanda Kruys; W John Russell
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.108

10.  Ultrasound-Guided Out-of-Plane vs. In-Plane Interscalene Catheters: A Randomized, Prospective Study.

Authors:  Eric S Schwenk; Kishor Gandhi; Jaime L Baratta; Marc Torjman; Richard H Epstein; Jaeyoon Chung; Benjamin A Vaghari; David Beausang; Elird Bojaxhi; Bernadette Grady
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2015-12-05
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.