Toby G Pavey1,2, Tracy L Kolbe-Alexander3, Leonie Uijtdewilligen4, Wendy J Brown3. 1. School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Brisbane, QLD, 4059, Australia. toby.pavey@qut.edu.au. 2. Centre for Research on Exercise, Physical Activity and Health, School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. toby.pavey@qut.edu.au. 3. Centre for Research on Exercise, Physical Activity and Health, School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. 4. Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Republic of Singapore.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Current Australian physical activity (PA) guidelines encourage adults to accumulate 150-300 min of moderate to vigorous PA each week. Some critics assert that 300 min is unachievable. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to identify the proportion of younger and mid-aged women who met the 300-min recommendation over a 12-year period, examine how the "highly active" women achieved this level of activity (in terms of walking, moderate activity, and vigorous activity), and to identify the sociodemographic, biological, lifestyle, and work-related determinants of being "highly active". METHODS: Younger (n = 7843) and mid-aged (n = 8043) participants in the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health completed triennial surveys between 2000 and 2013, when their ages were 24.6-36.3 and 52.5-64.5 years, respectively. Self-reported PA was assessed as time spent in walking, moderate activity, and vigorous activity in the previous week; an index of MET.min/week was derived and dichotomized as <1000 MET.min/week (<300 min; not highly active) or ≥1000 MET.min/week (≥300 min; highly active). Generalized estimating equations were used to examine univariable and multivariable associations between a number of sociodemographic, lifestyle, and health variables with PA status (measured at every survey). RESULTS: In the younger cohort, the proportion who were highly active decreased from 40% in 2000 to 31% in 2012. High levels of activity were achieved through a combination of walking (39.1-45.1% of total activity) and vigorous PA (41.8-47.7%). In the mid-age cohort, the proportion of women who were highly active increased from 32% in 2001 to 47% in 2013; this was achieved predominantly through walking (55.8-59.7%). In multi-variable models, the highest odds for being in the high PA category (odds ratios [ORs] ≥ 1.20; p < 0.001) were for younger women who were single, those who worked long full-time hours, those who drank any quantity of alcohol, and those who sat for less than 8 h/day. In the mid-age cohort, the highest odds for being in the high PA category (ORs ≥1.20; p < 0.001) were for women with post-school education, those who were retired, those who were low-risk drinkers (compared with non-drinkers), those who sat for less than 8 h/day, and those with lower levels of stress. DISCUSSION: Our findings clearly indicate that the upper limit of the Australian PA guidelines is achievable for large numbers of women. Factors associated with being highly active were different for younger and mid-age women, but healthy weight, high education, and paid work (full-time in the younger women, part-time in mid-age) were common characteristics of highly active women in both cohorts.
INTRODUCTION: Current Australian physical activity (PA) guidelines encourage adults to accumulate 150-300 min of moderate to vigorous PA each week. Some critics assert that 300 min is unachievable. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to identify the proportion of younger and mid-aged women who met the 300-min recommendation over a 12-year period, examine how the "highly active" women achieved this level of activity (in terms of walking, moderate activity, and vigorous activity), and to identify the sociodemographic, biological, lifestyle, and work-related determinants of being "highly active". METHODS: Younger (n = 7843) and mid-aged (n = 8043) participants in the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health completed triennial surveys between 2000 and 2013, when their ages were 24.6-36.3 and 52.5-64.5 years, respectively. Self-reported PA was assessed as time spent in walking, moderate activity, and vigorous activity in the previous week; an index of MET.min/week was derived and dichotomized as <1000 MET.min/week (<300 min; not highly active) or ≥1000 MET.min/week (≥300 min; highly active). Generalized estimating equations were used to examine univariable and multivariable associations between a number of sociodemographic, lifestyle, and health variables with PA status (measured at every survey). RESULTS: In the younger cohort, the proportion who were highly active decreased from 40% in 2000 to 31% in 2012. High levels of activity were achieved through a combination of walking (39.1-45.1% of total activity) and vigorous PA (41.8-47.7%). In the mid-age cohort, the proportion of women who were highly active increased from 32% in 2001 to 47% in 2013; this was achieved predominantly through walking (55.8-59.7%). In multi-variable models, the highest odds for being in the high PA category (odds ratios [ORs] ≥ 1.20; p < 0.001) were for younger women who were single, those who worked long full-time hours, those who drank any quantity of alcohol, and those who sat for less than 8 h/day. In the mid-age cohort, the highest odds for being in the high PA category (ORs ≥1.20; p < 0.001) were for women with post-school education, those who were retired, those who were low-risk drinkers (compared with non-drinkers), those who sat for less than 8 h/day, and those with lower levels of stress. DISCUSSION: Our findings clearly indicate that the upper limit of the Australian PA guidelines is achievable for large numbers of women. Factors associated with being highly active were different for younger and mid-age women, but healthy weight, high education, and paid work (full-time in the younger women, part-time in mid-age) were common characteristics of highly active women in both cohorts.
Entities:
Keywords:
High Physical Activity; Physical Activity; Vigorous Activity; Vigorous Physical Activity; Young Cohort
Authors: Léonie Uijtdewilligen; Geeske M E E Peeters; Jannique G Z van Uffelen; Jos W R Twisk; Amika S Singh; Wendy J Brown Journal: J Sci Med Sport Date: 2014-02-12 Impact factor: 4.319
Authors: Pedro C Hallal; Lars Bo Andersen; Fiona C Bull; Regina Guthold; William Haskell; Ulf Ekelund Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-07-21 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: F B Hu; R J Sigal; J W Rich-Edwards; G A Colditz; C G Solomon; W C Willett; F E Speizer; J E Manson Journal: JAMA Date: 1999-10-20 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Elina Engberg; Markku Alen; Katriina Kukkonen-Harjula; Juha E Peltonen; Heikki O Tikkanen; Heikki Pekkarinen Journal: Sports Med Date: 2012-05-01 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Patrick Bergman; Andrej M Grjibovski; Maria Hagströmer; Adrian Bauman; Michael Sjöström Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2008-10-22 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: S Baxter; M Johnson; N Payne; H Buckley-Woods; L Blank; E Hock; A Daley; A Taylor; T Pavey; G Mountain; E Goyder Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2016-02-01 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Francisco Martín-Rodríguez; José Luis Martín Conty; Verónica Casado Vicente; Pedro Arnillas Gómez; Alicia Mohedano-Moriano; Miguel Ángel Castro Villamor Journal: Emerg Med Int Date: 2018-10-16 Impact factor: 1.112