| Literature DB >> 28477158 |
Shiguan Le1, Wang Xi1, Wei Li1,2, Jian Xiao3, Zhinong Wang4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Forward surgical team (FST) is a highly mobile team for surgical missions in battlefield. FST training has been well held in many western countries. However, such training in Chinese army is far from satisfaction. METHODS ANDEntities:
Keywords: Combat Casualty; Global Rating Scale; Mass Casualty Incident; Training Center; Virtual Reality Training System
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28477158 PMCID: PMC5596042 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-017-4035-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Surg ISSN: 0364-2313 Impact factor: 3.352
Fig. 1CCST of Second Military Medical School
Fig. 2Mini center of CCST
Fig. 3Mini center in CCST
Fig. 4Making injury models on dogs
Surgical types and time probability distribution of forward surgical team
| Category | Surgical types | Median operation time (min) |
|---|---|---|
| Life-saving surgery | Amputation | 45 |
| Vessel repair | 60 | |
| Tracheotomy | 20 | |
| Open pneumothorax closure | 15 | |
| Closed drainage of pneumothorax | 9 | |
| Exploratory thoracotomy | 95 | |
| Peri-cardiocentesis | 35 | |
| Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation | 25 | |
| Exploratory laparotomy | 60 | |
| Craniotomy | 130 | |
| Extremity repair | 30 | |
| Damage control surgery | Packing hemostasis in parenchyma organ injuries | 45 |
| Hemostasis and bandaging in extremity | 10 | |
| Ligation | 20 | |
| Compartment syndrome decompression | 20 | |
| Severe open fracture fixation | 45 | |
| Debridement | 60 | |
| Hollow organs clamping | 20 | |
| Colostomy | 20 | |
| Lienal rupture repair | 45 | |
| Liver rupture repair | 60 | |
| Firearm injury debridement | 60 |
FST equipment
| Section | Group | Equipment |
|---|---|---|
| Life supplement | Basic installation | Tent *3 |
| Basic equipment | Sickbed *4, operating table *2, stretcher *6, oxygen cylinder *5 | |
| Damage control | Life support | Portable ventilator *2, Vscan *2, life support case *2 (Tracheotomy suite, intubation suite, Intravenous transfusion suite, intraosseous transfusion suite, CRBC, medicines), Triage suite *2 |
| Surgery | Portable anesthesia machine *2, portable monitor *3, general surgery case *2, orthopaedics surgery case *2, anesthesia case *2, surgical consumables case *5 | |
| Perioperative care | ICU | Portable ventilator *4, portable monitor *4, portable blood analyzer *1, ICU specific medical case *1 |
Fig. 5Possible layout of a forward surgical team
Fig. 6Performing surgeries in simulating scenarios
Global rating scale of operative performance. Please circle the number corresponding to the trainee’s performance in each category, irrespective of training level
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| Respect for tissue | Frequently used unnecessary force on tissue or caused damage by inappropriate use of instruments | Careful handing of tissue but occasionally caused inadvertent damage | Consistently handled tissue appropriately with minimal damage | ||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| Time and motion | Many unnecessary moves | Efficient time/motion but some unnecessary moves | Clear economy of movement and maximum efficiency | ||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| Instrument handling | Repeatedly makes tentative or awkward moves with instruments by inappropriate use of instrument | Competent use of instruments but occasionally appeared stiff or awkward | Fluid moves with instruments and no awkwardness | ||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| Knowledge of instruments | Frequently asked for wrong instrument or used inappropriate instrument | Knew names of most instruments and used appropriate instrument | Obviously familiar with the instruments and their names | ||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| Flow of operation | Frequently stopped operating and seemed unsure of next move | Demonstrated some forward planning with reasonable progression of procedure | Obviously planned course of operation with effortless flow from one move to the next | ||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| Use of assistants | Consistently placed assistants poorly or failed to use assistants | Appropriate use of assistants most of time | Strategically used assistants to the best advantage at all time | ||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| Knowledge of specific procedure | Deficient knowledge. Needed specific instruction at most steps | Knew all important steps of operation | Demonstrated familiarity with all aspects of operation |
Imperial College Assessment of Technical Skills for Nurses (ICATS-N)
| Core skill | Observable items | Scale | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gowning and gloving | Al. Gowning and gloving using closed method | N/A | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| A2. Placement of gloved hand: clasped mid-chest | N/A | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| A3. Back of gown closed using tag | N/A | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| Setting up instrumentation | B1. Established working area | N/A | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| B2. Individually count and name instrument with circulating nurse | N/A | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| B3. Count swabs in 5s, showing Raytex and tie | N/A | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| B4. Placement of sharps in kidney dish | N/A | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| B5. Prepare swabs for cleaning | N/A | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| Draping | C1. Ensure 2 team members drape together | N/A | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| C2. Hand drape over right-side up and without dragging (supporting drape); open tray drape in sterile manner | N/A | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| C3. First two sides, followed by bottom, followed by top | N/A | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| Maintaining sterile field | D1. Hand instrumentation to surgeon in a sterile manner without touching working end | N/A | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| D2. Anticipate surgeon’s needs (e.g., clip-clip-scissors-ties, suction, larger swabs) | N/A | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| D3. Have control of instrumentation and soiled swabs—i.e., no instruments lying on top of patient | N/A | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| D4. Posture and movement: when facing the trolley keep eye contact on procedure | N/A | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
N/A, Not applicable; 1, Not done at all; 6, Done very well
Operating-theater team non-technical skills assessment tool
| Leadership and management | |
| Leadership | Involves/reflects on suggestions/visible/accessible/inspires/motivates/coaches |
| Maintenance of standards | Subscribes to standards/monitors compliance to standards/intervenes if deviation/deviates with team approval/demonstrates desire to achieve high standards |
| Planning and preparation | Team participation in planning/plan is shared/understanding confirmed/projects/changes in consultation |
| Workload management | Distributes tasks/monitors/reviews/tasks are prioritised/allots adequate time/responds to stress |
| Authority and assertiveness | Advocates position/values team input/takes control/persistent/appropriate assertiveness |
| Teamwork and cooperation | |
| Team building/maintaining | Relaxed/supportive/open/inclusive/polite/friendly/use of humor/does not compete |
| Support of others | Helps others/offers assistance/gives feedback |
| Understanding team needs | Listens to others/recognizes ability of team/condition of others considered/gives personal feedback |
| Conflict solving | Keeps calm in conflicts/suggests conflict solutions/concentrates on what is right |
| Problem solving and decision making | |
| Definition and diagnosis | Uses all resources/analytical decision making/reviews factors with team |
| Option generation | Suggests alternative options/asks for options/reviews outcomes/confirms options |
| Risk assessment | Estimates risks/considers risk in terms of team capabilities/estimates patient outcome |
| Outcome review | Reviews outcomes/reviews new options/objective, constructive and timely reviews/makes time for review/seeks feedback from others/conducts post-treatment review |
| Situation awareness | |
| Notice | Considers all team elements/asks for or shares information/aware of available of resources/encourages vigilance/checks and reports changes in team/requests reports/updates |
| Understand | Knows capabilities/cross-checks above/shares mental models/speaks up when unsure/updates other team members/discusses team constraints |
| Think ahead | Identifies future problems/discusses contingencies/anticipates requirements |
Below standard behavior directly compromises patient safety and effective teamwork, Basic standard behavior in other conditions could directly compromise patient safety and effective teamwork, Standard behavior maintains an effective level of patient safety and teamwork, and Excellent behavior enhances patient safety and teamwork; a model for all other teams