Yi-Jun Kim1, Hyeon Kang Koh2, Eui Kyu Chie3, Do-Youn Oh4, Yung-Jue Bang4, Eun Mi Nam5, Kyubo Kim6. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine, 1071 Anyangcheon-ro, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul, 07985, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea. ekchie93@snu.ac.kr. 4. Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 5. Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 6. Department of Radiation Oncology, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine, 1071 Anyangcheon-ro, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul, 07985, Republic of Korea. kyubokim.ro@gmail.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate the significance of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) levels for survival in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). METHODS/PATIENTS: We retrospectively reviewed data from 97 LAPC patients treated with CCRT between 2000 and 2013. CA19-9 levels (initial and post-CCRT) and their changes [{(post-CCRT CA19-9 level - initial CA19-9 level)/(initial CA19-9 level)} × 100] were analyzed for overall survival. A cut-off point of 37 U/mL was used to analyze initial and post-CCRT CA19-9 levels. In order to define an optimal cut-off point for change in CA19-9 level, the maxstat package of R was applied. RESULTS: Median overall survival was 14.7 months (95% CI 13.4-16.0), and the 2-year survival rate was 16.5%. The estimated optimal cut-off point of CA19-9 level change was 94.4%. On univariate analyses, CA19-9 level change between initial and post-CCRT was significantly correlated with overall survival (median survival time 9.7 vs 16.3 months, p < 0.001). Multivariate analyses confirmed that CA19-9 level change from initial to post-CCRT was the only prognostic factor (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Change in CA19-9 level between initial and post-CCRT was a significant prognostic marker for overall survival in LAPC treated with CCRT. A CA19-9 level increase >94.4% might serve as a surrogate marker for poor survival in patients with LAPC undergoing CCRT, and the prognostic power surpassed other CA19-9 variables including initial and post-CCRT values.
PURPOSE: To investigate the significance of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) levels for survival in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). METHODS/PATIENTS: We retrospectively reviewed data from 97 LAPC patients treated with CCRT between 2000 and 2013. CA19-9 levels (initial and post-CCRT) and their changes [{(post-CCRT CA19-9 level - initial CA19-9 level)/(initial CA19-9 level)} × 100] were analyzed for overall survival. A cut-off point of 37 U/mL was used to analyze initial and post-CCRT CA19-9 levels. In order to define an optimal cut-off point for change in CA19-9 level, the maxstat package of R was applied. RESULTS: Median overall survival was 14.7 months (95% CI 13.4-16.0), and the 2-year survival rate was 16.5%. The estimated optimal cut-off point of CA19-9 level change was 94.4%. On univariate analyses, CA19-9 level change between initial and post-CCRT was significantly correlated with overall survival (median survival time 9.7 vs 16.3 months, p < 0.001). Multivariate analyses confirmed that CA19-9 level change from initial to post-CCRT was the only prognostic factor (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Change in CA19-9 level between initial and post-CCRT was a significant prognostic marker for overall survival in LAPC treated with CCRT. A CA19-9 level increase >94.4% might serve as a surrogate marker for poor survival in patients with LAPC undergoing CCRT, and the prognostic power surpassed other CA19-9 variables including initial and post-CCRT values.
Entities:
Keywords:
CA19-9; Concurrent chemoradiotherapy; Locally advanced pancreatic cancer
Authors: Helmut Oettle; Stefan Post; Peter Neuhaus; Klaus Gellert; Jan Langrehr; Karsten Ridwelski; Harald Schramm; Joerg Fahlke; Carl Zuelke; Christof Burkart; Klaus Gutberlet; Erika Kettner; Harald Schmalenberg; Karin Weigang-Koehler; Wolf-Otto Bechstein; Marco Niedergethmann; Ingo Schmidt-Wolf; Lars Roll; Bernd Doerken; Hanno Riess Journal: JAMA Date: 2007-01-17 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Woong Sub Koom; Jinsil Seong; Yong Bae Kim; Hae Ok Pyun; Si Young Song Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2008-08-28 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Jeffrey M Vainshtein; Matthew Schipper; Mark M Zalupski; Theodore S Lawrence; Ross Abrams; Isaac R Francis; Gazala Khan; William Leslie; Edgar Ben-Josef Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2012-12-19 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Walid L Shaib; Andrew Ip; Kenneth Cardona; Olatunji B Alese; Shishir K Maithel; David Kooby; Jerome Landry; Bassel F El-Rayes Journal: Oncologist Date: 2016-02-01
Authors: Adam C Berger; Miguel Garcia; John P Hoffman; William F Regine; Ross A Abrams; Howard Safran; Andre Konski; Alan B Benson; John MacDonald; Christopher G Willett Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-11-24 Impact factor: 44.544