Bas W M van Balkom1, Hendrik Gremmels2, Liselotte S S Ooms3, Raechel J Toorop4, Frank J M F Dor3,5, Olivier G de Jong2,6, Laura A Michielsen2, Gert J de Borst4, Wilco de Jager7, Alferso C Abrahams2, Arjan D van Zuilen2, Marianne C Verhaar2. 1. Departments of Nephrology and Hypertension and b.w.m.vanbalkom@umcutrecht.nl. 2. Departments of Nephrology and Hypertension and. 3. Division of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 4. Vascular Surgery, and. 5. Directorate of Renal and Transplant Services, Imperial College Healthcare National Health Service Trust, London, United Kingdom; and. 6. Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. 7. Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Kidney transplantation is the preferred treatment for ESRD, and donor kidney shortage urges proper donor-recipient matching. Zero-hour biopsies provide predictive values for short- and long-term transplantation outcomes, but are invasive and may not reflect the entire organ. Alternative, more representative methods to predict transplantation outcome are required. We hypothesized that proteins accumulating in preservation fluid during cold ischemic storage can serve as biomarkers to predict post-transplantation graft function. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Levels of 158 proteins were measured in preservation fluids from kidneys donated after circulatory death (Maastricht category III) collected in two Dutch centers (University Medical Center Utrecht and Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam) between 2013 and 2015. Five candidate biomarkers identified in a discovery set of eight kidneys with immediate function (IF) versus eight with delayed graft function (DGF) were subsequently analyzed in a verification set of 40 additional preservation fluids to establish a prediction model. RESULTS: Variables tested for their contribution to a prediction model included five proteins (leptin, periostin, GM-CSF, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, and osteopontin) and two clinical parameters (recipient body mass index [BMI] and dialysis duration) that distinguished between IF and DGF in the discovery set. Stepwise multivariable logistic regression provided a prediction model on the basis of leptin and GM-CSF. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.87, and addition of recipient BMI generated a model with an AUC of 0.89, outperforming the Kidney Donor Risk Index and the DGF risk calculator, showing AUCs of 0.55 and 0.59, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that donor kidney preservation fluid harbors biomarkers that, together with information on recipient BMI, predict short-term post-transplantation kidney function. Our approach is safe, easy, and performs better than current prediction algorithms, which are only on the basis of clinical parameters.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Kidney transplantation is the preferred treatment for ESRD, and donor kidney shortage urges proper donor-recipient matching. Zero-hour biopsies provide predictive values for short- and long-term transplantation outcomes, but are invasive and may not reflect the entire organ. Alternative, more representative methods to predict transplantation outcome are required. We hypothesized that proteins accumulating in preservation fluid during cold ischemic storage can serve as biomarkers to predict post-transplantation graft function. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Levels of 158 proteins were measured in preservation fluids from kidneys donated after circulatory death (Maastricht category III) collected in two Dutch centers (University Medical Center Utrecht and Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam) between 2013 and 2015. Five candidate biomarkers identified in a discovery set of eight kidneys with immediate function (IF) versus eight with delayed graft function (DGF) were subsequently analyzed in a verification set of 40 additional preservation fluids to establish a prediction model. RESULTS: Variables tested for their contribution to a prediction model included five proteins (leptin, periostin, GM-CSF, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, and osteopontin) and two clinical parameters (recipient body mass index [BMI] and dialysis duration) that distinguished between IF and DGF in the discovery set. Stepwise multivariable logistic regression provided a prediction model on the basis of leptin and GM-CSF. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.87, and addition of recipient BMI generated a model with an AUC of 0.89, outperforming the Kidney Donor Risk Index and the DGF risk calculator, showing AUCs of 0.55 and 0.59, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that donor kidney preservation fluid harbors biomarkers that, together with information on recipient BMI, predict short-term post-transplantation kidney function. Our approach is safe, easy, and performs better than current prediction algorithms, which are only on the basis of clinical parameters.
Authors: Wilco de Jager; Berent J Prakken; Johannes W J Bijlsma; Wietse Kuis; Ger T Rijkers Journal: J Immunol Methods Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 2.303
Authors: Raymond L Heilman; Maxwell L Smith; Byron H Smith; Ibrahim Qaqish; Hasan Khamash; Andrew L Singer; Bruce Kaplan; Kunam S Reddy Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2016-10-24 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Reka Korbély; Julia Wilflingseder; Paul Perco; Alexander Kainz; Robert M Langer; Bernd Mayer; Rainer Oberbauer Journal: Transpl Int Date: 2010-09-03 Impact factor: 3.782
Authors: H Le Dinh; L Weekers; C Bonvoisin; J M Krzesinski; J Monard; A de Roover; J P Squifflet; M Meurisse; O Detry Journal: Transplant Proc Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 1.066
Authors: C R Parikh; I E Hall; R S Bhangoo; J Ficek; P L Abt; H Thiessen-Philbrook; H Lin; M Bimali; P T Murray; V Rao; B Schröppel; M D Doshi; F L Weng; P P Reese Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2016-02-17 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Isaac E Hall; Sri G Yarlagadda; Steven G Coca; Zhu Wang; Mona Doshi; Prasad Devarajan; Won K Han; Richard J Marcus; Chirag R Parikh Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2009-09-17 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Sri G Yarlagadda; Steven G Coca; Richard N Formica; Emilio D Poggio; Chirag R Parikh Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2008-12-22 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: Johanna E Emmens; Martin H de Borst; Eva M Boorsma; Kevin Damman; Gerjan Navis; Dirk J van Veldhuisen; Kenneth Dickstein; Stefan D Anker; Chim C Lang; Gerasimos Filippatos; Marco Metra; Nilesh J Samani; Piotr Ponikowski; Leong L Ng; Adriaan A Voors; Jozine M Ter Maaten Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2022-02 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: S Inés Lozano-Ramos; Ioana Bancu; Laura Carreras-Planella; Marta Monguió-Tortajada; Laura Cañas; Javier Juega; Josep Bonet; M Pilar Armengol; Ricardo Lauzurica; Francesc E Borràs Journal: BMC Nephrol Date: 2018-07-31 Impact factor: 2.388
Authors: Hendrik Gremmels; Martin Teraa; Saskia C A de Jager; Gerard Pasterkamp; Gert J de Borst; Marianne C Verhaar Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-07-24 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Hendrik Gremmels; Olivier G de Jong; Raechel J Toorop; Laura Michielsen; Arjan D van Zuilen; Alexander V Vlassov; Marianne C Verhaar; Bas W M van Balkom Journal: Transplant Direct Date: 2019-08-12
Authors: Judith J De Haan; Saskia Haitjema; Hester M den Ruijter; Gerard Pasterkamp; Gert J de Borst; Martin Teraa; Marianne C Verhaar; Hendrik Gremmels; Saskia C A de Jager Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2017-08-30 Impact factor: 5.501