Literature DB >> 28476895

Regression of apoptosis-resistant colorectal tumors by induction of necroptosis in mice.

Gui-Wei He1, Claudia Günther1, Veronika Thonn1, Yu-Qiang Yu1, Eva Martini1, Barbara Buchen1, Markus F Neurath1, Michael Stürzl2, Christoph Becker3.   

Abstract

Cancer cells often acquire capabilities to evade cell death induced by current chemotherapeutic treatment approaches. Caspase-8, a central initiator of death receptor-mediated apoptosis, for example, is frequently inactivated in human cancers via multiple mechanisms such as mutation. Here, we show an approach to overcome cell death resistance in caspase-8-deficient colorectal cancer (CRC) by induction of necroptosis. In both a hereditary and a xenograft mouse model of caspase-8-deficient CRC, second mitochondria-derived activator of caspase (SMAC) mimetic treatment induced massive cell death and led to regression of tumors. We further demonstrate that receptor-interacting protein kinase 3 (RIP3), which is highly expressed in mouse models of CRC and in a subset of human CRC cell lines, is the deciding factor of cancer cell susceptibility to SMAC mimetic-induced necroptosis. Thus, our data implicate that it may be worthwhile to selectively evaluate the efficacy of SMAC mimetic treatment in CRC patients with caspase-8 deficiency in clinical trials for the development of more effective personalized therapy.
© 2017 He et al.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28476895      PMCID: PMC5460989          DOI: 10.1084/jem.20160442

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Med        ISSN: 0022-1007            Impact factor:   14.307


Introduction

Caspase-8 plays a central role in initiating apoptosis upon activation of death receptors by extrinsic factors such as TNF (Degterev et al., 2003). Recent studies have indicated that caspase-8 is frequently inactivated in human cancers via multiple mechanisms, including gene mutations, epigenetic modifications, and posttranslational changes (Fulda, 2009). The inactivation of caspase-8 in cancer cells can cause evasion of apoptosis, a hallmark of cancer that also represents a key mechanism of resistance to current cancer treatments (Hanahan and Weinberg, 2011). In line with this, mutated caspase-8 has been detected in human colorectal cancers (CRCs) and demonstrated to interfere with the recruitment of WT caspase-8 to activated death receptors in a dominant-negative fashion (Kim et al., 2003; Li et al., 2014). Importantly, a recent study has reported that caspase-8 mutations are found in ∼30% of hypermutated human CRCs (Cancer Genome Atlas Network, 2012). Until now, apoptosis resistance has remained a major clinical challenge for cancer treatment. Recent studies of cell death research have uncovered a novel function of caspase-8 in inhibiting receptor-interacting protein kinase 3 (RIP3)–dependent necroptosis (Vandenabeele et al., 2010). The inactivation of caspase-8 (for example by mutations, silencing, or pharmacological inhibition) is protective against apoptosis and renders cells highly susceptible to RIP3-mediated necroptotic cell death (He et al., 2009; Günther et al., 2011; Kaiser et al., 2011; Oberst et al., 2011), highlighting the potential to induce tumor cell necroptosis in apoptosis-resistant cancer patients. Second mitochondria-derived activator of caspase (SMAC) mimetics, a class of drugs that mimics the endogenous activity of SMACs, have proven safe in phase 1 clinical trials in cancer patients (Fulda and Vucic, 2012). By promoting ubiquitination of cellular inhibitor of apoptosis (cIAP) proteins, such as cIAP1 (Birc2) and cIAP2 (Birc3), SMAC mimetics foster degradation of cIAPs to activate apoptosis (Fulda and Vucic, 2012). Because of its proapoptotic function, SMAC is implicated in a broad spectrum of tumors, and small-molecule SMAC mimetics have been developed to improve current cancer treatments (Petersen et al., 2007). Recent studies on necroptosis in cell lines have demonstrated that SMAC mimetics can also promote formation of the ripoptosome, a necroptotic signaling complex comprising caspase-8, FADD, RIP1, and RIP3, when the activity of caspase-8 is blocked (He et al., 2009; Feoktistova et al., 2011). SMAC mimetics thus might represent an attractive new strategy for overcoming apoptosis resistance specifically in caspase-8–deficient CRCs by inducing necroptosis.

Results and discussion

Our recent studies have demonstrated an essential survival function of caspase-8 in regulating intestinal homeostasis by inhibiting intestinal epithelial cell (IEC) necroptosis (Günther et al., 2011, 2015; Wittkopf et al., 2013). In line with these studies, we found that mice with an IEC-specific deletion of caspase-8 (Casp8ΔIEC) showed enhanced accumulation of RIP3 protein in IECs (Fig. 1, A and B). We next investigated whether increased levels of RIP3 in caspase-8–deficient IECs could affect their susceptibility to SMAC mimetic treatment. Strikingly, oral administration of 50 mg/kg of the SMAC mimetic LCL161, which had no obvious effect on the epithelial structure of the gut from WT mice, induced complete tissue destruction shown by staining with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and β-catenin, accompanied by massive cell death in both the small intestine and colon of Casp8ΔIEC mice within only 24 h after treatment (Fig. 1 C and Fig. S1 A). The significant demise of the stem cell marker Olfm4 in small intestine and Lgr5 in both small intestine and colon 6 h after LCL161 treatment, a time point at which the surface of both small intestine and colon were still intact, suggests that SMAC mimetics cause a rapid loss of stem cells (Fig. S1, B and C). Furthermore, SMAC mimetic treatment, although safe for WT mice, led to 100% lethality in Casp8ΔIEC mice within 4 d (Fig. 1 D). The lethal phenotype after SMAC mimetic treatment could be completely rescued by further depletion of either Tnf receptor 1 (Casp8ΔIEC × Tnfr1−/−) or Rip3 (Casp8ΔIEC × Rip3−/−; Fig. 1 D). On a tissue level, both Casp8ΔIEC × Tnfr1−/− and Casp8ΔIEC × Rip3−/− mice were resistant to SMAC mimetic–induced tissue destruction and epithelial cell death in the gut, which was comparable to WT mice (Fig. 1 E). Collectively, these data showed that IECs with caspase-8 deficiency are hypersensitive to SMAC mimetic–induced necroptosis that required TNF receptor 1 signaling and RIP3.
Figure 1.

(A and B) RIP3 protein in colon tissues from the indicated mice was detected with immunoblots (β-actin served as a loading control; A) and immunostaining (B). Cell nuclei were counterstained with Hoechst 33342. Bars, 75 µm. (C–E) WT, Casp8ΔIEC, Casp8ΔIEC × Tnfr1−/−, and Casp8ΔIEC × Rip3−/− mice were treated with a single dose of 50 mg/kg LCL161 (oral). For histological analyses, tissues were collected 24 h after LCL161 administration. (C) Representative pictures of the small intestine and colon tissues from the indicated mice subjected to staining with H&E (left; bars, 75 µm), β-catenin (middle), and TUNEL (right). Cell nuclei were counterstained with Hoechst 33342. (D) Kaplan–Meier survival curve. Group sizes: n > 5. (E) Representative pictures of small intestine and colon tissue from the indicated mice stained with H&E (left; bars, 75 µm). Results from at least three biological replicates are presented unless otherwise specified. (D and E) Data derived from two independent animal experiments are shown.

(A and B) RIP3 protein in colon tissues from the indicated mice was detected with immunoblots (β-actin served as a loading control; A) and immunostaining (B). Cell nuclei were counterstained with Hoechst 33342. Bars, 75 µm. (C–E) WT, Casp8ΔIEC, Casp8ΔIEC × Tnfr1−/−, and Casp8ΔIEC × Rip3−/− mice were treated with a single dose of 50 mg/kg LCL161 (oral). For histological analyses, tissues were collected 24 h after LCL161 administration. (C) Representative pictures of the small intestine and colon tissues from the indicated mice subjected to staining with H&E (left; bars, 75 µm), β-catenin (middle), and TUNEL (right). Cell nuclei were counterstained with Hoechst 33342. (D) Kaplan–Meier survival curve. Group sizes: n > 5. (E) Representative pictures of small intestine and colon tissue from the indicated mice stained with H&E (left; bars, 75 µm). Results from at least three biological replicates are presented unless otherwise specified. (D and E) Data derived from two independent animal experiments are shown. To explore the implication of this finding for CRC treatment, we next sought to analyze the expression of necroptosis mediators in tumor cells. Intriguingly, in the ApcMin/+ mouse model of CRC, the mRNA level of Rip3 was approximately fourfold higher in tumors than in tumor-adjacent colon tissue, although no significant difference was observed in other necroptosis-related genes such as Mlkl, Casp8, Birc1, and Birc2 (Fig. 2 A). In agreement with this finding, Western blotting showed a marked increment of RIP3 protein in ApcMin/+ tumors compared with colon tissues (Fig. 2 B). Immunostaining further revealed that RIP3 was specifically up-regulated in tumor cells, but not in stromal cells (Fig. 2 C). Similar results were obtained when using a mouse model of colitis-associated cancer induced by a combination of azoxymethane (AOM)/dextran sodium sulfate (DSS; Fig. S1, D and E).
Figure 2.

Loss of caspase-8 sensitizes mouse colon tumors to SMAC mimetic. (A–C) Tumors and tumor-adjacent colon tissues were collected from 14-wk-old ApcMin/+ mice. (A) Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of gene expression indicated on the x axis. Gene expression was normalized to Hprt. Group sizes: n = 11; NS, P > 0.05; ***, P < 0.001. (B) Immunoblots of tissue extracts. (C) Immunostaining of colon cross sections with a RIP3 antibody. (D) Immunoblots of tumor tissue extracts from ApcMin/+ mice and ApcMin/+ Casp8ΔIEC mice. (B and D) β-Actin served as a loading control. (E) Tumor cross-sections from indicated mice were subjected to staining of H&E (left), cleaved caspase-3 (middle), and TUNEL (right). (F–H) ApcMin/+ mice and ApcMin/+ Casp8ΔIEC mice bearing size 4 tumors were intratumorally injected with LCL161 (100 µg/tumor). (F and G) The size of tumors was scored by colonoscopy every second day for 6 d. Group size: n = 5. (G) Representative colonoscopy imaging of tumors. (H) 2 d after injection of LCL161, tumors were collected for staining of H&E, mouse β-catenin (quantification is shown on the right), and TUNEL (quantification is shown on the right). **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001. Results from at least three biological replicates are presented unless otherwise specified. Data derived from two independent animal experiments are shown (F–H). Bars: (C) 500 µm; (E and H) 75 µm. Error bars indicate ±SD.

Loss of caspase-8 sensitizes mouse colon tumors to SMAC mimetic. (A–C) Tumors and tumor-adjacent colon tissues were collected from 14-wk-old ApcMin/+ mice. (A) Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of gene expression indicated on the x axis. Gene expression was normalized to Hprt. Group sizes: n = 11; NS, P > 0.05; ***, P < 0.001. (B) Immunoblots of tissue extracts. (C) Immunostaining of colon cross sections with a RIP3 antibody. (D) Immunoblots of tumor tissue extracts from ApcMin/+ mice and ApcMin/+ Casp8ΔIEC mice. (B and D) β-Actin served as a loading control. (E) Tumor cross-sections from indicated mice were subjected to staining of H&E (left), cleaved caspase-3 (middle), and TUNEL (right). (F–H) ApcMin/+ mice and ApcMin/+ Casp8ΔIEC mice bearing size 4 tumors were intratumorally injected with LCL161 (100 µg/tumor). (F and G) The size of tumors was scored by colonoscopy every second day for 6 d. Group size: n = 5. (G) Representative colonoscopy imaging of tumors. (H) 2 d after injection of LCL161, tumors were collected for staining of H&E, mouse β-catenin (quantification is shown on the right), and TUNEL (quantification is shown on the right). **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001. Results from at least three biological replicates are presented unless otherwise specified. Data derived from two independent animal experiments are shown (F–H). Bars: (C) 500 µm; (E and H) 75 µm. Error bars indicate ±SD. Given the increased levels of RIP3 in mouse tumor cells, we hypothesized that deficiency for caspase-8, such as it is observed in a group of CRC patients, could specifically sensitize tumors to SMAC mimetic–induced necroptosis. To test our hypothesis, we next crossed ApcMin/+ mice with Casp8ΔIEC mice to generate mice with caspase-8–deficient tumors (ApcMin/+ × Casp8ΔIEC). Although histological analysis showed no significant differences in cell death when comparing tumors from unchallenged ApcMin/+ mice and ApcMin/+ × Casp8ΔIEC mice, tumors with caspase-8 deficiency showed elevated levels of RIP3 protein (Fig. 2, D and E; and Fig. S1 F). This finding was in agreement with previous studies indicating that caspase-8 controls the cellular levels of RIP3 (Günther et al., 2011; Kaiser et al., 2011; Oberst et al., 2011). To avoid SMAC mimetic–induced epithelial destruction in the gut by systemic oral administration, we took advantage of interventional mouse colonoscopy and injected SMAC mimetics intratumorally (Becker et al., 2005; Neurath et al., 2010). Strikingly, local injection of LCL161 (100 µg/tumor) led to significant tumor reduction in ApcMin/+ × Casp8ΔIEC mice (from tumor size 4 to tumor size 1) in 6 d (Fig. 2, F and G). In contrast, the same dose of LCL161 did not reduce tumor size in caspase-8–proficient ApcMin/+ mice (Fig. 2, F and G). Histological analysis of tumors collected 2 d after injection showed that LCL161 induced extensive tumor cell death and loss of β-catenin staining in ApcMin/+ × Casp8ΔIEC mice, but not in ApcMin/+ mice (Fig. 2 H). Collectively, these data showed that deficient caspase-8 expression sensitizes mouse colon tumors to SMAC mimetic treatment. Given that RIP3 plays a crucial role in necroptosis, we next asked whether RIP3 is a key factor of SMAC mimetic–induced necroptosis in human CRC cells. To address this question, we analyzed the expression of members of the necroptotic pathway in a panel of six human CRC cell lines (HT-29, HCT116, SW480, SW620, Caco2, and DLD-1). Compared with other necroptosis-regulating genes, including MLKL, RIP1, CASP8, and FADD, the mRNA levels of RIP3 varied mostly among these cell lines (Fig. S2 A). In line with this, immunoblot further confirmed that RIP3 is also highly expressed on the protein level in HT-29 cells but weakly expressed in SW480 and SW620 cells and not detectable in HCT116, Caco2, and DLD-1 cells (Fig. S2 B). Intriguingly, the expression levels of RIP3 in these human cancer cells predicted susceptibility to SMAC mimetic–induced necroptosis in the presence of the caspase inhibitor Z-VAD-FMK (zVAD) in vitro (Fig. S2, C and D). Given these findings, we next tested SMAC mimetic treatment in caspase-8–deficient human CRC cells. Using CRISPR-Cas9 technology, we generated a caspase-8 knocked out HT-29 cell line (C8KO; Fig. 3 A). In contrast to control HT-29 cells, SMAC mimetic treatment induced a sharp decrease in the cell index as measured by xCELLigence real-time analysis (Fig. S2 E). Using propidium iodide staining, we found that within only 24 h, more than 80% of C8KO cells, but only few control cells, succumbed to SMAC mimetic treatment in vitro (Fig. 3 B). Strikingly, caspase-8 deficiency reduced the half-maximal effective concentration of LCL161 in 48 h by 10,000-fold (Fig. S2 F). Using Western blotting, we observed increased levels of the RIP3 substrate MLKL phosphorylated at Ser358 in C8KO cells upon LCL161 stimulation, indicating that these cells might undergo necroptosis (Fig. 3 C). Indeed, preincubation with inhibitors of TNF (Enbrel), RIP1 (necrostatin-1 [Nec-1]), or MLKL (necrosulfonamide [NAS]) completely protected C8KO cells from LCL161-induced cell death (Fig. 3 D and Fig. S2 G). Moreover, tumor cells with low, but not absent, caspase-8 expression generated by shRNA transfection were also significantly susceptible to SMAC mimetic–induced necroptosis in vivo (Fig. S3, F–H). Although TNF expression was elevated approximately eightfold in C8KO stimulated with LCL161 as compared with treated HT-29 control cells, neither C8KO cells treated with TNF nor HT-29 cells treated with TNF and LCL161 induced significant cell death (Fig. S2, H and I). This implies that caspase-8 deficiency sensitized HT-29 cells to SMAC mimetic–induced necroptosis by cell-intrinsic mechanisms.
Figure 3.

(A–D) In vitro effect of SMAC mimetic on HT-29 cells and caspase-8–knockout C8KO cells generated with CRISPR/Cas9 plasmids. (B and D) Error bars indicate +SD. (A) Validation of caspase-8–knockout efficiency with immunoblots. β-Actin served as a loading control. (B) Cell death assay with propidium iodide staining followed by flow cytometry analysis. (C) Immunoblot of phospho-MLKL (S358) in the indicated cells treated with DMSO or 100 nM LCL161 for 18 h. An HT-29 cell treated with 20 ng/ml TNF (T) + 100 nM SMAC mimetic (S) + 20 µM zVAD (Z) served as a positive control. (D) Cell death assay with propidium iodide staining followed by flow cytometry analysis. Enbrel, Nec1, and NAS were added 30 min before LCL161. (E–I) Mice with established subcutaneous HT-29/HT-29-luc-D6 tumors (left side tumors) and C8KO/C8KO-luc-D6 tumors (right side tumors) were treated with PBS (mock) or 50 mg/kg LCL161 (oral) every second day. Tumor growth was monitored for 12 d by caliper (E) and in vivo imaging (F) measurements. Error bars indicate ±SD; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01. (G–I) Tumors from mice treated with LCL161 for 3 d were stained with H&E (bars, 100 µm), human β-catenin (bars, 100 µm), or TUNEL (bars, 75 µm). Results from at least three biological replicates are presented unless otherwise specified. Data are derived from two independent animal experiments (E–I).

(A–D) In vitro effect of SMAC mimetic on HT-29 cells and caspase-8–knockout C8KO cells generated with CRISPR/Cas9 plasmids. (B and D) Error bars indicate +SD. (A) Validation of caspase-8–knockout efficiency with immunoblots. β-Actin served as a loading control. (B) Cell death assay with propidium iodide staining followed by flow cytometry analysis. (C) Immunoblot of phospho-MLKL (S358) in the indicated cells treated with DMSO or 100 nM LCL161 for 18 h. An HT-29 cell treated with 20 ng/ml TNF (T) + 100 nM SMAC mimetic (S) + 20 µM zVAD (Z) served as a positive control. (D) Cell death assay with propidium iodide staining followed by flow cytometry analysis. Enbrel, Nec1, and NAS were added 30 min before LCL161. (E–I) Mice with established subcutaneous HT-29/HT-29-luc-D6 tumors (left side tumors) and C8KO/C8KO-luc-D6 tumors (right side tumors) were treated with PBS (mock) or 50 mg/kg LCL161 (oral) every second day. Tumor growth was monitored for 12 d by caliper (E) and in vivo imaging (F) measurements. Error bars indicate ±SD; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01. (G–I) Tumors from mice treated with LCL161 for 3 d were stained with H&E (bars, 100 µm), human β-catenin (bars, 100 µm), or TUNEL (bars, 75 µm). Results from at least three biological replicates are presented unless otherwise specified. Data are derived from two independent animal experiments (E–I). To ultimately demonstrate that SMAC mimetic alone is sufficient to induce regression of caspase-8–deficient human colorectal tumors, we took advantage of an established xenograft model. Accordingly, we generated caspase-8–knockout HT-29 cells additionally carrying a luciferase expression cassette (HT-29-luc-D6) to track the cells in vivo. Cells were injected subcutaneously into Rag1−/− mice, and tumor development was monitored over time. Strikingly, oral administration of LCL161 resulted in rapid and substantial regression of C8KO-luc-D6 tumors measured by both a digital caliper and in vivo bioluminescent imaging, whereas caspase-8–proficient HT-29-luc-D6–derived tumors showed no significant difference in tumor development after treatment (Fig. 3, E and F). Accordingly, RT-PCR analysis of tumor tissues showed that the level of TNFA is elevated approximately eightfold in SMAC mimetic–treated C8KO tumors in comparison to treated HT-29 tumors and both untreated tumors (Fig. S3 A). Histological analysis revealed a massive loss of tumor cells stained with β-catenin and a great reduction in proliferating cells stained with Ki67 only in C8KO-luc-D6–derived tumors from SMAC mimetic–treated mice (Fig. 3, G and H; and Fig. S3, B, C, and E). The majority of cell death events were negative for cleaved caspase-3, indicating that these cells died of necroptosis rather than apoptosis (Fig. 3 I and Fig. S3 D). Moreover, tumor cells with low rather than absent caspase-8 were also significantly susceptible to SMAC mimetic–induced necroptosis in vivo (Fig. S3, I and J). Collectively, these data demonstrate that SMAC mimetic alone is efficient to treat human tumors deficient in caspase-8 in vivo. In conclusion, our data provided solid evidence that SMAC mimetic alone is efficient to treat colorectal tumors with caspase-8 deficiency in both a hereditary and a xenograft mouse model. Of note, multiple lines of evidence have revealed that caspase-8 expression is frequently absent in many types of human cancers via multiple mechanisms. In particular, complete inactivation of caspase-8 has been identified in human neuroblastomas through DNA methylation and gene deletion (Hopkins-Donaldson et al., 2000; Teitz et al., 2000; Pingoud-Meier et al., 2003). Caspase-8 deficiency is frequently found in human CRCs refractory to current therapeutic approaches via evasion of apoptosis. Importantly, a functional study has indicated that caspase-8 mutations found in human CRC can markedly decrease apoptosis activity, and these mutants showed a dominant-negative inhibition of death receptor–induced apoptosis (Kim et al., 2003). These studies have clearly demonstrated the relevance of caspase-8 deficiency in human cancer, including CRC. Our findings therefore represent an attractive strategy for overcoming apoptosis resistance by inducing necroptosis. Given that several SMAC mimetics are being evaluated in clinical trials in cancer patients, our study suggests that it may be worthwhile to selectively evaluate the efficacy of SMAC mimetics treatment in CRC patients with caspase-8 deficiency for the development of a more effective personalized therapy.

Materials and methods

Mice

Mice carrying a loxP-flanked caspase-8 allele (Casp8fl) and villin-Cre mice were described earlier (Madison et al., 2002; El Marjou et al., 2004; Beisner et al., 2005). Casp8ΔIEC mice, Casp8ΔIEC × Tnfr1−/−, and Casp8ΔIEC × Rip3−/− mice were previously used in our studies (Günther et al., 2011, 2015). For SMAC mimetic treatment, the LCL161 orally bioavailable chemical compound (gift of D. Porter, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Boston, MA) was dissolved in PBS with 0.73% of 0.1 N HCl and was orally administered to mice (50 mg/kg) except for intratumoral injection. Experiments were performed under protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Erlangen.

Cell culture

All human CRC cell lines were cultured in DMEM (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FCS (Invitrogen) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Invitrogen) and maintained at 37°C and 5% CO2. HT-29, HCT116, SW480, SW620, Caco2, and DLD-1 cancer cell lines were from ATCC. The luciferase expressing cell line HT-29-luc-D6 was from PerkinElmer. All cell cultures were free of mycoplasma contamination.

Cell death assay

For the induction of necroptosis, either 100 nM LCL161 alone or a combination of 100 nM LCL161, 20 ng/ml TNF (R&D Systems), and 20 µM zVAD (Bachem) was used as indicated. For the inhibition of necroptosis, 5 µg/ml Enbrel (Pfizer), 10 µM Nec1 (Bachem), and 1 µM NAS (EMD Millipore) were added 30 min before LCL161. Cells were stained with propidium iodide and analyzed with flow cytometry (LSR Fortessa II; BD). Alternatively, cell culture supernatant was collected for LDH assay.

Stable cell line generation

Caspase-8–knockout cell lines were generated from human adenocarcinoma cell line HT-29 (ATCC) and a luciferase-expressing cell line HT-29-luc-D6 (Caliper) using CRISPR/Cas9 KO Plasmid (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) according to the protocol of the supplier. For generation of single-cell colonies, GFP-positive cells were sorted into 96-well plates (one cell/well) by flow cytometry (FACSAria II; BD). For the creation of stable cell lines with lower caspase-8 expression, HT-29 cells were transfected with retroviral plasmids of negative control shRNA or caspase-8 shRNA (TG305635; OriGene). The transfected cells were cultured in growth medium containing 1 μg/ml puromycin for selection.

Immunoblotting

Proteins were isolated from cells or tissues using Mammalian Protein Extraction reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific) supplemented with protease inhibitors (Complete Mini Protease Inhibitor Cocktail; Roche) and phosphatase inhibitors (PhosphoStop Phosphatase Inhibitor Cocktail; Roche). Proteins were separated using a MiniProtean-TGX gel (4–15% polyacrylamide; Bio-Rad Laboratories) and transferred from the gel to a nitrocellulose membrane (Whatman). Membranes were probed with the following primary antibodies: anti–mouse RIP3 (ADI-905-242-100; Enzo Life Sciences), anti–human RIP3 (13526; Cell Signaling Technology), anti–mouse cleaved caspase-8 (8592; Cell Signaling Technology), anti–caspase-8 (4790; Cell Signaling Technology), anti–human phospho-MLKL (S358, ab187091; Abcam), and HRP-linked β-actin (ab49900; Abcam). HRP-linked anti–rabbit IgG (7074; Cell Signaling Technology) was used as a secondary antibody.

Real-time quantitative RT-PCR

Total RNA was extracted from cells and tissues using the peqGOLD MicroSpin Total RNA kit and peqGOLD Total RNA kit (Peqlab), respectively. cDNA was synthesized using the SCRIPT cDNA Synthesis kit from Jena Bioscience and analyzed by real-time PCR using specific QuantiTect Primer assays (QIAGEN). Experimental values were normalized to levels of the housekeeping gene hypoxanthine guanine phosphoribosyl transferase (HPRT).

xCELLigence

The cell index was monitored with an xCELLigence Real-Time Cell Analyzer (RTCA) instrument with E-Plate 16 (Roche) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The cell index was normalized with the RTCA software 1.2.1 (Roche).

Tumor models

For HT-29 xenograft model, 2 × 106 cancer cells were injected subcutaneously in 100 µl PBS into the flanks of 6–10-wk-old Rag1−/− mice as indicated. One week later, mice bearing palpable tumors were orally administered 50 mg/kg vehicle or LCL161 every second day. Tumors were measured at serial time points after LCL161 treatment using a digital caliper and the tumor volume was calculated using V = (length × width × height)/2. For ApcMin/+ model, 14-wk-old mice bearing colon tumors were orally administered a single dose of 50 mg/kg LCL161, and tumors were collected 24 h later. For intratumoral injection, mice bearing colon tumors of size 4 were used. A single dose of LCL161 (100 µg/tumor) was injected directly into the tumor using colonoscopy, and the tumor was scored with colonoscopy every second day as previously described (Becker et al., 2005; Neurath et al., 2010). For the AOM/DSS model, we followed a previously described protocol to induce colon tumors in WT B6 mice (Neufert et al., 2007).

In vivo bioluminescent assay

Mice bearing HT-29-luc-D6 tumor and caspase-8–knockout HT-29-luc-D6 (HT-29-luc-D6-C8KO) tumors were injected i.p. with 10 µl/g body weight of Luciferin (Promega) in 100 µl PBS and imaged with IVIS Lumina (PerkinElmer).

Histology and immunofluorescence

Histopathological analyses were performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue after Mayer’s H&E staining. Immunofluorescence of tissue sections was performed using the TSA Cy3 system as recommended by the manufacturer (PerkinElmer). Anti–mouse RIP3 (ADI-905-242-100; Enzo Life Sciences), anti–mouse β-catenin (8480; Cell Signaling Technology), and anti–human β-catenin (4176; Cell Signaling Technology) antibodies were used for immunofluorescence staining. Nuclei were counterstained with Hoechst 3342 (Invitrogen). Cell death was determined by TUNEL (terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling) analysis using the in situ cell death detection kit (Roche). Images were obtained using the microscope Leica DMI 4000B (Leica Microsystems).

Statistics

A two-tailed Student’s t test was applied to calculate statistical significance of the difference in sample means (*, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.01; ***, P ≤ 0.001; N.S., not significant; SD).

Online supplemental material

Fig. S1 shows additional data supporting that SMAC mimetic induces necroptosis in mouse IECs and tumor cells. Fig. S2 shows additional data supporting that SMAC mimetic induces necroptosis in human CRC cell lines in vitro. Fig. S3 shows additional data supporting that SMAC mimetic induces necroptosis in a xenograft model of human CRC.
  25 in total

1.  Caspase 8 is deleted or silenced preferentially in childhood neuroblastomas with amplification of MYCN.

Authors:  T Teitz; T Wei; M B Valentine; E F Vanin; J Grenet; V A Valentine; F G Behm; A T Look; J M Lahti; V J Kidd
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 53.440

2.  In vivo imaging of colitis and colon cancer development in mice using high resolution chromoendoscopy.

Authors:  C Becker; M C Fantini; S Wirtz; A Nikolaev; R Kiesslich; H A Lehr; P R Galle; M F Neurath
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 3.  Molecular mechanisms of necroptosis: an ordered cellular explosion.

Authors:  Peter Vandenabeele; Lorenzo Galluzzi; Tom Vanden Berghe; Guido Kroemer
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 94.444

4.  Assessment of tumor development and wound healing using endoscopic techniques in mice.

Authors:  Markus F Neurath; Nadine Wittkopf; Alexandra Wlodarski; Maximilian Waldner; Clemens Neufert; Stefan Wirtz; Claudia Günther; Christoph Becker
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2010-10-16       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Autocrine TNFalpha signaling renders human cancer cells susceptible to Smac-mimetic-induced apoptosis.

Authors:  Sean L Petersen; Lai Wang; Asligul Yalcin-Chin; Lin Li; Michael Peyton; John Minna; Patrick Harran; Xiaodong Wang
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 31.743

6.  Caspase-8 mutations in head and neck cancer confer resistance to death receptor-mediated apoptosis and enhance migration, invasion, and tumor growth.

Authors:  Changyou Li; Ann Marie Egloff; Malabika Sen; Jennifer R Grandis; Daniel E Johnson
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 6.603

7.  Loss of caspase-8 protein expression correlates with unfavorable survival outcome in childhood medulloblastoma.

Authors:  Carmen Pingoud-Meier; Doris Lang; Anna J Janss; Lucy B Rorke; Peter C Phillips; Tarek Shalaby; Michael A Grotzer
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Comprehensive molecular characterization of human colon and rectal cancer.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  RIP3 mediates the embryonic lethality of caspase-8-deficient mice.

Authors:  William J Kaiser; Jason W Upton; Alyssa B Long; Devon Livingston-Rosanoff; Lisa P Daley-Bauer; Razqallah Hakem; Tamara Caspary; Edward S Mocarski
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Caspase-8 controls the gut response to microbial challenges by Tnf-α-dependent and independent pathways.

Authors:  Claudia Günther; Barbara Buchen; Gui-Wei He; Mathias Hornef; Natalia Torow; Helmut Neumann; Nadine Wittkopf; Eva Martini; Marijana Basic; André Bleich; Alastair J M Watson; Markus F Neurath; Christoph Becker
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 23.059

View more
  34 in total

1.  Interferon regulatory factor 1 regulates PANoptosis to prevent colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Rajendra Karki; Bhesh Raj Sharma; Ein Lee; Balaji Banoth; R K Subbarao Malireddi; Parimal Samir; Shraddha Tuladhar; Harisankeerth Mummareddy; Amanda R Burton; Peter Vogel; Thirumala-Devi Kanneganti
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2020-06-18

2.  Sensing plasma membrane pore formation induces chemokine production in survivors of regulated necrosis.

Authors:  Weihong Wang; Joshua S Prokopec; Yixin Zhang; Maria Sukhoplyasova; Himaly Shinglot; Man-Tzu Wang; Andreas Linkermann; Jacob Stewart-Ornstein; Yi-Nan Gong
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 12.270

Review 3.  Regulated cell death (RCD) in cancer: key pathways and targeted therapies.

Authors:  Fu Peng; Minru Liao; Rui Qin; Shiou Zhu; Cheng Peng; Leilei Fu; Yi Chen; Bo Han
Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther       Date:  2022-08-13

4.  Rubiarbonol B induces RIPK1-dependent necroptosis via NOX1-derived ROS production.

Authors:  Hee Sun Byun; Eunjin Ju; Kyeong Ah Park; Kyung-Cheol Sohn; Chan Seok Jung; Jang Hee Hong; Hyunju Ro; Hoi Young Lee; Khong Trong Quan; InWha Park; MinKyun Na; Gang Min Hur
Journal:  Cell Biol Toxicol       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 6.819

Review 5.  Understanding Necroptosis in Pancreatic Diseases.

Authors:  Ru He; Zhengfeng Wang; Shi Dong; Zhou Chen; Wence Zhou
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2022-06-13

6.  Gut epithelial TSC1/mTOR controls RIPK3-dependent necroptosis in intestinal inflammation and cancer.

Authors:  Yadong Xie; Yifan Zhao; Lei Shi; Wei Li; Kun Chen; Min Li; Xia Chen; Haiwei Zhang; Tiantian Li; Yu Matsuzawa-Ishimoto; Xiaomin Yao; Dianhui Shao; Zunfu Ke; Jian Li; Yan Chen; Xiaoming Zhang; Jun Cui; Shuzhong Cui; Qibin Leng; Ken Cadwell; Xiaoxia Li; Hong Wei; Haibing Zhang; Huabin Li; Hui Xiao
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 7.  Genetic and biological hallmarks of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Jiexi Li; Xingdi Ma; Deepavali Chakravarti; Shabnam Shalapour; Ronald A DePinho
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 8.  Receptor-interacting protein in malignant digestive neoplasms.

Authors:  Lilong Zhang; Wenyi Guo; Jia Yu; Chunlei Li; Man Li; Dongqi Chai; Weixing Wang; Wenhong Deng
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 4.207

9.  Somatic Epigenetic Silencing of RIPK3 Inactivates Necroptosis and Contributes to Chemoresistance in Malignant Mesothelioma.

Authors:  Yinfei Tan; Eleonora Sementino; Mitchell Cheung; Suraj Peri; Craig W Menges; Anna-Mariya Kukuyan; Ting Zhang; Vladimir Khazak; Lauren A Fox; Eric A Ross; Suresh Ramanathan; Suresh C Jhanwar; Raja M Flores; Siddharth Balachandran; Joseph R Testa
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 13.801

Review 10.  MOMP, cell suicide as a BCL-2 family business.

Authors:  Halime Kalkavan; Douglas R Green
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 15.828

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.