Literature DB >> 28476487

A randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of two HMG preparations gaining their LH bioactivity from different HCG sources.

Gillian Lockwood1, Barbara Cometti2, Jeanette Bogstad3, Karin Erb4, Christian De Geyter5, Janos Urbancsek6, Silvia Trevisan7, Khaled Pocate-Cheriet8, Dominique de Ziegler8.   

Abstract

In this prospective, controlled, randomized, multicentre, non-inferiority study, efficacy and safety of two HMG preparations (Menopur®- Ferring and Meriofert®- IBSA Institut Biochimique SA) for ovarian stimulation were compared (270 women undergoing IVF aged between 18 and 39 years; BMI 30 kg/m2 or less; less than three prior completed assisted reproduction technique cycles). A standard long down-regulation with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist protocol, with HCG triggering was used; primary end-point was total number of oocytes retrieved; attention was paid toovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). No statistically significant differences between the treatment groups were reported for most of the clinically significant end-points, including embryo quality, fertilization rate, implantation rate, ongoing pregnancy rate and live birth rate. Total number of oocytes retrieved was higher in the new HMG group compared with the reference (11.6 ± 6.6 and 9.7 ± 5.9, respectively, with a 95% CI of the difference equal +0.43 to +3.43). Increased number of oocytes was obtained through a shorter stimulation, but HMG units per oocyte retrieved were equivalent. The safety profile of the products for frequency of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome was the same. This study showed that the new HMG preparation is a viable alternative for conducting ovarian stimulation in IVF cycles.
Copyright © 2017 IBSA Institut Biochimique SA. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assisted reproduction; HCG; HMG; IVF; Ovarian stimulation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28476487     DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.03.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  2 in total

1.  Consecutive versus concomitant follicle-stimulating hormone and highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin: A milder response but better quality.

Authors:  Hassan Ali Maghraby; Abdel Fattah Mohamed Agameya; Manal Shafik Swelam; Nermeen Ahmed El Dabah; Ola Youssef Ahmed
Journal:  Clin Exp Reprod Med       Date:  2022-05-30

2.  Assessment of the immunogenicity of gonadotrophins during controlled ovarian stimulation.

Authors:  Carles Morte; Carles Celma; Christian De Geyter; Janos Urbancsek; Buenaventura Coroleu Lletget; Barbara Cometti
Journal:  Am J Reprod Immunol       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 3.886

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.