Literature DB >> 28475808

Measuring the anaesthesia clinical learning environment at the department level is feasible and reliable.

D J Castanelli1,2, N A Smith3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The learning environment describes the context and culture in which trainees learn. In order to establish the feasibility and reliability of measuring the anaesthetic learning environment in individual departments we implemented a previously developed instrument in hospitals across New South Wales.
METHODS: We distributed the instrument to trainees from 25 anaesthesia departments and supplied summarized results to individual departments. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed to assess internal structure validity and generalizability theory was used to calculate reliability. The number of trainees required for acceptable precision in results was determined using the standard error of measurement.
RESULTS: We received 172 responses (59% response rate). Suitable internal structure validity was confirmed. Measured reliability was acceptable (G-coefficient 0.69) with nine trainees per department. Eight trainees were required for a 95% confidence interval of plus or minus 0.25 in the mean total score. Eight trainees as assessors also allow a 95% confidence interval of approximately plus or minus 0.3 in the subscale mean scores. Results for individual departments varied, with scores below the expected level recorded on individual subscales, particularly the 'teaching' subscale.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm that, using this instrument, individual departments can obtain acceptable precision in results with achievable trainee numbers. Additionally, with the exception of departments with few trainees, implementation proved feasible across a training region. Repeated use would allow departments or accrediting bodies to monitor their individual learning environment and the impact of changes such as the introduction of new curricular elements, or local initiatives to improve trainee experience.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com

Entities:  

Keywords:  anaesthesia; educational assessment; graduate medical education; learning environment

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28475808     DOI: 10.1093/bja/aex037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  2 in total

1.  The clinical learning environment in anaesthesiology in Kerala---Is it good enough?---A web-based survey.

Authors:  Priyanka Pavithran; Suvarna Kaniyil; M C Rajesh; Vijish Venugopal; T N Jitin; Azeem Davul
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2021-03-13

2.  Problem-based learning for anesthesia resident operating room crisis management training.

Authors:  Nobuyasu Komasawa; Benjamin W Berg; Toshiaki Minami
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.