Literature DB >> 28474668

Correlation between the levels of SpO2and PaO2.

Arun Madan1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28474668      PMCID: PMC5427770          DOI: 10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_106_17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lung India        ISSN: 0970-2113


× No keyword cloud information.
Sir, Sarkar et al. in 2017, in their recent article,[1] have very nicely elucidated various mechanisms of hypoxemia, and I would like to congratulate them for this endeavor. In continuation, I would like to offer the following hypothesis which correlates well between the levels of hemoglobin saturation (SpO2) and partial pressure of oxygen in the arterial blood (PaO2). We keep on looking arterial blood gas (ABG) reports and keenly watch multi-monitors in Intensive Care Units (ICUs) and wards. As standard teaching, we have a certain image and interpretation of high and low SpO2 and PaO2 reports.[2] The sigmoid shape of the oxy–hemoglobin (Hb) dissociation curve reflects the cooperative interaction between Hb and oxygen (O2) molecules. The oxy–Hb dissociation curve is initially steep and then flattens out (sigmoid shape). The most important aspect of the curve is that as the oximeter reading falls below 90%, the PaO2 drops very rapidly and O2 delivery to the tissues is reduced and leads to irreversible brain damage and cardiac arrest. The understanding of sigmoidal-shaped oxy–Hb dissociation curve comes very handy in these situations [Figure 1]. O2 saturation varies with the PaO2 in a nonlinear relationship and is affected by temperature, pH, 2,3 diphosphoglycerate, and PaCO2 (partial pressure of carbon dioxide in the arterial blood).[3] Above 90 mmHg of PaO2, the curve becomes almost flat, and there is a small rise in SpO2 in spite of big increments in PaO2. The flat upper part acts as a buffer in the sense that the PaO2 can drop to about 60 mmHg and yet the Hb will still remain highly saturated (90%) with O2. The steep lower part also has big advantage in that if the tissues require more O2, substantial amounts of O2 can be removed from Hb without greater drops in PaO2.[4] For example, Hb would be still 50% saturated although PaO2 has dropped to 26.6 mmHg (P50).
Figure 1

Oxy–hemoglobin dissociation curve

Oxy–hemoglobin dissociation curve From last 30 years, while working in critical care wards, I always used to wonder if any formula can be devised which, while waiting for ABG results, can rapidly help a clinician to reach to a PaO2 level just by looking at SpO2 values, and I have come up with certain observations/calculations. For the first 10% reduction in SpO2 from 100% to 90%, decrease PaO2 by 4 mmHg for every single percent reduction in SpO2 with a resultant PaO2 falling from 100 to 60 mmHg [Table 1]. For the next 10% reduction in SpO2 from 90% to 80%, decrease PaO2 by 1.5 mmHg for each percent reduction in SpO2 which will result in PaO2 falling from 60 to 45 mmHg. Finally, for SpO2 levels below 80%, divide it by 2, that is half the value of SpO2, and we get the requisite PaO2 level.
Table 1

Calculation for PaO2 assessment

Calculation for PaO2 assessment This hypothesis can have some pitfalls, for example, cyanide poisoning and certain hemoglobinopathies, but still, a fair and working assessment may be drawn from this calculation. Two proven measurements further support this hypothesis: As per classical teaching, at mixed venous point, the SpO2 of deoxygenated blood returning to the heart is taken as 75% with a saturation of 40 mmHg.[13] With the present calculation, O2 saturation would come out to be 75/2 = 37.5 mmHg, which, in clinical parlance, is not much further away from 40 mmHg The hypothesis is further supported by the value of P50, which is 26.6 mmHg, and again, which is almost half of 50%. This formula, which is not an exact mathematically proven entity, can be of extreme help to ICU residents and consultants. For example, if the monitor is showing a SpO2 of 70%, we can almost consider a value of PaO2 to be around 35 mmHg and take appropriate measures for the patient.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  1 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of hypoxemia.

Authors:  Malay Sarkar; N Niranjan; P K Banyal
Journal:  Lung India       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb
  1 in total
  10 in total

1.  Prediction of high-flow nasal cannula outcomes at the early phase using the modified respiratory rate oxygenation index.

Authors:  Zhe Li; Chen Chen; Zhangjun Tan; Yulong Yao; Shunpeng Xing; Yan Li; Yuan Gao; Zhanqi Zhao; Yuxiao Deng; Mingli Zhu
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 3.320

2.  Determining a target SpO2 to maintain PaO2 within a physiological range.

Authors:  Jantine G Röttgering; Angelique M E de Man; Thomas C Schuurs; Evert-Jan Wils; Johannes M Daniels; Joost G van den Aardweg; Armand R J Girbes; Yvo M Smulders
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Early hypoxemia burden is strongly associated with severe intracranial hemorrhage in preterm infants.

Authors:  Zachary A Vesoulis; Rachel L Bank; Doug Lake; Aaron Wallman-Stokes; Rakesh Sahni; J Randall Moorman; Joseph R Isler; Karen D Fairchild; Amit M Mathur
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 2.521

4.  Success or Failure of High-Flow Nasal Oxygen Therapy: The ROX Index Is Good, but a Modified ROX Index May Be Better.

Authors:  Habib M R Karim; Antonio M Esquinas
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 21.405

5.  Prone Positioning of Nonintubated Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mallikarjuna Ponnapa Reddy; Ashwin Subramaniam; Afsana Afroz; Baki Billah; Zheng Jie Lim; Alexandr Zubarev; Gabriel Blecher; Ravindranath Tiruvoipati; Kollengode Ramanathan; Suei Nee Wong; Daniel Brodie; Eddy Fan; Kiran Shekar
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 9.296

6.  Comparison of Pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment and Pediatric Risk of Mortality III Score as Mortality Prediction in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Sadam H Baloch; Ikramullah Shaikh; Murtaza A Gowa; Pooja D Lohano; Mohsina N Ibrahim
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-01-09

Review 7.  Chest imaging in pregnant patients with COVID-19: Recommendations, justification, and optimization.

Authors:  Anirudh Venugopalan Nair; Subramaniyan Ramanathan; Prasanna Venugopalan
Journal:  Acta Radiol Open       Date:  2022-03-07

8.  Modified cardiovascular SOFA score in sepsis: development and internal and external validation.

Authors:  Hui Jai Lee; Byuk Sung Ko; Seung Mok Ryoo; Eunah Han; Gil Joon Suh; Sung-Hyuk Choi; Sung Phil Chung; Tae Ho Lim; Won Young Kim; Woon Yong Kwon; Sung Yeon Hwang; You Hwan Jo; Jonghwan Shin; Tae Gun Shin; Kyuseok Kim
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 11.150

9.  Comparison of ROX index (SpO2/FIO2 ratio/respiratory rate) with a modified dynamic index incorporating PaO2/FIO2 ratio and heart rate to predict high flow nasal cannula outcomes among patients with acute respiratory failure: a single centre retrospective study.

Authors:  Amit Kansal; Wei Jun Dan Ong; Shekhar Dhanvijay; Arbe Tisha Pepito Siosana; Loraine Mae Padillo; Chee Keat Tan; Monika Gulati Kansal; Faheem Ahmed Khan
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 3.320

10.  Performance of prediction models for short-term outcome in COVID-19 patients in the emergency department: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Paul M E L van Dam; Noortje Zelis; Sander M J van Kuijk; Aimée E M J H Linkens; Renée A G Brüggemann; Bart Spaetgens; Iwan C C van der Horst; Patricia M Stassen
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 4.709

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.