Literature DB >> 28474263

Quality of Life Measurements: Any Value for Clinical Practice?

Matthias Büttner1, Veit Zebralla2, Andreas Dietz2, Susanne Singer3.   

Abstract

OPINION STATEMENT: Quality of life measurements are well established in cancer clinical trials. In daily clinical practice, where cancer patients often suffer from disease-specific symptoms and report unmet needs regarding their treatment, these measurements are not systematically implemented. The systematic (often computer-based) assessment of quality of life in daily cancer care has shown to be beneficial for patient-physician communication, symptom management, shared decision-making, and in creating a learning health system. Unfortunately, to date, routine electronic quality of life assessments are usually limited to large cancer facilities. Patient and physician barriers as well as barriers from the administrative side in particular are currently hindering the implementation of these systems into the broad spectrum of clinical cancer care. Cost-effectiveness analyses of existing systems, the inclusion of all relevant stakeholders, and clear implementation guidelines are required to introduce quality of life measurements in clinical cancer practice to improve the treatment of cancer survivors and to create a health care system that addresses all their disease-related needs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical practice; Implementation; Patient-reported outcomes; Quality of life

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28474263     DOI: 10.1007/s11864-017-0470-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol        ISSN: 1534-6277


  51 in total

Review 1.  Physical and psychological long-term and late effects of cancer.

Authors:  Kevin D Stein; Karen L Syrjala; Michael A Andrykowski
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient-physician communication: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Symone B Detmar; Martin J Muller; Jan H Schornagel; Lidwina D V Wever; Neil K Aaronson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-12-18       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Communicating patient-reported outcome scores using graphic formats: results from a mixed-methods evaluation.

Authors:  Michael D Brundage; Katherine C Smith; Emily A Little; Elissa T Bantug; Claire F Snyder
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 4.  The association between clinician-based common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) and patient-reported outcomes (PRO): a systematic review.

Authors:  Thomas M Atkinson; Sean J Ryan; Antonia V Bennett; Angela M Stover; Rebecca M Saracino; Lauren J Rogak; Sarah T Jewell; Konstantina Matsoukas; Yuelin Li; Ethan Basch
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Galina Velikova; Laura Booth; Adam B Smith; Paul M Brown; Pamela Lynch; Julia M Brown; Peter J Selby
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Electronic real-time assessment of patient-reported outcomes in routine care-first findings and experiences from the implementation in a comprehensive cancer center.

Authors:  Freya Trautmann; Leopold Hentschel; Beate Hornemann; Anke Rentsch; Michael Baumann; Gerhard Ehninger; Jochen Schmitt; Markus Schuler
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Computerized prospective screening for high levels of emotional distress in head and neck cancer patients and referral rate to psychosocial care.

Authors:  Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw; Remco de Bree; Alieke L Keizer; Ton Houffelaar; Pim Cuijpers; Mecheline H van der Linden; C René Leemans
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 5.337

8.  Patients' and health professionals' understanding of and preferences for graphical presentation styles for individual-level EORTC QLQ-C30 scores.

Authors:  W Kuijpers; J M Giesinger; A Zabernigg; T Young; E Friend; I M Tomaszewska; N K Aaronson; B Holzner
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  How successful are oncologists in identifying patient distress, perceived social support, and need for psychosocial counselling?

Authors:  W Söllner; A DeVries; E Steixner; P Lukas; G Sprinzl; G Rumpold; S Maislinger
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Integrating Patient-Reported Outcome Measures into Routine Cancer Care: Cancer Patients' and Clinicians' Perceptions of Acceptability and Value.

Authors:  Angela Stover; Debra E Irwin; Ronald C Chen; Bhishamjit S Chera; Deborah K Mayer; Hyman B Muss; Donald L Rosenstein; Thomas C Shea; William A Wood; Jessica C Lyons; Bryce B Reeve
Journal:  EGEMS (Wash DC)       Date:  2015-10-29
View more
  5 in total

1.  An implementation study of electronic assessment of patient-reported outcomes in inpatient radiation oncology.

Authors:  Thomas Nordhausen; Katharina Lampe; Dirk Vordermark; Bernhard Holzner; Haifa-Kathrin Al-Ali; Gabriele Meyer; Heike Schmidt
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2022-07-19

Review 2.  Monitoring and Evaluation of Late Functional Outcome in Post-treatment Follow-Up in Clinical Routine Setting.

Authors:  Veit Zebralla; Sylvia Meuret; Susanne Wiegand
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 6.244

3.  Depression, anxiety, fatigue, and quality of life in a large sample of patients suffering from head and neck cancer in comparison with the general population.

Authors:  S Wiegand; V Zebralla; C Hammermüller; A Hinz; A Dietz; G Wichmann; M Pirlich; T Berger; K Zimmermann; T Neumuth; A Mehnert-Theuerkauf
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  The Importance of Social Support, Optimism and Resilience on the Quality of Life of Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Iván Ruiz-Rodríguez; Isabel Hombrados-Mendieta; Anabel Melguizo-Garín; María José Martos-Méndez
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-03-09

5.  Web-Based Patient-Reported Outcomes for ENT Patients-Evaluation of the Status Quo, Patients' View, and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Theresa Wald; Veit Zebralla; Maren Boege; Viktor Kunz; Thomas Neumuth; Andreas Dietz; Gunnar Wichmann; Susanne Wiegand
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-18       Impact factor: 4.614

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.