Jonathan K Vincent1, Christopher Stark2, Joseph T Shields3, Anant D Bhave3, Christopher S Morris4,5. 1. Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Plymouth Hospital, Plymouth, USA. 2. Department of Radiology, Albany Medical Center, Albany, USA. 3. Department of Radiology, Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, Burlington, USA. 4. Department of Radiology, Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, Burlington, USA. christopher.morris@uvmhealth.org. 5. Patrick 1 Radiology, University of Vermont Medical Center, 111 Colchester Avenue, Burlington, VT, 05401, USA. christopher.morris@uvmhealth.org.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine if hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) correlates with advanced hepatic fibrosis, as a complement to transjugular (transvenous) core needle liver biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After institutional review board approval, a retrospective review was conducted on 340 patients who underwent transjugular (transvenous) core needle liver biopsy with concurrent pressure measurements between 6/1/2007 and 6/1/2013. Spearman correlation and linear regression were performed. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was created and sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and likelihood ratios were calculated. RESULTS: Indications included hepatitis C, abnormal liver function tests, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, autoimmune hepatitis, and cirrhosis, among others. Biopsies showed stage 1 or 2 fibrosis in 15.6% each, stage 3 fibrosis in 21.6%, stage 4 fibrosis in 40.7%, and no fibrosis in 6.5%. Mean HVPG was 6.5 mm Hg (SD 5.0) with a range of 0-26 mm Hg. Spearman correlation coefficient for association between HVPG and fibrosis stage was 0.561 (p < 0.001). R2 on linear regression was 0.247 (p < 0.001). ROC curve for the prediction of stage 4 fibrosis had an area under the curve of 0.79 (95% CI 0.73-0.85). HVPG of ≥6 mm Hg had a sensitivity of 71.3%, specificity of 79.6%, positive predictive value of 70.5%, negative predictive value of 80.2%, positive likelihood ratio of 3.49 (95% CI 2.45-4.97) and negative likelihood ratio of 0.36 (95% CI 0.26-0.50) for diagnosis of stage 4 fibrosis. CONCLUSIONS: HVPG correlates with stage 4 (advanced) hepatic fibrosis.
PURPOSE: To determine if hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) correlates with advanced hepatic fibrosis, as a complement to transjugular (transvenous) core needle liver biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After institutional review board approval, a retrospective review was conducted on 340 patients who underwent transjugular (transvenous) core needle liver biopsy with concurrent pressure measurements between 6/1/2007 and 6/1/2013. Spearman correlation and linear regression were performed. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was created and sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and likelihood ratios were calculated. RESULTS: Indications included hepatitis C, abnormal liver function tests, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, autoimmune hepatitis, and cirrhosis, among others. Biopsies showed stage 1 or 2 fibrosis in 15.6% each, stage 3 fibrosis in 21.6%, stage 4 fibrosis in 40.7%, and no fibrosis in 6.5%. Mean HVPG was 6.5 mm Hg (SD 5.0) with a range of 0-26 mm Hg. Spearman correlation coefficient for association between HVPG and fibrosis stage was 0.561 (p < 0.001). R2 on linear regression was 0.247 (p < 0.001). ROC curve for the prediction of stage 4 fibrosis had an area under the curve of 0.79 (95% CI 0.73-0.85). HVPG of ≥6 mm Hg had a sensitivity of 71.3%, specificity of 79.6%, positive predictive value of 70.5%, negative predictive value of 80.2%, positive likelihood ratio of 3.49 (95% CI 2.45-4.97) and negative likelihood ratio of 0.36 (95% CI 0.26-0.50) for diagnosis of stage 4 fibrosis. CONCLUSIONS: HVPG correlates with stage 4 (advanced) hepatic fibrosis.