| Literature DB >> 28473985 |
Shakil Mahmood1,2, Matiur Rahman1, Subrata Kumar Biswas1, Shaikh Nazmus Saqueeb1, Shiblee Zaman1, M Manirujjaman2, Rasheda Perveen2, Nurshad Ali3.
Abstract
Despite the abundant sunlight, vitamin D deficiency is prevalent in South Asian countries including Bangladesh. Information on vitamin D level is insufficient in adults particularly in female garment workers in Bangladesh. This study was designed to evaluate the status of vitamin D, parathormone (PTH), calcium, and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) among the female garment workers in Bangladesh. Blood samples were collected from female garment workers (n = 40, case group) and general female workers (n = 40, control group) in Dhaka. Serum vitamin D, PTH, calcium, and ALP were measured by chemiluminescence microparticle immunoassay. The mean level of vitamin D was significantly (p < 0.001) lower in case (14.2 ± 2.6 ng/mL) than in the control (22.4 ± 2.4 ng/mL) group. No significant difference was found at mean of PTH and calcium between case (33.9 ± 17.2 pg/mL; 9.1 ± 0.6 mg/dL, resp.) and control (35.9 ± 16.3 pg/mL; 9.3 ± 0.6 mg/dL, resp.) group. The mean ALP in case (117.2 ± 14.4 U/L) group was significantly (p < 0.001) higher than the control group (80.5 ± 30.6 U/L). Overall, PTH level did not show significant correlation with vitamin D. However, calcium and ALP levels showed a significant positive (p < 0.05) and negative (p < 0.001) correlation with vitamin D, respectively. This study indicates a high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in the female garment workers in Bangladesh.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28473985 PMCID: PMC5394353 DOI: 10.1155/2017/4105375
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Baseline demographic characteristics of study subjects.
| Characteristics | All | Case | Control |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | ( | ||
| Age (year) | 27.8 ± 5.1 | 27.2 ± 5.5 | 28.3 ± 4.6 | 0.32 |
| Weight (Kg) | 52.2 ± 5.2 | 50.9 ± 5.6 | 53.5 ± 4.4 | 0.03 |
| Height (cm) | 152.1 ± 5.1 | 151.3 ± 5.1 | 152.9 ± 4.9 | 0.78 |
| BMI (Kg/m2) | 22.6 ± 2.4 | 22.2 ± 2.5 | 22.9 ± 2.2 | 0.23 |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 72.1 ± 6.2 | 72.6 ± 6.6 | 71.6 ± 5.8 | 0.51 |
| Hip circumference (cm) | 81.3 ± 5.4 | 81.9 ± 5.9 | 80.8 ± 4.8 | 0.38 |
| Education level | ||||
| ≤primary | 30 | 20 | 10 | 0.68 |
| Primary-junior level | 30 | 10 | 20 | |
| ≤secondary | 20 | 10 | 10 |
Values are presented as mean ± SD. Independent sample t-test was done to find out the level of significance between the groups.
Serum concentration of vitamin D [25(OH)D], PTH, calcium, and ALP in the study subjects.
| Variables | Case ( | Control ( |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Median (range) | Mean ± SD | Median (range) | ||
| 25(OH)D (ng/mL) | 14.2 ± 2.6 | 14.3 (7.0–18.5) | 22.4 ± 2.4 | 22.1 (18.6–30.1) | <0.001 |
| PTH (pg/mL) | 33.9 ± 17.2 | 32.6 (7.9–90.0) | 35.9 ± 16.3 | 34.5 (12.0–80.0) | 0.609 |
| Calcium (mg/dL) | 9.1 ± 0.6 | 9.2 (7.5–10.0) | 9.3 ± 0.6 | 9.3 (7.5–10.5) | 0.057 |
| ALP (U/L) | 117.2 ± 14.4 | 123.0 (80.0–135.0) | 80.5 ± 30.6 | 79.0 (36.0–125.0) | <0.001 |
p values obtained by comparing the mean concentration of variables of case and control group. Independent sample t-test was used to evaluate the results.
Categorization of study subjects depending upon vitamin D [25(OH)D] status.
| Vitamin D | Case | Control |
|---|---|---|
|
|
| |
| Deficient (<20 ng/mL) | 40 (100) | 7 (17) |
| Insufficient (21–29 ng/mL) | 0 | 32 (80) |
| Sufficient (≥30 ng/mL) | 0 | 1 (3) |
Serum vitamin D [25(OH)D] concentration was categorized according to Institute of Medicine (IOM) 2011.
Figure 1Correlation of serum concentration of vitamin D [25(OH)D] with PTH (a), calcium (b), and ALP (c).
Intake of vitamin D containing selected food and vitamin D levels among the study subjects.
| Food items | Case | Control |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Mean ± SD |
| Mean ± SD | ||
| Egg consumption | |||||
| Not at all | 5 | 12.4 ± 2.2 | 2 | 21.4 ± 2.1 | 0.152 |
| 1–4 times/month | 15 | 13.5 ± 2.4 | 10 | 22.1 ± 1.9 | |
| 1–4 times/weekly | 10 | 14.9 ± 3.1 | 15 | 22.6 ± 2.3 | |
| 1-2 times/day | 10 | 15.4 ± 2.6 | 13 | 23.1 ± 3.4 | |
| Fish consumption | |||||
| Less than 3 times/month | 10 | 13.9 ± 2.2 | 3 | 21.8 ± 3.2 | 0.459 |
| 1–6 times/week | 20 | 14.3 ± 2.6 | 25 | 22.4 ± 2.2 | |
| 1-2 times/day | 10 | 14.5 ± 2.9 | 12 | 22.7 ± 2.2 | |
One-way ANOVA was used to find out the level of significance.