| Literature DB >> 28473745 |
Matthias Hirth1, Silvia Liverani2, Sebastian Mahlow1, François-Yves Bouget3, Georg Pohnert4,5, Severin Sasso1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The picoeukaryotic alga Ostreococcus tauri (Chlorophyta) belongs to the widespread group of marine prasinophytes. Despite its ecological importance, little is known about the metabolism of this alga.Entities:
Keywords: Carbon metabolism; Microalgae; Picoeukaryotes; Untargeted metabolomics; pantothenate.
Year: 2017 PMID: 28473745 PMCID: PMC5392535 DOI: 10.1007/s11306-017-1203-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Metabolomics ISSN: 1573-3882 Impact factor: 4.290
Fig. 1Quantification of cell density and bacterial content of O. tauri cultures by flow cytometry. a Example of a flow cytogram of an O. tauri culture (density plot). For illustration, a sample with a significant portion of bacteria (20%) is shown. b Cell densities obtained by flow cytometry compared to cell densities obtained by hemocytometer counting of different dilutions of 16-day old O. tauri cultures. In both cases, total cells were counted. For the flow-cytometric measurements, samples with the indicated cell densities were prepared with ASWO medium, and two technical replicates were counted. For hemocytometry, three independent biological samples with a cell density of ~7 × 106 cells ml−1 were counted (using five technical replicates per biological replicate), and the cell densities of the remaining samples were calculated. Mean ± standard deviation is shown
Fig. 2Experimental design for metabolic profiling of O. tauri under 12 h light:12 h dark conditions and collection of metadata. a Time points for the sampling of intracellular metabolites (arrows) and growth curve. To quantify algal cell density, samples were taken in the middle of the day (LD6). Note that data collected for an additional time point (42 h) were discarded due to normalization problems. b–f Other metadata collected over the course of the experiment including bacterial content of O. tauri cultures (b), pH (c), and the concentrations of nitrate (d), nitrite (e), and ammonium (f). The samples were taken in the middle of the day (LD6) except the time point marked by an arrow, which was taken in the middle of the night (LD18). Mean ± standard deviation of biological triplicates is shown (except for t = 1 day and 2 days in (a–c), and t = 0 in (d–f), where duplicates where measured)
Overview of intracellular metabolites identified in O. tauri and confirmed with the help of authentic standards
| Metabolite number | Metabolite | Class | Retention indexa |
| Match valueb |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | alanine | amino acid | 1102 | 116.2 | 836 |
| 6 | prolinec | amino acid | 1188 | 129.0 | 821 |
| 7 | 3-chloro-1,2-propanediol | glycerol derivative | 1192 | 116.0 | 728 |
| 11 | prolinec | amino acid | 1307 | 142.1 | 920 |
| 12 | glycine | amino acid | 1314 | 174.2 | 766 |
| 14 | glycerate | sugar acid | 1332 | 189.0 | 761 |
| 16 | pyrrole 2-carboxylate | heteroaromatic carboxylic acid | 1358 | 240.0 | 836 |
| 20 |
| amino acid | 1429 | 248.0 | 828 |
| 22 | pyroglutamated | amino acid | 1518 | 156.1 | 893 |
| 27 | threonate | sugar acid | 1547 | 292.2 | 924 |
| 31 | prolinec | amino acid | 1582 | 142.2 | 847 |
| 41 | methyl tetradecanoate | fatty acid ester | 1733 | 143.2 | 907 |
| 55 | phytole | diterpene alcohol | 1842 | 123.1 | 930 |
| 56 | phytole | diterpene alcohol | 1864 | 123.2 | 923 |
| 57 | phytole | diterpene alcohol | 1882 | 109.1 | 944 |
| 61 | methyl palmitate | fatty acid ester | 1929 | 143.1 | 920 |
| 64 | ethyl palmitate | fatty acid ester | 2008 | 101.1 | 760 |
| 71 | methyl stearidonate | fatty acid ester | 2115 | 105.0 | 924 |
| 72 | methyl linolenate | fatty acid ester | 2132 | 108.1 | 865 |
| 78 | phytole | diterpene alcohol | 2202 | 143.1 | 882 |
| 80 | linolenate (C18:3) | fatty acid | 2253 | 107.2 | 902 |
| 93 | methyl docosahexaenoate | fatty acid ester | 2494 | 105.0 | 909 |
| 96 | 1-palmitoylglycerol | fatty acid ester | 2603 | 371.3 | 805 |
| 98 | trehalose | disaccharide | 2736 | 361.1 | 909 |
| 99 | squalene | triterpene | 2816 | 121.2 | 898 |
Parent compounds of detected derivatives are listed. Metabolites were only considered if peaks were present in all samples, and if peak intensities were at least fivefold over background (see Sect. 2 for details). A full list of identified metabolites is given in Supplementary Table 1
aThe retention index was calculated from average retention times of the compound of interest and the two alkanes that elute before and after it
bMatch values are given for the comparison with an authentic standard analyzed on the same GC-MS instrument
cThe authentic standard proline yielded a set of peaks that included the peaks observed for metabolites #6, #11 and #31
dPyroglutamate is formed from glutamate during GC sample injection (Vidoudez and Pohnert 2012)
eThe authentic standard phytol yielded a set of peaks that included the peaks observed for metabolites #55, #56, #57 and #78
Fig. 3Time course of O. tauri metabolite concentrations over a light–dark cycle (heat map). For the metabolites of 111 quantifiable peaks, log2 values of mean abundances were calculated and centered on zero. Blue indicates increased metabolite abundance, red indicates decreased abundance. The underlying sampling scheme is depicted in Fig. 2a, and the absolute values used to prepare this figure are provided in Supplementary Table 3
Fig. 4Selected intracellular metabolites that show diurnal fluctuations in O. tauri. a Glycine (#12). b Squalene (#99). c Methyl docosahexaenoate (#93). d Trehalose (#98). For the metabolites, which were sampled according to the scheme shown in Fig. 2a, mean ± standard deviation of four biological replicates is shown. Since a standard curve was measured for trehalose (Supplementary Fig. 2), the trehalose concentration is expressed in pmol cell−1. For comparison, transcript levels (taken from Monnier et al. 2010) are depicted for selected genes related to the respective metabolites. The identifiers of all genes mentioned in this work are listed in Supplementary Table 4. The horizontal bars in the middle of the figure denote the light and dark phases (white and black areas, respectively)
Fig. 5Verification of trehalose in O. tauri. Shown are peaks from extracted ion chromatograms (EICs) representative of trehalose, maltose, or glucose. To unambiguously identify the disaccharide from O. tauri detected by GC-MS, an extract was treated with either trehalase or maltase. Only trehalase, but not maltase, efficiently hydrolyzed the disaccharide into glucose, showing that O. tauri produces trehalose. For comparison, standards of trehalose and maltose (enzyme-treated or untreated) and glucose are shown