| Literature DB >> 28473743 |
Frida Torell1,2, Kate Bennett3, Stefan Rännar3, Katrin Lundstedt-Enkel3,4, Torbjörn Lundstedt3,5, Johan Trygg1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Post-collection handling, storage and transportation can affect the quality of blood samples. Pre-analytical biases can easily be introduced and can jeopardize accurate profiling of the plasma metabolome. Consequently, a mouse study must be carefully planned in order to avoid any kind of bias that can be introduced, in order not to compromise the outcome of the study. The storage and shipment of the samples should be made in such a way that the freeze-thaw cycles are kept to a minimum. In order to keep the latent effects on the stability of the blood metabolome to a minimum it is essential to study the effect that the post-collection and pre-analytical error have on the metabolome.Entities:
Keywords: Freeze–thaw cycle; Metabolomics; Mouse; Multi-organ; OPLS-DA; Plasma
Year: 2017 PMID: 28473743 PMCID: PMC5392536 DOI: 10.1007/s11306-017-1196-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Metabolomics ISSN: 1573-3882 Impact factor: 4.290
Fig. 1PCA score plot with frozen and thawed samples from day 1 and day 3. The two components explained 25 and 15% of the variation, respectively. The first component explained approximately the thawed and frozen plasma samples. There was a tendency for the thawed samples to end up on the left-hand side in the score plot, while the frozen samples had a tendency to end up on the right-hand side. The blue and green spots represent the thawed samples (T) and the frozen samples (F), respectively. Samples from day 1 are represented by circles and samples from day 3 are represented by diamonds
OPLS-DA models for frozen versus thawed plasma samples
| Name | Type | A | N | R2X | R2Y | Q2Y | p valuea |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frozen versus thawed day 1 | OPLS-DA | 1 + 1 + 0 | 15 | 0.48 | 0.92 | 0.70 | 0.01 |
| Frozen versus thawed day 3 | OPLS-DA | 1 + 1 + 0 | 15 | 0.46 | 0.95 | 0.80 | 0.002 |
Eight samples from each time-point arrived frozen, while seven from each time-point arrived thawed
A number of components, N number of samples that the model is based on, R 2 “goodness of fit” parameter that shows how well the model describes the variation in the data. R2X, R2Y are the cumulative variations explained in the metabolite and class-variable data respectively, Q 2 Y “goodness of prediction” parameter and is the cross-validated prediction estimate of class separation that shows how well samples are predicted by the model
ap values were obtained using CV-ANOVA in SIMCA 14.0
Fig. 2Metabolite differences between frozen and thawed plasma samples. The metabolites in the left-hand column were found at higher levels in the frozen samples whereas the metabolites in the right-hand column (with a positive p(corr)-loading value) were higher in the thawed samples. Asterisks indicated the number of days that the difference between frozen and thawed were statistically significant (one asterisk represent that the difference was statistically significant one day, two asterisk showed that the difference between frozen and thawed samples was statistically significant on both days). Abbreviations used in the legend: A amine, AA amino acid, AK amino ketone, CHO carbohydrate, I inorganic acid, K ketone, L lipid constituent, P polyol, PU purine, PY pyrimidine and S sterol
Fig. 3SUS plots comparing plasma day 5 and organs (gut, kidney, liver, muscle and pancreas) and plasma day 1. The p(corr) for plasma was plotted against the p(corr) for each of the investigated organs (gut, kidney, liver and pancreas). This resulted in six separate SUS-plots where the metabolites responsible for the deviating metabolic pattern observed in the thawed plasma samples could be identified. The deviating metabolites have been named in each of the SUS-plots. Leu leucine, Phe phenylalanine, Thr threonine and Trp tryptophan