Literature DB >> 28473388

Draft Genome Sequence of Nitrobacter vulgaris Strain Ab1, a Nitrite-Oxidizing Bacterium.

Brett L Mellbye1, Edward W Davis2,3, Eva Spieck4, Jeff H Chang2,3, Peter J Bottomley5, Luis A Sayavedra-Soto1.   

Abstract

Here, we present the 3.9-Mb draft genome sequence of Nitrobacter vulgaris strain Ab1, which was isolated from a sewage system in Hamburg, Germany. The analysis of its genome sequence will contribute to our knowledge of nitrite-oxidizing bacteria and acyl-homoserine lactone quorum sensing in nitrifying bacteria.
Copyright © 2017 Mellbye et al.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28473388      PMCID: PMC5442373          DOI: 10.1128/genomeA.00290-17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Announc


GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Aerobic nitrification is generally a two-step process where ammonia is oxidized to nitrite, which is subsequently oxidized to nitrate (1). The second step is carried out by nitrite-oxidizing bacteria (NOB) (2, 3). NOB include both r-strategists, such as Nitrobacter spp., and K-strategists, such as Nitrospira spp., which coexist in a variety of environments (2–4). Nitrobacter spp. play a role in the response to large nitrogen fluctuations in soils and other systems (5–7). In addition, Nitrobacter spp. were the first NOB shown to produce and respond to acyl-homoserine lactone (AHL) quorum-sensing (QS) chemical signals (8, 9). Nitrobacter vulgaris strain Ab1 is a well-studied nitrifier, yet it has no available genome sequence (5, 10, 11). To address this need, we sequenced the genome of Nitrobacter vulgaris strain Ab1. Our primary goal was to identify loci corresponding to AHL autoinducer synthase and AHL-binding LuxR transcription factors. Genomic DNA was isolated using the Wizard genomic DNA purification kit (Promega). A Nextera XT DNA sample preparation kit was used to construct the sequencing library. The instructions were followed, up to those for normalization of libraries. A Qubit double-stranded DNA high-sensitivity assay kit (Life Technologies, Inc.) and Agilent TapeStation 4200 high-sensitivity D5000 DNA ScreenTape (Agilent Technologies) were used to determine the concentration and average sizes of the library fragments. The library was then quantified by quantitative PCR on an ABI 7500 Fast real-time system (Life Technologies, Inc.) using the Kapa library quantification kit (Kapa Biosystems). Sequencing was completed on a MiSeq (Illumina) 250-bp paired-end nano flow cell. There was a total of 2,436,208 reads, for an average coverage of 156×. Nextera XT adapter sequences were trimmed from the raw reads using the BBDuk software, as recommended in the manual (http://jgi.doe.gov/data-and-tools/bbtools/). Reads were error-corrected and assembled into contigs using SPAdes version 3.10.0, with the “--careful” flag and the k-mer setting of “-k 21,33,55,77,99” (12), and screened for contaminating sequences with the blobtools software (version 0.9.19.5) (13, 14). De novo assembly of the MiSeq reads resulted in 95 contigs that totaled 3,900,573 nucleotides in length, with a mean contig size of 41,059 nucleotides; the N50 contig length was 130,999 nucleotides. Genome annotation was completed using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline, resulting in 3,501 coding genes and 56 RNA-coding genes (15). The N. vulgaris genome sequence is 59.8% G+C and has pairwise average nucleotide identities (16) of 83.0% and 81.2% to Nitrobacter winogradskyi and Nitrobacter hamburgensis, respectively (17, 18). These low values suggest that N. vulgaris is too distant from comparators to be considered a member of their species. The N. vulgaris genome has all the genes necessary for chemolithotrophic growth on nitrite. Interestingly, genes encoding a putative AHL autoinducer synthase and AHL-binding LuxR homolog were present, as well as putative nitric-oxide-forming nirK (aniA) and nnrS genes, possibly suggesting similar QS regulation of NO fluxes to N. winogradskyi (9).

Accession number(s).

The genome of N. vulgaris strain AB1 was deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession number MWPQ00000000. The version described in this paper is the first version.
  12 in total

1.  Influence of physicochemical and operational parameters on Nitrobacter and Nitrospira communities in an aerobic activated sludge bioreactor.

Authors:  Zhonghua Huang; Phillip B Gedalanga; Pitiporn Asvapathanagul; Betty H Olson
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 11.236

2.  The phylogeny of the genus Nitrobacter based on comparative rep-PCR, 16S rRNA and nitrite oxidoreductase gene sequence analysis.

Authors:  Bram Vanparys; Eva Spieck; Kim Heylen; Lieven Wittebolle; Joke Geets; Nico Boon; Paul De Vos
Journal:  Syst Appl Microbiol       Date:  2007-01-08       Impact factor: 4.022

3.  Comparison of oxidation kinetics of nitrite-oxidizing bacteria: nitrite availability as a key factor in niche differentiation.

Authors:  Boris Nowka; Holger Daims; Eva Spieck
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Nitrite-Oxidizing Bacterium Nitrobacter winogradskyi Produces N-Acyl-Homoserine Lactone Autoinducers.

Authors:  Brett L Mellbye; Peter J Bottomley; Luis A Sayavedra-Soto
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Genome sequence of the chemolithoautotrophic nitrite-oxidizing bacterium Nitrobacter winogradskyi Nb-255.

Authors:  Shawn R Starkenburg; Patrick S G Chain; Luis A Sayavedra-Soto; Loren Hauser; Miriam L Land; Frank W Larimer; Stephanie A Malfatti; Martin G Klotz; Peter J Bottomley; Daniel J Arp; William J Hickey
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Shifts between Nitrospira- and Nitrobacter-like nitrite oxidizers underlie the response of soil potential nitrite oxidation to changes in tillage practices.

Authors:  E Attard; F Poly; C Commeaux; F Laurent; A Terada; B F Smets; S Recous; X Le Roux
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-10-05       Impact factor: 5.491

7.  Complete genome sequence of Nitrobacter hamburgensis X14 and comparative genomic analysis of species within the genus Nitrobacter.

Authors:  Shawn R Starkenburg; Frank W Larimer; Lisa Y Stein; Martin G Klotz; Patrick S G Chain; Luis A Sayavedra-Soto; Amisha T Poret-Peterson; Mira E Gentry; Daniel J Arp; Bess Ward; Peter J Bottomley
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Quorum Quenching of Nitrobacter winogradskyi Suggests that Quorum Sensing Regulates Fluxes of Nitrogen Oxide(s) during Nitrification.

Authors:  Brett L Mellbye; Andrew T Giguere; Peter J Bottomley; Luis A Sayavedra-Soto
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 7.867

9.  Blobology: exploring raw genome data for contaminants, symbionts and parasites using taxon-annotated GC-coverage plots.

Authors:  Sujai Kumar; Martin Jones; Georgios Koutsovoulos; Michael Clarke; Mark Blaxter
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 4.599

10.  Gall-ID: tools for genotyping gall-causing phytopathogenic bacteria.

Authors:  Edward W Davis Ii; Alexandra J Weisberg; Javier F Tabima; Niklaus J Grunwald; Jeff H Chang
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 2.984

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Achieving Partial Nitritation by Treating Sludge With Free Nitrous Acid: The Potential Role of Quorum Sensing.

Authors:  Cancan Jiang; Xu Wang; Huacai Wang; Shengjun Xu; Wei Zhang; Qingjie Meng; Xuliang Zhuang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 6.064

2.  Differential Responses of the Catalytic Efficiency of Ammonia and Nitrite Oxidation to Changes in Temperature.

Authors:  Anne E Taylor; Brett L Mellbye
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 6.064

3.  Acyl-Homoserine Lactone Production in Nitrifying Bacteria of the Genera Nitrosospira, Nitrobacter, and Nitrospira Identified via a Survey of Putative Quorum-Sensing Genes.

Authors:  Brett L Mellbye; Eva Spieck; Peter J Bottomley; Luis A Sayavedra-Soto
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 4.792

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.