Literature DB >> 28473091

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Cerebrovascular Disease.

Michael B Salmela1, Shabnam Mortazavi1, Bharathi D Jagadeesan2, Daniel F Broderick3, Judah Burns4, Tejaswini K Deshmukh5, H Benjamin Harvey6, Jenny Hoang7, Christopher H Hunt8, Tabassum A Kennedy9, Alexander A Khalessi10, William Mack11, Nandini D Patel12, Joel S Perlmutter13, Bruno Policeni14, Jason W Schroeder15, Gavin Setzen16, Matthew T Whitehead17, Rebecca S Cornelius18, Amanda S Corey19.   

Abstract

Diseases of the cerebral vasculature represent a heterogeneous group of ischemic and hemorrhagic etiologies, which often manifest clinically as an acute neurologic deficit also known as stroke or less commonly with symptoms such as headache or seizures. Stroke is the fourth leading cause of death and is a leading cause of serious long-term disability in the United States. Eighty-seven percent of strokes are ischemic, 10% are due to intracerebral hemorrhage, and 3% are secondary to subarachnoid hemorrhage. The past two decades have seen significant developments in the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of ischemic and hemorrhagic causes of stroke with advancements in CT and MRI technology and novel treatment devices and techniques. Multiple different imaging modalities can be used in the evaluation of cerebrovascular disease. The different imaging modalities all have their own niches and their own advantages and disadvantages in the evaluation of cerebrovascular disease. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Copyright © 2017 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AUC; Appropriate Use Criteria; Appropriateness Criteria; arteriovenous malformation; cerebral aneurysm; cerebrovascular disease; stroke; transient ischemic attack; vasculitis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28473091     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.01.051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  9 in total

1.  CT Scanning in Suspected Stroke or Head Trauma: Is it Worth Going the Extra Mile and Including the Chest to Screen for COVID-19 Infection?

Authors:  R M Kwee; J Krdzalic; B A C M Fasen; T M H de Jaegere
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  The role of imaging in the management of non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage: a practical review.

Authors:  Garvit D Khatri; Basar Sarikaya; Nathan M Cross; Jonathan R Medverd
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2021-02-13

3.  Intermittent hypoxia promotes the recovery of motor function in rats with cerebral ischemia by regulating mitochondrial function.

Authors:  Yue Su; Changkai Ke; Chen Li; Chuan Huang; Chunxiao Wan
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2022-06-06

4.  Artificial Intelligence with Statistical Confidence Scores for Detection of Acute or Subacute Hemorrhage on Noncontrast CT Head Scans.

Authors:  Eli Gibson; Bogdan Georgescu; Pascal Ceccaldi; Pierre-Hugo Trigan; Youngjin Yoo; Jyotipriya Das; Thomas J Re; Vishwanath Rs; Abishek Balachandran; Eva Eibenberger; Andrei Chekkoury; Barbara Brehm; Uttam K Bodanapally; Savvas Nicolaou; Pina C Sanelli; Thomas J Schroeppel; Thomas Flohr; Dorin Comaniciu; Yvonne W Lui
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2022-04-20

5.  Generally applicable window settings of low-keV virtual monoenergetic reconstructions in dual-layer CT-angiography of the head and neck.

Authors:  David Zopfs; Simon Lennartz; Nuran Abdullayev; Thorsten Lichtenstein; Kai Roman Laukamp; Robert Peter Reimer; Christoph Kabbasch; Jan Borggrefe; Marc Schlamann; Victor Neuhaus; Nils Große Hokamp
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-08

Review 6.  Diagnostic value of alternative techniques to gadolinium-based contrast agents in MR neuroimaging-a comprehensive overview.

Authors:  Anna Falk Delgado; Danielle Van Westen; Markus Nilsson; Linda Knutsson; Pia C Sundgren; Elna-Marie Larsson; Alberto Falk Delgado
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2019-08-23

Review 7.  Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome: review of neuroimaging findings.

Authors:  Teresa Perillo; Chiara Paolella; Giulia Perrotta; Antonietta Serino; Ferdinando Caranci; Andrea Manto
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2022-08-06       Impact factor: 6.313

Review 8.  Automated Identification of Multiple Findings on Brain MRI for Improving Scan Acquisition and Interpretation Workflows: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Kaining Sheng; Cecilie Mørck Offersen; Jon Middleton; Jonathan Frederik Carlsen; Thomas Clement Truelsen; Akshay Pai; Jacob Johansen; Michael Bachmann Nielsen
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-03

Review 9.  Neuroimaging of Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

Authors:  Peter B Sporns; Marios-Nikos Psychogios; Grégoire Boulouis; Andreas Charidimou; Qi Li; Enrico Fainardi; Dar Dowlatshahi; Joshua N Goldstein; Andrea Morotti
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 4.241

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.