Literature DB >> 28473070

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Evaluation of Nipple Discharge.

Su-Ju Lee1, Sunita Trikha2, Linda Moy3, Paul Baron4, Roberta M diFlorio5, Edward D Green6, Samantha L Heller7, Anna I Holbrook8, Alana A Lewin7, Ana P Lourenco9, Bethany L Niell10, Priscilla J Slanetz11, Ashley R Stuckey12, Nina S Vincoff13, Susan P Weinstein14, Monica M Yepes15, Mary S Newell16.   

Abstract

Appropriate imaging evaluation of nipple discharge depends the nature of the discharge. Imaging is not indicated for women with physiologic nipple discharge. For evaluation of pathologic nipple discharge, multiple breast imaging modalities are rated for evidence-based appropriateness under various scenarios. For women age 40 or older, mammography or digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) should be the initial examination. Ultrasound is usually added as a complementary examination, with some exceptions. For women age 30 to 39, either mammogram or ultrasound may be used as the initial examination on the basis of institutional preference. For women age 30 or younger, ultrasound should be the initial examination, with mammography/DBT added when ultrasound shows suspicious findings or if the patient is predisposed to developing breast cancer. For men age 25 or older, mammography/DBT should be performed initially, with ultrasound added as indicated, given the high incidence of breast cancer in men with pathologic nipple discharge. Although MRI and ductography are not usually appropriate as initial examinations, each may be useful when the initial standard imaging evaluation is negative. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Copyright © 2017 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AUC; Appropriate Use Criteria; Appropriateness Criteria; breast MRI; breast ultrasound; digital breast tomosynthesis; ductography; mammography; nipple discharge

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28473070     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.01.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  12 in total

Review 1.  Benign Breast Disease in Women.

Authors:  Angrit Stachs; Johannes Stubert; Toralf Reimer; Steffi Hartmann
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Stereotaxic Core-Needle Biopsy in Assessing Intraductal Pathologic Findings at Ductography.

Authors:  G A Belonenko; N A Sukhina; A A Aksyonov; E G Aksyonova
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2022-07-01

Review 3.  Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of pathologic nipple discharge: indications and imaging findings.

Authors:  Naziya Samreen; Laura B Madsen; Celin Chacko; Samantha L Heller
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Spectrum of imaging findings of papillary breast disease: A radiopathological review in a tertiary center.

Authors:  Farhana Fadzli; Kartini Rahmat; Marlina Tanty Ramli; Faizatul Izza Rozalli; Teoh Kean Hooi; Ahmad Nazran Fadzli; See Mee Hoong; Norlisah Mohd Ramli; Nur Aishah Mohd Taib
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  Feasibility of Narrow-Band Imaging, Intraductal Biopsy, and Laser Ablation During Mammary Ductoscopy: Protocol for an Interventional Study.

Authors:  S Makineli; M D Filipe; F Euwe; A Sakes; J Dankelman; P Breedveld; M R Vriens; P J van Diest; A J Witkamp
Journal:  Int J Surg Protoc       Date:  2022-09-01

6.  The Value of Adding Ductography to Ultrasonography for the Evaluation of Pathologic Nipple Discharge in Women with Negative Mammography.

Authors:  Younjung Choi; Sun Mi Kim; Mijung Jang; Bo La Yun; Eunyoung Kang; Eun-Kyu Kim; So Yeon Park; Bohyoung Kim; Nariya Cho; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 7.109

7.  DBT-galactography: a promising tool for improving the diagnostic workup of nipple discharge.

Authors:  Marco Moschetta; Vincenzo De Ruvo; Angelica Drago; Nicoletta Troiano; Simona Paolicelli; Giuseppe Rubini; Amato Antonio Stabile Ianora; Michele Telegrafo
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2020-08-04

Review 8.  Nipple discharge: The state of the art.

Authors:  Giovanna Panzironi; Federica Pediconi; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  BJR Open       Date:  2018-11-07

Review 9.  Meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness of ductoscopy, duct excision surgery and MRI for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with pathological nipple discharge.

Authors:  M D Filipe; S I S Patuleia; M R Vriens; P J van Diest; A J Witkamp
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Invasive lobular carcinoma mammographic findings: correlation with age, breast composition, and tumour size.

Authors:  Corrado Tagliati; Federico Cerimele; Antonietta Di Martino; Fabrizio Capone; Marialuisa Di Matteo; Nevia Caputo; Gabriella Lucidi Pressanti; Ying Mingliang; Silvia Baldassarre; Andrea Giovagnoni; Gian Marco Giuseppetti
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2021-06-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.