Literature DB >> 28472343

Maturation in Serum Thyroid Function Parameters Over Childhood and Puberty: Results of a Longitudinal Study.

Peter N Taylor1,2, Adrian Sayers2,3, Onyebuchi Okosieme1,4, Gautam Das4, Mohd S Draman1, Arshiya Tabasum5, Hussam Abusahmin5, Mohammad Rahman5, Kirsty Stevenson6, Alix Groom2,7, Kate Northstone2, Wolf Woltersdorf6,8, Andrew Taylor9, Susan Ring2,7, John H Lazarus1, John W Gregory1, Aled Rees5,10, Nicholas Timpson7, Colin M Dayan1.   

Abstract

Context: Serum thyroid hormone levels differ between children and adults, but have not been studied longitudinally through childhood. Objective: To assess changes in thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) and thyroid hormone levels over childhood and their interrelationships. Design: Cohort study. Setting: The Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children, a population-based birth cohort. Participants: A total of 4442 children who had thyroid function measured at age 7, and 1263 children who had thyroid function measured at age 15. Eight hundred eighty-four children had measurements at both ages. Main Outcome Measures: Reference ranges for TSH, free tri-iodothyronine (FT3), free thyroxine (FT4), their longitudinal stability, and interrelationships.
Results: Children at age 7 years had a higher FT3 [6.17 pmol/L, standard deviation (SD) 0.62] than children at age 15 (5.83 pmol/L, SD 0.74); P < 0.0001 with 23.2% of children at age 7 having FT3 above the adult reference range. Higher FT3 levels at age 7 in boys (P = 0.0001) and girls (P = 0.04) were associated with attainment of a more advanced pubertal stage at age 13. TSH was positively associated with FT3 at age 7 and age 15 even after adjusting for confounders. In contrast, TSH was negatively associated with FT4. Conclusions: There are substantial changes in TSH and thyroid hormone levels over childhood, in particular for FT3, which appear to relate to pubertal readiness. Our data provide increased insight into the evolution of the pituitary-thyroid axis over childhood and may have implications for determining optimal ranges for thyroid hormone replacement in children.
Copyright © 2017 Endocrine Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28472343      PMCID: PMC5505201          DOI: 10.1210/jc.2016-3605

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


Thyroid hormones play an important role in developmental processes, including growth, maintenance of metabolic balance, and cell development (1). Even minor variation in thyroid hormone status within the normal population reference range is associated with important phenotypic consequences (2). The complex inverse relationship between thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) and free thyroxine (FT4) renders TSH the more sensitive marker of overall thyroid status (3). Free tri-iodothyronine (FT3) is the active thyroid hormone, although serum levels only indirectly reflect overall thyroid status because a substantial proportion of intracellular FT3 is produced from conversion of intracellular FT4 by deiodinases (4, 5). However, there is some evidence that T3 may have a more important role than previously assumed in both the assessment and therapy of thyroid disease in younger children (6). Thyroid hormone levels are largely genetically determined (7), with similar effects from genetic variation observed in children and adults (8). Although it is well established in adults that there is narrow intraindividual variation in thyroid hormone parameters compared with interindividual variation (9), increased variance and ranges in thyroid hormone levels have been observed throughout childhood, and adult reference intervals may not be universally applicable to children (10–12). Previous cross-sectional studies have indicated that FT3 substantially falls and FT4 rises from age 4 (13–15), but there have been no longitudinal studies to confirm these observations. Furthermore, from genetic analyses we have recently identified that higher body mass index and adiposity appear to causally increase FT3, but not TSH or FT4 levels (16); therefore, the longitudinal stability of thyroid hormones over childhood, and FT3 in particular, remains unclear. In this report, we studied TSH and thyroid hormone levels at ages 7 and 15 in a large population birth cohort. We assessed age and sex reference ranges in 4442 healthy children at age 7 and 1253 children at age 15 (884 children had thyroid function measured at both time points). We also explored the longitudinal variability of TSH and thyroid hormone levels using linear mixed models by sex, pubertal status, and body mass index (BMI) and also assessed the relationship between TSH and thyroid hormone at different time points over childhood.

Methods

Participants

Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) is a prospective birth cohort that enrolled >13,000 pregnant women in the former County of Avon, UK, with an expected delivery date between April 1991 and December 1992 (17, 18) (see www.alspac.bris.ac.uk). Children were regularly brought back to focus clinics where data were collected and phenotypic measurements and blood samples were taken. The study website contains details of all the data that are available through a fully searchable database: www.bris.ac.uk/alspac/researchers/data-access/data-dictionary/. Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the ALSPAC Ethics and Law Committee and the Local Research Ethics Committees. There were no children on levothyroxine or antithyroid medications in the study dataset.

Laboratory measures

TSH, FT3, and FT4 were measured during 2010–2011 on remaining frozen stored serum samples taken from the focus at age 7 years (median age 89 months) and focus at age 15 clinics (median age 184 months). Samples were analyzed using chemiluminescent emission utilizing a photomultiplier on cobas e601 (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). A total of 4442 samples was available for full thyroid function testing at age 7 years, and 1253 were available at age 15 years. A total of 884 children samples was available and processed at both ages 7 and 15. Reference ranges for adults are TSH, 0.27 to 4.2 mU/L; FT3, 3.9 to 6.7 pmol/L; and FT4, 12 to 22 pmol/L. It has been previously demonstrated that TSH and FT4 can be analyzed reliably in samples stored for up to 23 years (19). The intra-assay precision coefficients of variance for TSH, FT3, and FT4 were <3.1%, <4%, and <4%, respectively. The interassay precision coefficients of variance were <7.3%, <6%, and <7%, respectively.

Phenotypic measures

Standing height was measured using a wall-mounted Harpenden stadiometer (Holtain, Crymych, UK). BMI was calculated as weight (in kilograms) divided by height (in meters) squared. Pubertal status was self-assessed using a Tanner stage questionnaire at age 13.5 years (pubic hair domain), range 13.1 to 14.4 years.

Statistical analysis

Implausible TSH and thyroid hormone levels [>4 standard deviation (SD) from the mean for the sex- and age-specific category] were considered as outliers and were recoded to missing. TSH was loge transformed to an approximately normal distribution. Descriptive statistics are presented as geometric means, SD, median, and 95th centiles. A linear mixed model with random intercepts and random slopes was used to assess the trends of TSH and thyroid hormone parameters over childhood (20). An unstructured variance–covariance matrix was assumed. We analyzed the baseline values at age 7, the variability at baseline, the longitudinal trend (slope) between ages 7 and 15, and the variability in the slope. Analyses were performed with gender interactions and gender X puberty interactions. Model simplification was undertaken using likelihood ratio tests. Additional analysis was undertaken adjusting for BMI, as this may be associated with pubertal development and FT3 in particular or on the causal pathway between thyroid status and pubertal development. We then explored the relationship between TSH and thyroid hormone levels at ages 7 and 15. Here thyroid function was standardized, and therefore results are presented as per SD change in the outcome. Analyses were initially performed adjusted for age at thyroid measurements and gender (model 1). Three further models controlling for key potential confounders were undertaken; model 2 also adjusted for thyroid hormone parameters, model 3 also adjusted for measures of social class and early life environment including parents’ home ownership, maternal age at birth of child, maternal highest educational qualification, maternal smoking in pregnancy, family adversity index, and parents and home score. Likelihood ratio tests were used to identify whether there was any evidence of interaction by sex on the relationship between thyroid hormone parameters and TSH.

Results

Study population and baseline characteristics

The derivation of study participant numbers is shown in Fig. 1. A total of 80 children at age 7 (1.8%) and 38 children at age 15 (2.9%) met the outlier exclusion. Children in our final analysis dataset were more likely to have several higher markers of affluence and fewer early life events than the remainder of the ALSPAC cohort (Supplemental Table 1).
Figure 1.

Study participants.

Study participants.

Serum thyroid hormone levels in children at ages 7 and 15

At age 7 years, the mean and 95% reference range values for TSH, FT3, and FT4 were 2.26 (0.93 to 4.48) mU/L, 6.29 (5.13 to 7.59) pmol/L, and 15.7 (12.7 to 19.3) pmol/L, respectively (Table 1). A total of 23.2% of children at age 7 years had a FT3 above the adult reference range, with only 3.65% of children having a TSH and 0.2% of children having FT4 values above the adult reference range (Fig. 2; Table 1). At age 15 years, the mean and 95% reference range values for TSH, FT3, and FT4 were 2.43 (0.91 to 5.05) mU/L, 5.83 (4.45 to 7.35) pmol/L, and 15.5 (11.9 to 20.3) pmol/L, respectively (Fig. 3; Table 1), with a marked reduction in children having FT3 above the adult reference range to 12.2%, which was mainly in girls (Table 1). Analysis of just the 884 children who had thyroid function at both ages 7 and 15 revealed similar results (Supplemental Table 2). There was a modest correlation between TSH levels between ages 7 and 15 (Pearson’s correlation coefficient = 0.35), which was similar for FT4 (Pearson’s correlation coefficient = 0.33), although a much weaker correlation was observed for FT3 (Pearson’s correlation coefficient = 0.10). Bland–Altman plots revealed no evidence of heteroskedasticity for TSH, FT3, and FT4 (Supplemental Fig. 1).
Table 1.

Reference Range for Thyroid Hormone Parameters Age 7 and Age 15

AllMalesFemales
Age (Y)NMean(2.5%–97.5%)% Above ARR% Below ARRNMean(2.5%–97.5%)% Above ARR% Below ARRNMean(2.5%–97.5%)% Above ARR% Below ARR
TSH (mU/L)44422.260.93–4.483.65023232.320.97–4.503.57021192.200.88–4.453.730
FT3 (pmol/L)744426.295.13–7.5923.20.0923236.235.07–7.5619.80.1721196.355.16–7.5926.90
FT4 (pmol/L)442215.712.7–19.30.200.70232315.612.7–19.00.170.73211915.912.85–19.550.240.66
TSH (mU/L)12632.430.91–5.056.3306442.510.91–5.177.9206192.340.87–5.004.680
FT3 (pmol/L)1512635.834.45–7.3512.20.556446.164.84–7.620.706195.484.23–6.913.391.13
FT4 (pmol/L)126315.511.9–20.30.792.6964415.511.8–20.20.622.9561915.512.0–20.60.972.42

Abbreviation: ARR, adult reference range.

Figure 2.

(a) Histogram of TSH levels at age 7 (vertical lines refer to adult reference range). (b) Histogram of FT3 levels at age 7 (vertical lines refer to adult reference range). (c) Histogram of FT4 levels at age 7 (vertical lines refer to adult reference range).

Figure 3.

(a) Histogram of TSH levels at age 15 (vertical lines refer to adult reference range). (b) Histogram of FT3 levels at age 15 (vertical lines refer to adult reference range). (c) Histogram of FT4 levels at age 15 (vertical lines refer to adult reference range).

Reference Range for Thyroid Hormone Parameters Age 7 and Age 15 Abbreviation: ARR, adult reference range. (a) Histogram of TSH levels at age 7 (vertical lines refer to adult reference range). (b) Histogram of FT3 levels at age 7 (vertical lines refer to adult reference range). (c) Histogram of FT4 levels at age 7 (vertical lines refer to adult reference range). (a) Histogram of TSH levels at age 15 (vertical lines refer to adult reference range). (b) Histogram of FT3 levels at age 15 (vertical lines refer to adult reference range). (c) Histogram of FT4 levels at age 15 (vertical lines refer to adult reference range).

Linear mixed models analysis in children with thyroid function at age 7 and age 15

TSH levels rose between ages 7 and 15 years, whereas both FT3 and FT4 levels fell. Strong negative correlations were observed in the models for TSH FT3 and FT4, indicating that those with higher levels at age 7 years were more likely to have more substantial lowering of levels at age 15, and those with lower levels at age 7 were likely to have smaller reductions at age 15, i.e., a convergence of biomarkers (Table 2). Every 2 years between ages 7 and 15 years, TSH levels increased by 0.03 mU/L [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.02, 0.05], P < 0.001. Boys had a higher baseline TSH than girls at age 7 years by 0.11 mU/L (95% CI 0.06, 0.17), P < 0.001. There was no difference in mean gain between boys and girls between ages 7 and 15 years, B = 0.0001 (95% CI −0.001, 0.001), P = 0.83, and no difference in variability at baseline −0.04 (95% CI −0.10, 0.03), P = 0.29, or in the variability of the slope B = 5.73 × 10−06 (95% CI −0.0002 and 0.0003), P = 0.65 (Table 2).
Table 2.

Overall Linear Mixed Models for TSH FT

ParameterGroupMeasureFactorCoefficient95% CIP Value
TSH (mU/L)AllMain effectsAge 7 years2.27(2.24, 2.3)<0.001
Slope0.0013(0.0007, 0.002)<0.001
VariabilitySD@ Age 7 years1.62(1.56, 1.67)
SD Slope0.14(0.13, 0.14)
Correlation (int, slope)−0.87(−0.89, −0.86)
FT3 (pmol/L)AllMain effectsAge 7 years6.29(6.27, 6.31)<0.001
Slope−0.005(−0.005, −0.004)<0.001
VariabilitySD@ Age 7 years1.28(1.24, 1.32)
SDSlope0.12(0.11, 0.12)
Correlation(int, slope)−0.92(−0.93, −0.91)
FT4 (pmol/L)AllMain effectsAge 7 years15.7(15.7, 15.8)<0.001
Slope−0.002(−0.03, −0.0005)0.005
VariabilitySD@ Age 73.03(2.92, 3.14)
SDSlope0.27(0.26, 0.28)
Correlation (int, slope)−0.86(−0.88, −0.84)
TSHBoysMain effectsAge 72.322.28, 2.36<0.001
Slope0.0010.0005, 0.0020.002
VariabilitySD@ Age 70.90.87, 0.92
SDSlope0.010.01, 0.01
Correlation (int, slope)−0.46−0.52, −0.39
FT3BoysMain effectsAge 76.236.2, 6.25<0.001
Slope−0.0005−0.001, 0.0000090.09
VariabilitySD@ Age 70.630.61, 0.64
SDSlope0.0090.008, 0.009
Correlation (int, slope)−0.58−0.63, −0.53
FT4BoysMain effectsAge 715.515.4, 15.6<0.001
Slope0.0003−0.001, 0.0020.72
VariabilitySD@ Age 71.631.58, 1.68
SDSlope0.0220.021, 0.023
Correlation (int, slope)−0.41−0.48, −0.34
TSHGirlsMain effectsAge 72.212.17, 2.24
Slope0.0010.0004, 0.002<0.001
VariabilitySD@ Age 70.920.89, 0.95
SDSlope0.010.01, 0.01
Correlation (int, slope)−0.52−0.58, −0.46
FT3GirlsMain effectsAge 76.366.33, 6.38<0.001
Slope−0.009−0.01, −0.08<0.001
VariabilitySD@ Age 70.610.59, 0.63
SDSlope0.0090.008, 0.009
Correlation (int, slope)−0.61−0.66, −0.56
FT4GirlsMain effectsAge 715.915.8, 16<0.001
Slope−0.004−0.006, −0.002<0.001
VariabilitySD@ Age 71.741.69, 1.8
SDSlope0.0220.21, 0.22
Correlation (int, slope)−0.42−0.49, −0.35
Overall Linear Mixed Models for TSH FT For FT3, every 2 years between the ages of 7 and 15 years, FT3 levels fell 0.12 pmol/L (95% CI −0.13, −0.10). Girls had a higher baseline FT3 level than boys by 0.13 pmol/L (95% CI 0.09, 0.17), P < 0.001. However, boys had a reduced decline in FT3 than girls, B = 0.008 (95% CI 0.007, 0.009), P < 0.001. There was no substantial difference by sex in variability at baseline B = 0.02 (95% CI −0.01, 0.05), P = 0.29, or in variability in slope B = 7.85 × 10−06 (95% CI −5.18 × 10−06, 2.01 × 10−05), P = 0.24 (Table 2). Every 2 years, FT4 levels fell 0.04 pmol/L (95% CI −0.07, −0.01), P = 0.005. Girls had a higher baseline FT4 level than boys by 0.38 pmol/L (95% CI 0.28, 0.48), P < 0.001, and also had more variability at baseline at age 7 years, B = 0.38 (95% CI 0.14, 0.62), P = 0.002, although there was no difference in variability in slope B = 4.47 × 10−05 (95% CI 4.47 × 10−05, 0.001), P = 0.33 (Table 2). Adjusting the analysis for BMI revealed similar results, although it markedly attenuated the slope for TSH (Supplemental Table 3).

Relationship between pubertal status at age 13 and TSH and thyroid hormone parameters at ages 7 and 15

A total of 2702 children also had pubertal status self-assessed at age 13 years as well as having thyroid function measured. As expected, girls had a higher Tanner score than boys 3.63 (95% CI 3.58, 3.69) vs 2.96 (95% CI 2.89, 3.02), P < 0.0001. Pubertal status at age 13 years was not associated with TSH levels at age 7 in boys (P = 0.89) or girls (P = 0.31). No difference in TSH slope by pubertal status was observed in boys (P = 0.82) or girls (P = 0.82). Pubertal status at age 13 years was also not associated with FT4 levels at age 7 years in boys (P = 0.32) or girls (P = 0.52). By contrast, FT3 levels at age 7 years were higher in both boys (P = 0.0001) and girls (P = 0.04) with more advanced puberty at age 13 years (Table 3). More advanced pubertal status at age 13 years was, however, associated with a negative FT3 slope unlike children at an earlier pubertal status at age 13, which had a positive FT3 slope, in both boys and girls (P ≤ 0.001). Similarly, there was no evidence of any difference in the variability of baseline values or gradients of slopes by pubertal status in either boys or girls for either FT3 or FT4. Although BMI at age 7 was also associated with Tanner stage at age 13, B = 0.08 (95% CI 0.06, 0.09), P < 0.001, and FT3, B = 0.04 (95% CI 0.03, 0.05), P < 0.001, adjusting for BMI at age 7 had no substantial effect on the relationship between FT3 and Tanner stage. Analysis of the association between FT3 and Tanner stage when adjusted for sex was B = 0.12 (95% CI 0.07, 0.12), P < 0.001; adding BMI to the model had a minimal impact on effect estimates, B = 0.10 (95% CI 0.05, 0.15), P < 0.001. Furthermore, adjustment for BMI in the linear mixed models performed by pubertal status revealed very similar results to our original analysis (Supplemental Table 4).
Table 3.

Linear Mixed Models for TSH FT





P1
P2
P3
ParameterGroupMeasureFactorCoefficient95% CIP ValueCoefficient95% CIP ValueCoefficient95% CIP Value
TSHBoysMain effectsAge 72.372.28, 2.46<0.0012.42.3, 2.51<0.0012.382.29, 2.46<0.001
Slope0.0020, 0.0040.050.001−0.001, 0.0030.190.001−0.001, 0.0020.26
VariabilitySD@ Age 70.920.85, 0.980.940.86, 1.010.940.88, 1.01
SDSlope0.010.01, 0.010.010.01, 0.010.010.01, 0.01
Correlation (int, slope)−0.47−0.59, −0.34−0.41−0.57, −0.26−0.46−0.58, −0.33
T3BoysMain effectsAge 76.146.08, 6.2<0.0016.186.11, 6.25<0.0016.326.26, 6.38<0.001
Slope0.0020.0003, 0.0030.010−0.001, 0.0010.99−0.003−0.004, −0.002<0.001
VariabilitySD@ Age 70.630.59, 0.680.590.54, 0.640.630.58, 0.67
SDSlope0.0080.007, 0.0090.010.008, 0.010.0090.008, 0.01
Correlation (int, slope)−0.53−0.64, −0.41−0.66−0.77, −0.56−0.62−0.71, −0.52
T4BoysMain effectsAge 715.615.4, 15.7<0.00115.615.5, 15.8<0.00115.515.3, 15.6<0.001
Slope−0.004−0.007, −0.0010.02−0.004−0.008, −0.0010.020.0050.002, 0.0090.001
VariabilitySD@ Age 71.581.47, 1.691.61.46, 1.731.661.54, 1.77
SDSlope0.020.02, 0.030.020.02, 0.030.020.02, 0.03
Correlation (int, slope)−0.5−0.62, −0.38−0.5−0.64, −0.36−0.33−0.47, −0.19
TSHGirlsMain effectsAge 72.162.04, 2.28<0.0012.282.17, 2.39<0.0012.22.13, 2.27<0.001
Slope0.0004−0.001, 0.0020.710.001−0.001, 0.0030.210.001−0.003, 0.0020.15
VariabilitySD@ Age 70.860.76, 0.940.950.87, 1.020.920.88, 0.97
SDSlope0.010.01, 0.010.010.01, 0.010.010.01, 0.01
Correlation (int, slope)−0.6−0.74, −0.45−0.57−0.7, −0.45−0.52−0.61, −0.44
T3GirlsMain effectsAge 76.276.19, 6.36<0.0016.276.2, 6.34<0.0016.376.32, 6.41<0.001
Slope−0.007−0.009, −0.005<0.001−0.007−0.008, −0.006<0.001−0.01−0.01, −0.01<0.001
VariabilitySD@ Age 70.60.54, 0.660.630.57, 0.680.620.59, 0.65
SDSlope0.0080.007, 0.010.0080.006, 0.0090.0090.008, 0.01
Correlation (int, slope)−0.77−0.86, −0.68−0.57−0.7, −0.44−0.6−0.67, −0.52
T4GirlsMain effectsAge 715.915.6, 16.2<0.00115.815.6, 16<0.00115.915.8, 16<0.001
Slope−0.004−0.008, 0.00030.07−0.002−0.006, 0.0020.43−0.004−0.006, −0.0010.005
VariabilitySD@ Age 71.881.68, 2.061.791.64, 1.931.771.68, 1.86
SDSlope0.020.02, 0.020.020.02, 0.030.020.02, 0.03
Correlation (int, slope)−0.42−0.61, −0.23−0.43−0.58, −0.27−0.43−0.53, −0.33
Linear Mixed Models for TSH FT

Relationship between TSH and serum thyroid hormone levels in children at ages 7 and 15 years

At age 7 years, TSH was weakly positively associated with FT3 after adjusting for age, sex, FT4, and markers of social class and early life environment, B standardized (std) = 0.03 (95% CI 0.001, 0.06), P = 0.05, whereas TSH was clearly negatively associated with FT4, B (std) = −0.07 (95% CI −0.10, −0.04), P = 3.49 × 10−05 (Supplemental Table 5). A similar pattern was also observed at age 15 years even after adjusting for pubertal status, with TSH positively associated with FT3, B (std) = 0.07 (95% CI 0.02, 0.13), P = 0.01, and negatively associated with FT4, B (std) = −0.13 (95% CI −0.19, −0.07), P = 5.16 × 10−06 (Supplemental Table 5). FT3 and FT4 were positively associated with each other at age 7 years, B (std) = 0.27 (95% CI 0.24, 0.30), P = 1.12 × 10−14, and also at age 15 years, B = 0.19 (95% CI 0.12, 0.26), P = 4.23 × 10−07. Seemingly unrelated regression identified that the positive impact of TSH on FT3 was greater at age 15 years than at age 7 years (P = 0.001), but no difference was observed with FT4 (P = 0.84).

Discussion

Our results from a longitudinal analysis of a large population birth cohort demonstrate that there are substantial changes in the pituitary–thyroid axis over childhood. In particular, FT3 changes much more over childhood than either TSH or FT4. Levels of FT3 at age 7 are high compared with adult values, with almost 25% of children at age 7 years having a FT3 level above the adult reference range. Although there is a substantial fall in FT3 levels between age 7 years and age 15 years, 10% are still above the adult reference range. There was a very strong negative correlation between hormone levels between ages 7 and 15, indicating that the substantial variability observed in early childhood is reduced through puberty, with hormone levels converging to near adult reference values. Overall, our data suggest that there may be higher conversion of FT4 to FT3 in younger children than adults. Our observation that boys maintain a higher FT3 for longer than girls is also noteworthy, and may have substantial importance in observed sex differences in bone development (21) and other phenotypes (2). The reason that children have higher FT3 levels at age 7 years is unclear but may be due to factors external to the pituitary–thyroid axis, such as fat mass and pubertal development (16). In the current study, we noted that children that reached puberty earlier (as indicated by more advanced self-reported pubertal stage at age 13 years) had higher FT3 values at age 7 years and a negative FT3 slope between ages 7 and 15 years, whereas those with less advanced puberty had a positive FT3 slope between ages 7 and 15 years. Using both serum thyroid function and then genetic data to perform Mendelian Randomization, we have recently reported that BMI and fat mass in children are positively and causally related to FT3 (16). Although the effect of FT3 on puberty is interestingly largely independent of BMI, it is, however, still possible that FT3 is an indicator of nutritional state and hence pubertal readiness in early childhood in a manner similar to leptin. Alternatively, the observed changes may represent changes in the thyroid gland in preparation for puberty, or be a consequence of changes in other endocrine factors such as growth hormone, as growth hormone therapy has been linked to marginally increased FT3 and decreased FT4 levels (22). We have also identified a difference in the relationship between TSH and the two thyroid hormones FT3 and FT4 in childhood, with higher TSH being associated with higher FT3, whereas an inverse association was identified with FT4. The positive association between TSH and FT3 in childhood has been highlighted recently in children with borderline thyroid status (23). This observation provides insight into childhood TSH-FT4 and TSH-FT3 relationships that are relevant to our understanding of both thyroid physiology and the laboratory diagnosis of thyroid disease. It is interesting to speculate the life course of FT3 levels given it is well established that FT3 in particular declines in the elderly (24); the pattern of FT3 through life may therefore be a fall over childhood (25), then plateauing throughout adult life, before falling again in older age. We believe our findings are also clinically relevant, given the striking differences observed in early childhood thyroid hormone levels from adult-derived reference ranges. If age- and sex-appropriate reference ranges are not used, there may be substantial overdiagnosis of subclinical thyroid disease in children. In addition, our finding that children have substantially higher FT3 levels than adults may have implications for thyroid hormone replacement in children. Individuals on levothyroxine have a higher FT4 and a lower FT3 than euthyroid individuals despite having similar TSH levels (26–28). Children on levothyroxine might therefore have inadequate FT3 levels for optimal timing of puberty and other developmental processes. It is noteworthy that hypothyroidism diagnosed in prepubertal years can cause a delay of puberty (29). It is also possible that the relative lack of FT3 in these children may potentially be one of the reasons that optimal IQ levels are not reached in children with congenital hypothyroidism despite adequate levothyroxine therapy (30). Taken together, there remains a pressing need for further study of central and peripheral determinants of thyroid function as well as determinants of intracellular thyroid status in children. Strengths of our dataset include the use of a large population birth cohort with detailed phenotypic data available and paired thyroid function at two age points, which allows more robust analysis than previous studies of cross-sectional samples. The nature of the cohort means it is unlikely that interfering medications or heterophilic antibodies have influenced results. Furthermore, our use of liner mixed models has allowed us to determine the change of TSH and thyroid hormone levels between ages 7 and 15, while simultaneously adjusting for an individual’s baseline hormone levels, allowing us to investigate how variability reduces as children progress into adulthood. Limitations of our study include a higher social class bias in our dataset and lack of generalizability to ethnic minorities, as 98% of all samples analyzed were in individuals of Caucasian descent. A weakness is that paired samples were also not all performed on the same assay run. Furthermore, all individuals were from a small region of the UK that has been shown to be borderline iodine deficient (31). Our findings require replication in individuals from other ethnic groups and using different thyroid hormone assays from an area of iodine sufficiency. In conclusion, our results demonstrate that thyroid hormone levels change substantially during childhood and adolescence. This is particularly the case with FT3, which is substantially higher in younger children. FT3 levels also appear to influence the onset of puberty; further studies into the pituitary–thyroid axis in normal childhood populations are therefore needed to define the role of higher FT3 levels in childhood more precisely.
  30 in total

1.  Pediatric reference intervals for 28 chemistries and immunoassays on the Roche cobas 6000 analyzer--a CALIPER pilot study.

Authors:  Vathany Kulasingam; Benjamin P Jung; Ivan M Blasutig; Sanaz Baradaran; Man Khun Chan; Mujdat Aytekin; David A Colantonio; Khosrow Adeli
Journal:  Clin Biochem       Date:  2010-05-23       Impact factor: 3.281

Review 2.  Thyroid function and aging: do serum 3,5,3'-triiodothyronine and thyroid-stimulating hormone concentrations give the Janus response?

Authors:  Stefano Mariotti
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.958

3.  Heritability of serum TSH, free T4 and free T3 concentrations: a study of a large UK twin cohort.

Authors:  V Panicker; S G Wilson; T D Spector; S J Brown; M Falchi; J B Richards; G L Surdulescu; E M Lim; S J Fletcher; J P Walsh
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  2007-10-29       Impact factor: 3.478

4.  Narrow individual variations in serum T(4) and T(3) in normal subjects: a clue to the understanding of subclinical thyroid disease.

Authors:  Stig Andersen; Klaus Michael Pedersen; Niels Henrik Bruun; Peter Laurberg
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.958

5.  The evolution of thyroid function with puberty.

Authors:  Raman Kumar Marwaha; Nikhil Tandon; Ankush K Desai; Ratnesh Kanwar; Aparna Sastry; Archna Narang; Satveer Singh; Kuntal Bhadra; Kalavani Mani
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.478

6.  Congenital hypothyroidism: influence of disease severity and L-thyroxine treatment on intellectual, motor, and school-associated outcomes in young adults.

Authors:  Beate Oerbeck; Kjetil Sundet; Bengt F Kase; Sonja Heyerdahl
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Cohort Profile: the 'children of the 90s'--the index offspring of the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children.

Authors:  Andy Boyd; Jean Golding; John Macleod; Debbie A Lawlor; Abigail Fraser; John Henderson; Lynn Molloy; Andy Ness; Susan Ring; George Davey Smith
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 7.196

8.  Pediatric reference intervals for thyroid hormone levels from birth to adulthood: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Klaus Kapelari; Christine Kirchlechner; Wolfgang Högler; Katharina Schweitzer; Irene Virgolini; Roy Moncayo
Journal:  BMC Endocr Disord       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 2.763

9.  Paradoxical Relationship Between Body Mass Index and Thyroid Hormone Levels: A Study Using Mendelian Randomization.

Authors:  Peter N Taylor; Rebecca Richmond; Neil Davies; Adrian Sayers; Kirsty Stevenson; Wolfram Woltersdorf; Andrew Taylor; Alix Groom; Kate Northstone; Susan Ring; Onyebuchi Okosieme; Aled Rees; Dorothea Nitsch; Graham R Williams; George Davey Smith; John W Gregory; Nicholas J Timpson; Jonathan H Tobias; Colin M Dayan
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 5.958

10.  Effect of inadequate iodine status in UK pregnant women on cognitive outcomes in their children: results from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC).

Authors:  Sarah C Bath; Colin D Steer; Jean Golding; Pauline Emmett; Margaret P Rayman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Hypothyroidism after radiation exposure: brief narrative review.

Authors:  Christoph Reiners; Valentina Drozd; Shunichi Yamashita
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 3.575

2.  Prenatal dioxin exposure and thyroid hormone levels in the Seveso second generation study.

Authors:  Marcella Warner; Stephen Rauch; Jennifer Ames; Paolo Mocarelli; Paolo Brambilla; Stefano Signorini; Brenda Eskenazi
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 6.498

3.  Evidence-Based Use of Levothyroxine/Liothyronine Combinations in Treating Hypothyroidism: A Consensus Document.

Authors:  Jacqueline Jonklaas; Antonio C Bianco; Anne R Cappola; Francesco S Celi; Eric Fliers; Heike Heuer; Elizabeth A McAninch; Lars C Moeller; Birte Nygaard; Anna M Sawka; Torquil Watt; Colin M Dayan
Journal:  Eur Thyroid J       Date:  2021-02-16

4.  Epigenome-Wide Association Study of Thyroid Function Traits Identifies Novel Associations of fT3 With KLF9 and DOT1L.

Authors:  Nicole Lafontaine; Purdey J Campbell; Juan E Castillo-Fernandez; Shelby Mullin; Ee Mun Lim; Phillip Kendrew; Michelle Lewer; Suzanne J Brown; Rae-Chi Huang; Phillip E Melton; Trevor A Mori; Lawrence J Beilin; Frank Dudbridge; Tim D Spector; Margaret J Wright; Nicholas G Martin; Allan F McRae; Vijay Panicker; Gu Zhu; John P Walsh; Jordana T Bell; Scott G Wilson
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 5.  Evidence-Based Use of Levothyroxine/Liothyronine Combinations in Treating Hypothyroidism: A Consensus Document.

Authors:  Jacqueline Jonklaas; Antonio C Bianco; Anne R Cappola; Francesco S Celi; Eric Fliers; Heike Heuer; Elizabeth A McAninch; Lars C Moeller; Birte Nygaard; Anna M Sawka; Torquil Watt; Colin M Dayan
Journal:  Thyroid       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 6.568

6.  Inherited Selenocysteine Transfer RNA Mutation: Clinical and Hormonal Evaluation of 2 Patients.

Authors:  Aurore Geslot; Frédérique Savagner; Philippe Caron
Journal:  Eur Thyroid J       Date:  2021-08-26

Review 7.  Combination Thyroid Hormone Replacement; Knowns and Unknowns.

Authors:  Peter N Taylor; Vinay Eligar; Ilaria Muller; Anna Scholz; Colin Dayan; Onyebuchi Okosieme
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 5.555

8.  Free triiodothyronine/free thyroxine ratio in children with congenital hypothyroidism.

Authors:  Carmen Sydlik; Ilja Dubinski; Susanne Bechtold; Heinrich Schmidt
Journal:  Endocr Connect       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 3.221

9.  The association between thyroid function biomarkers and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Diana Albrecht; Till Ittermann; Michael Thamm; Hans-Jörgen Grabe; Martin Bahls; Henry Völzke
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Thyroid Function Changes and Pubertal Progress in Females: A Longitudinal Study in Iodine-Sufficient Areas of East China.

Authors:  Yingying Wang; Dandan He; Chaowei Fu; Xiaolian Dong; Feng Jiang; Meifang Su; Qian Xu; Peixin Huang; Na Wang; Yue Chen; Qingwu Jiang
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 5.555

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.