Literature DB >> 28471962

Evaluating osteoporotic fracture risk with the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool in Chinese patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Juan Meng1, Yanchun Li, Xiaoxu Yuan, Yuewu Lu.   

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the discriminative and predictive capacity of the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) to determine the 10-year risk of osteoporotic fracture in Chinese rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.This study included 168 RA patients and 168 healthy individuals as controls. The Chinese mainland FRAX model was applied to calculate the 10-year risk of osteoporotic fractures, defined as fracture of the spine, forearm, hip, or shoulder.The incidence of osteoporosis was significantly increased in RA patients compared to controls (P < .05). Bone mineral density (BMD), lumbar vertebra T-score, and femoral neck T-score were significantly lower in RA patients compared to controls (P < .05). BMD, disease duration, DAS28, and glucocorticoid use were important risk factors for osteoporotic fractures in Chinese RA patients. Ten-year osteoporotic fracture risk in Chinese RA patients was higher when BMD was incorporated in FRAX.There was a higher incidence of osteoporosis and reduced BMD in RA patients compared to controls. The FRAX model should integrate femoral neck BMD with other risk factors to evaluate osteoporotic fracture risk in RA patients, making it a valuable screening tool.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28471962      PMCID: PMC5419908          DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006677

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)        ISSN: 0025-7974            Impact factor:   1.889


Introduction

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disorder that manifests as symmetrical, progressive, and erosive arthritis.[ RA patients have an elevated incidence of reduced bone mass and osteoporosis due to active systemic inflammation and corticosteroid use. As a consequence, RA patients have a high risk of fracture, an outcome that can lead to impaired quality of life.[ In recent years, research has focused on the identification of risk factors associated with osteoporotic fractures in RA patients, including RA disease duration, lack of physical activity, smoking, and glucocorticoid use.[ In particular, reduced bone mineral density (BMD) is a risk factor for osteoporosis in patients with RA, including those who do not receive oral glucocorticoids.[ Currently, clinical diagnosis and assessment of osteoporosis is often made based on BMD evaluation using dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). BMD is commonly assessed by DXA in most RA patients with obvious clinical symptoms or secondary osteoporosis. However, other key risk factors for osteoporosis are not included when considering the probability of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures in this patient population.[ Since the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) was developed by the World Health Organization (WHO) in February 2008, it has been widely used for treatment decision making in osteoporosis. This Web-based algorithm has been incorporated into DXA reporting software to calculate the 10-year probability of major osteoporotic fracture of the vertebral column, hip, forearm, and humerus, and the 10-year probability of hip fracture in men and women based on easily obtained clinical risk factors and BMD of the femoral neck (optional). Algorithms that evaluate the probability of fractures and produce absolute risk estimates have been developed in various settings, and these are becoming widely available. FRAX is one of the most common FRAXs. FRAX incorporates demographic and clinical risk factors such as body mass index (BMI), and previous fracture to evaluate the 10-year risk of fractures and predict mortality.[ FRAX has been used to assess the risk of fractures in postmenopausal women, and various country-specific FRAX models have been developed.[ However, to the authors’ knowledge, FRAX has not been used to investigate risk factors or predict osteoporotic fracture risk in Chinese RA patients. This study investigated the value of the Chinese-specific FRAX model as an FRAX in Chinese RA patients, and the role of osteoporotic-specific risk factors when evaluating the 10-year risk of osteoporotic fractures in this patient population.

Methods

Study population

This retrospective study included patients treated in our department for RA between 2012 and 2014. Patients who were ≥28 years old and diagnosed with RA were included. The diagnosis of RA was made in accordance with the 1987 American College of Rheumatology revised RA classification criteria. Exclusion criteria were: type I diabetes, osteogenesis imperfecta, untreated long-term hyperthyroidism, hypogonadism, premature menopause (≤45 years of age), chronic malnutrition, malabsorption, or chronic liver or kidney disease. A control group consisted of healthy individuals who visited the outpatient department of our hospital medical center. Patients with serious liver and kidney diseases, metabolic bone disease, and those on medication were excluded. The Ethics Committee of our hospital approved this study, and all patients gave their written informed consent.

Data collection

Demographic and clinical characteristics, including age, height, weight, BMI, smoking history, alcohol use, history of fragility fracture, family history of fragility fracture, BMD, lumbar vertebra (L1-L4) T-score, femoral neck T-score, DAS28, and oral glucocorticoid use (time and dosage), were recorded for all study participants. Blood samples were collected from all study participants in the morning and analyzed for erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), rheumatoid factor (RF), C-reactive protein (CRP), and anticyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP).

Bone densitometry

The BMD of L1-L4 and the femoral neck were measured utilizing DXA (GE Lunar Prodigy, Madison, WI). BMD (g/cm2) and T-scores were calculated. Outcomes were categorized according to WHO diagnostic criteria,[ where: T > −1.0 is considered normal; T > −2.5−≤ −1.0 is considered reduced bone mass; and T ≤ −2.5 is considered osteoporosis.

Chinese-specific FRAX model

The Chinese mainland FRAX model (http://www.shef.ac.uk/FRAX/) was used in this study. The model uses clinical data to calculate the 10-year risk of fractures in Chinese individuals.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed by 2 independent investigators using SPSS v19.0 software (SPSS Inc., USA). All data are expressed as mean ± SD. Students t test or chi-square test was used to evaluate differences between groups. Correlations between variables were analyzed using Spearman correlation analysis. Receiver-operating characteristic curve and area under the curve were used to evaluate the 10-year risk of osteoporotic fractures in RA patients according to FRAX with or without BMD as a risk factor. P < .05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Baseline characteristics

This study included 168 RA patients, of which 23.2% (39) were male and 76.8% (129) were female. Average age was 54.3 ± 8.7 years (range, 28–80 years), and mean disease duration was 12.2 ± 9.5 years (range, 2–23 years). The control group included 168 participants, of which 27.38% (48) were male and 72.62% (122) were female. There were no significant differences in the baseline demographic and clinical characteristics between RA patients and controls (Table 1).
Table 1

Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics in RA patients and participants in the control group.

Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics in RA patients and participants in the control group.

BMD and T-score

In RA patients, the incidence of osteoporosis was 41.1%; 43 cases were classified as normal, 56 cases were classified as reduced bone mass, and 69 cases were classified as osteoporosis. In controls, the incidence of osteoporosis was 21.43%; 103 cases were classified as normal, 29 cases were classified as reduced bone mass, and 36 cases were classified as osteoporosis. The incidence of osteoporosis was significantly higher in RA patients compared to controls (P < .05). The BMD and T-score of L1–L4 and the femoral neck were significantly lower in RA patients compared to controls (P < .05) (Table 2). Analysis of patients stratified by gender showed a higher incidence of osteoporosis and a lower BMD and T-score of L1–L4 in male and female RA patients compared to controls (P < .05, Table 3).
Table 2

BMD and T-score of L1–L4 and the femoral neck in RA patients and controls.

Table 3

BMD and T-score of L1–L4 and the femoral neck in male and female patients and controls.

BMD and T-score of L1–L4 and the femoral neck in RA patients and controls. BMD and T-score of L1–L4 and the femoral neck in male and female patients and controls.

Ten-year risk of osteoporotic fractures

The 10-year risk of hip fracture was (0.62 ± 0.11)% in RA patients and (0.17 ± 0.13)% in controls when BMD of the femoral neck was incorporated in FRAX. The 10-year risk of hip fracture was (0.56 ± 0.18)% in RA patients and (0.21 ± 0.61)% in controls when BMD of the femoral neck was not incorporated in FRAX. The 10-year risk of hip fracture in RA patients was significantly higher when BMD of the femoral neck was incorporated in FRAX compared with and without BMD (Table 4). Similar findings were found in male and female RA patients (Table 5).
Table 4

The 10-year risk of osteoporotic fracture in RA patients and controls.

Table 5

The 10-year risk of osteoporotic fracture in male and female RA patients and controls.

The 10-year risk of osteoporotic fracture in RA patients and controls. The 10-year risk of osteoporotic fracture in male and female RA patients and controls. The 10-year risk of major osteoporotic fracture was (4.04 ± 0.83)% in RA patients and (2.29 ± 0.61)% in controls when BMD was incorporated in FRAX. The 10-year risk of major osteoporotic fracture was (3.86 ± 0.71)% in RA patients and (2.02 ± 0.66)% in controls when BMD was not incorporated in FRAX. The 10-year risk of major osteroporosis in RA patients was significantly higher when BMD of the femoral neck was incorporated in FRAX compared with and without BMD (Table 4). Similar findings were found in male and female RA patients (Table 5). Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the area under the curve for 10-year risk of major osteoporotic fracture was 70.2% in RA patients when BMD was incorporated in FRAX and 68.2% when BMD was not incorporated in FRAX (Fig. 1).
Figure 1

Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve for 10-year risk of major osteoporotic fracture.

Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve for 10-year risk of major osteoporotic fracture.

Risk factor analysis

The risk of hip fractures was negatively correlated with the BMD of L1–L4 (r = 0.734, P < .05) and femoral neck (r = 0.708, P < .01), and positively correlated with disease duration (r = 0.553, P < .05), DAS28 (r = 0.578, P < .05), and GC (r = 0.602, P < .05). No obvious correlation was found between ESR, CRP, RF, anti-CCP, and hip fractures. Similar results were identified in osteoporotic fractures (Table 6).
Table 6

Risk factor analysis.

Risk factor analysis.

Discussion

This study evaluated the 10-year risk of osteoporotic fractures in Chinese RA patients and healthy individuals using the Chinese mainland FRAX model. Results showed that the BMD and T-score were lower and the 10-year risk of osteoporotic fractures was higher in Chinese RA patients compared with healthy individuals. BMD, disease duration, DAS28, and glucocorticoid use were important risk factors for hip and major osteoporotic fractures in Chinese RA patients, and the 10-year risk of osteoporotic fractures in Chinese RA patients was higher when BMD was incorporated in the FRAX model. In accordance with our findings, previous studies show that the rate of osteoporosis and the incidence of osteoporotic fractures are significantly increased in RA patients compared to the general population.[ The systemic effects of rheumatoid inflammation, immobility, nutritional problems, and weight loss are reported to increase bone resorption and contribute to osteoporosis in RA patients.[ We used FRAX, which provides an easily applied and clinically relevant method for estimating the individual risk of fractures in RA patients. FRAX includes data routinely recorded in medical records, thus providing general practitioners the potential to use FRAX to evaluate the risk of fractures in RA patients in primary care. Currently, BMD is a major index for osteoporosis diagnosis. However, secondary osteoporosis in RA patients is considered a multifactorial disease. Therefore, BMD in combination with other risk factors should be used to predict the risk of fractures in patients with secondary osteoporosis. It is widely believed that treatments for osteoporosis are only effective in patients with reduced BMD. Thus, the use of FRAX without BMD to identify individuals is the subject of some debate and is a research topic of considerable interest. In fact, Kanis et al[ found that including BMD of the femoral neck in the FRAX model when calculating the probability of fracture facilitates the identification of patients who are most likely to require clinical intervention. In this study, we found that the Chinese mainland FRAX model that incorporated BMD of the femoral neck was superior for evaluating 10-year risk of osteoporotic fractures in Chinese patients with RA compared to the model without BMD. Similarly, Fraser et al[ reported that the Canadian FRAX model that incorporated BMD of the femoral neck was superior for predicting osteroporotic fracture in a Canadian population compared to the model without BMD; the authors concluded that the Canadian FRAX model that includes BMD of the femoral neck can be used to identify osteoporotic patients who require treatment. Furthermore, evidence suggests that the Spanish FRAX model that does not include BMD underestimates the risk of osteroporotic fracture in Spanish populations.[ Although several studies have reported that the use of FRAX for evaluating the risk of fracture in patients with inflammatory arthritis,[ to our knowledge, this is the first study to use the Chinese-mainland FRAX model to evaluate fracture risk in Chinese patients with RA. In accordance with previous findings, our study showed that the risk of osteoporotic fractures in Chinese RA patients was highest with the FRAX model that included BMD. The current study identified BMD, disease duration, DAS28, and glucocorticoid use as important risk factors for osteoporotic fractures in Chinese RA. These data are in accordance with previously published reports.[ In particular, 3 months of oral glucocorticoids and glucocorticoid ≥7.5 mg/day is associated with an increase in fracture risk. Long-term use of glucocorticoids can inhibit the intestinal absorption of calcium and promote calcium excretion, leading to lower serum calcium and bone resorption. Glucocorticoids can inhibit collagen synthesis and mineralization by osteoblasts and increase the activity of osteoclasts.[ This study was associated with several limitations. First, the data were obtained retrospectively from a relative small patient population who were admitted to our department, which is located in a single-center. The evaluation of the small sample size and unmatched groups can introduce bias. Well-designed prospective studies are required to confirm our findings. Second, the follow-up duration was short. Third, the 10-year probability of fractures in RA patients was evaluated while pharmacological interventions were used. Bisphosphonates and selective estrogen receptor modulators reduce osteoporotic fractures. Therefore, the probability of fractures in RA patients receiving pharmacotherapies may differ from untreated patients.

Conclusion

In summary, this study found a higher incidence of osteoporosis and reduced BMD in RA patients compared to healthy individuals. The FRAX model should include risk factors for osteoporotic fractures such as BMD, disease duration and activity, and glucocorticoid use when assessing the probability of fractures in RA patients.
  27 in total

1.  The relation between joint erosion and generalized osteoporosis and disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Filiz Sivas; Nurdan Barça; Mustafa Onder; Kürşat Ozoran
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2006-04-20       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 2.  Rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  David L Scott; Frederick Wolfe; Tom W J Huizinga
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  FRAX updates 2012.

Authors:  Eugene McCloskey; John A Kanis
Journal:  Curr Opin Rheumatol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 4.  Management of osteoporosis in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

Authors:  Jos N Hoes; Irene E M Bultink; Willem F Lems
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 3.889

Review 5.  FRAX(®) with and without bone mineral density.

Authors:  John A Kanis; Eugene McCloskey; Helena Johansson; Anders Oden; William D Leslie
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2011-11-06       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  Fracture prediction and calibration of a Canadian FRAX® tool: a population-based report from CaMos.

Authors:  L-A Fraser; L Langsetmo; C Berger; G Ioannidis; D Goltzman; J D Adachi; A Papaioannou; R Josse; C S Kovacs; W P Olszynski; T Towheed; D A Hanley; S M Kaiser; J Prior; S Jamal; N Kreiger; J P Brown; H Johansson; A Oden; E McCloskey; J A Kanis; W D Leslie
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Characteristics of fracture and related factors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Akihide Nampei; Jun Hashimoto; Junichiro Koyanagi; Takeshi Ono; Hideo Hashimoto; Noriyuki Tsumaki; Tetsuya Tomita; Kazuomi Sugamoto; Norihiro Nishimoto; Takahiro Ochi; Hideki Yoshikawa
Journal:  Mod Rheumatol       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 3.023

8.  Osteoporosis in rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  D Vosse; K de Vlam
Journal:  Clin Exp Rheumatol       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.473

9.  Osteoporosis in rheumatoid arthritis: effect of disease activity.

Authors:  R Celiker; Y Gökçe-Kutsal; A Cindas; M Ariyürek; N Renda; Z Koray; O Basgöze
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 2.980

10.  The risk of osteoporotic fractures according to the FRAX model in Korean patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Jae Ho Lee; Young Sun Suh; Jung Hee Koh; Seung-Min Jung; Jennifer Jooha Lee; Seung-Ki Kwok; Ji Hyeon Ju; Kyung-Su Park; Sung-Hwan Park
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 2.153

View more
  10 in total

1.  The Influence of Rheumatoid Arthritis on Higher Reoperation Rates over Time Following Lumbar Spinal Fusion-A Nationwide Cohort Study.

Authors:  Jin-Sung Park; Se-Jun Park; Jiwon Park; Gijun Shin; Jae-Young Hong
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 4.964

2.  Surgical Management of the Lumbar Spine in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Authors:  Peter Joo; Laurence Ge; Addisu Mesfin
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2019-11-06

3.  The association between 10-year fracture risk by FRAX and osteoporotic fractures with disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Ratanapha Phuan-Udom; Nittaya Lektrakul; Wanruchada Katchamart
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 4.  Consensus recommendations on managing the selected comorbidities including cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis, and interstitial lung disease in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Kuang-Hui Yu; Hsin-Hua Chen; Tien-Tsai Cheng; Yeong-Jian Jan; Meng-Yu Weng; Yeong-Jang Lin; Hung-An Chen; Jui-Tseng Cheng; Kuang-Yung Huang; Ko-Jen Li; Yu-Jih Su; Pui-Ying Leong; Wen-Chan Tsai; Joung-Liang Lan; Der-Yuan Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Establishment of a preliminary FRAX®-based intervention threshold for rheumatoid arthritis-associated fragility fracture: a 3-year longitudinal, observational, cohort study.

Authors:  Shan-Fu Yu; Ming-Han Chen; Jia-Feng Chen; Yu-Wei Wang; Ying-Chou Chen; Chung-Yuan Hsu; Han-Ming Lai; Wen-Chan Chiu; Chi-Hua Ko; Hsiao-Ru He; Tien-Tsai Cheng
Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 5.091

6.  The prevalence of osteoporosis in rheumatoid arthritis patient: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Samaneh Moshayedi; Baharak Tasorian; Amir Almasi-Hashiani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Tocilizumab potentially prevents bone loss in patients with anticitrullinated protein antibody-positive rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Yi-Ming Chen; Hsin-Hua Chen; Wen-Nan Huang; Tsai-Ling Liao; Jun-Peng Chen; Wen-Cheng Chao; Ching-Tsai Lin; Wei-Ting Hung; Chia-Wei Hsieh; Tsu-Yi Hsieh; Yi-Hsing Chen; Der-Yuan Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Male patients with rheumatoid arthritis have an increased risk of osteoporosis: Frequency and risk factors.

Authors:  Seong-Min Kweon; Dong Hyun Sohn; Ji-Heh Park; Jung Hee Koh; Eun-Kyoung Park; Han-Na Lee; Keunyoung Kim; Yunkyung Kim; Geun-Tae Kim; Seung-Geun Lee
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  Study of vertebral fracture and Scanographic Bone Attenuation Coefficient in rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis vs. controls.

Authors:  Marine Fauny; Eliane Albuisson; Elodie Bauer; Julia Perrier-Cornet; Isabelle Chary-Valckenaere; Damien Loeuille
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Effect of downregulation of serum MMP-3 levels by traditional Chinese medicine ingredients combined with methotrexate on the progression of bone injury in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yue Sun; Yucheng Huang; Tiantian Chen; Xueping Li; Jiayi Chen; Zhuozhi Wang; Kexin Lin; Yongxiang Gao; Lisha He
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 1.817

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.