Literature DB >> 28471703

RhinAsthma patient perspective: A Rasch validation study.

Giorgia Molinengo1, Ilaria Baiardini2, Fulvio Braido2, Barbara Loera1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In daily practice, Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) tools are useful for supplementing clinical data with the patient's perspective. To encourage their use by clinicians, the availability of tools that can quickly provide valid results is crucial. A new HRQoL tool has been proposed for patients with asthma and rhinitis: the RhinAsthma Patient Perspective-RAPP. The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric robustness of the RAPP using the Item Response Theory (IRT) approach, to evaluate the scalability of items and test whether or not patients use the items response scale correctly.
METHODS: 155 patients (53.5% women, mean age 39.1, range 16-76) were recruited during a multicenter study. RAPP metric properties were investigated using IRT models. Differential item functioning (DIF) was used for gender, age, and asthma control test (ACT).
RESULTS: The RAPP adequately fitted the Rating Scale model, demonstrating the equality of the rating scale structure for all items. All statistics on items were satisfactory. The RAPP had adequate internal reliability and showed good ability to discriminate among different groups of participants. DIF analysis indicated that there were no differential item functioning issues for gender. One item showed a DIF by age and four items by ACT.
CONCLUSIONS: The psychometric evaluation performed using IRT models demonstrated that the RAPP met all the criteria to be considered a reliable and valid method of measurement. From a clinical perspective, this will allow physicians to confidently interpret scores as good indicators of Quality of Life of patients with asthma.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assessment; DIF; Rasch; asthma; quality of life questionnaire; rhinitis; validation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28471703     DOI: 10.1080/02770903.2017.1316391

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Asthma        ISSN: 0277-0903            Impact factor:   2.515


  4 in total

1.  Prospective Validation of the Decalogue, a Set of Doctor-Patient Communication Recommendations to Improve Patient Illness Experience and Mood States within a Hospital Cardiologic Ambulatory Setting.

Authors:  Piercarlo Ballo; Massimo Milli; Carly Slater; Fabrizio Bandini; Federico Trentanove; Giulia Comper; Alfredo Zuppiroli; Stefania Polvani
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Disease awareness in patients with COPD: measurement and extent.

Authors:  Ilaria Baiardini; Paola Rogliani; Pierachille Santus; Angelo G Corsico; Marco Contoli; Nicola Scichilone; Fabiano Di Marco; Patrizia Lessi; Carla Scognamillo; Giorgia Molinengo; Fabio Ferri; Vincenzo Patella; Giuseppe Fiorentino; Mauro Carone; Fulvio Braido
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2018-12-17

3.  Improving the psychometric properties of the dissociative experiences scale (DES-II): a Rasch validation study.

Authors:  Aristide Saggino; Giorgia Molinengo; Guyonne Rogier; Carlo Garofalo; Barbara Loera; Marco Tommasi; Patrizia Velotti
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 3.630

4.  Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the RhinAsthma Patient Perspective (RAPP) in the Polish population.

Authors:  Maciej Kupczyk; Ilaria Baiardini; Giorgia Molinengo; Barbara Loera; Dorota Szydłowska; Piotr Kuna; Giorgio Walter Canonica; Fulvio Braido
Journal:  Postepy Dermatol Alergol       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 1.837

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.