Literature DB >> 28470963

Differences in the progress of the biopesticide revolution between the EU and other major crop-growing regions.

Adalbert Balog1, Tibor Hartel2, Hugh D Loxdale3, Kenneth Wilson4.   

Abstract

The five-year value in the compound annual growth rate of the biopesticides sector is predicted to be 16% by 2017 and to produce a global market worth $US 10 billion. Despite this, several impediments occur within the EU that negatively affect biopesticide research and innovation. At present, there are fewer biopesticide-active substances registered in the EU compared with the United States, India, Brazil and China. The relatively low level of biopesticide research in the EU (6880 ISI papers) versus the United States (18 839), India (9501) and China (7875) relates to the greater complexity of EU-based biopesticide regulations compared with these other countries. In this light, it is worth noting that tensions may exist between regulators that emphasise the beneficial nature of biopesticides in environmentally friendly crop management and those that adopt a more technologically based approach dependent on a chemical-pesticide-driven model. Compared with the other aforementioned countries, far fewer biopesticide products are available in the EU market, mainly as a direct result of the severe regulatory factors present there. The extent to which this trend will continue depends largely on a range of interacting political and/or regulatory decisions that influence environmentally friendly agricultural industries.
© 2017 Society of Chemical Industry. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biopesticide research; environmental laws; environmentally friendly agriculture; pesticide laws; political decisions

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28470963     DOI: 10.1002/ps.4596

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pest Manag Sci        ISSN: 1526-498X            Impact factor:   4.845


  4 in total

Review 1.  Status and Prospects of Botanical Biopesticides in Europe and Mediterranean Countries.

Authors:  Fatma Acheuk; Shereen Basiouni; Awad A Shehata; Katie Dick; Haifa Hajri; Salma Lasram; Mete Yilmaz; Mevlüt Emekci; George Tsiamis; Marina Spona-Friedl; Helen May-Simera; Wolfgang Eisenreich; Spyridon Ntougias
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2022-02-15

Review 2.  Fungal Metabolite Antagonists of Plant Pests and Human Pathogens: Structure-Activity Relationship Studies.

Authors:  Marco Masi; Paola Nocera; Pierluigi Reveglia; Alessio Cimmino; Antonio Evidente
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 4.411

3.  Essential oil of Siparuna guianensis as an alternative tool for improved lepidopteran control and resistance management practices.

Authors:  Adriano M Lourenço; Khalid Haddi; Bergman M Ribeiro; Roberto F T Corrêia; Hudson V V Tomé; Oscar Santos-Amaya; Eliseu J G Pereira; Raul N C Guedes; Gil R Santos; Eugênio E Oliveira; Raimundo W S Aguiar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Why has the authorization of microbial biological control agents been slower in the EU than in comparable jurisdictions?

Authors:  Ingvar Sundh; Jørgen Eilenberg
Journal:  Pest Manag Sci       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 4.845

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.