AIMS: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in veno-arterial configuration represents an increasingly used method for circulatory support. ECMO in cardiogenic shock offers rapid improvement of circulatory status and significant increase in tissue perfusion. Current evidence on the use of ECMO in cardiogenic shock remains insufficient. The aim of the ECMO-CS trial is to compare two recognized therapeutic approaches in the management of severe cardiogenic shock: early conservative therapy and early implantation of veno-arterial ECMO on the background of standard care. METHODS:Eligible patients have either rapidly deteriorating or severe cardiogenic shock, defined using echocardiography, hemodynamic and metabolic criteria. Patients are randomized to the one of two arms: immediate veno-arterial ECMO therapy or early conservative therapy. All other diagnostic and therapeutic procedures are performed as per current standard of care, including other cardiovascular interventions (i.e. percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery). Follow-up includes visits at 30 days, 6 months and 12 months. Primary endpoint is a composite of death from any cause, resuscitated circulatory arrest, and implantation of another mechanical circulatory support device at 30 days. The sample size of 120 individuals (60 in each arm) provides 80% power to detect 50% reduction of primary endpoint, at alpha = 0.05. Patient recruitment started in October 2014. CONCLUSION: The results of the ECMO-CS trial may significantly influence current practice in the management of patients with severe and rapidly deteriorating cardiogenic shock. ECMO-CS trial registration number is NCT02301819.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in veno-arterial configuration represents an increasingly used method for circulatory support. ECMO in cardiogenic shock offers rapid improvement of circulatory status and significant increase in tissue perfusion. Current evidence on the use of ECMO in cardiogenic shock remains insufficient. The aim of the ECMO-CS trial is to compare two recognized therapeutic approaches in the management of severe cardiogenic shock: early conservative therapy and early implantation of veno-arterial ECMO on the background of standard care. METHODS: Eligible patients have either rapidly deteriorating or severe cardiogenic shock, defined using echocardiography, hemodynamic and metabolic criteria. Patients are randomized to the one of two arms: immediate veno-arterial ECMO therapy or early conservative therapy. All other diagnostic and therapeutic procedures are performed as per current standard of care, including other cardiovascular interventions (i.e. percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery). Follow-up includes visits at 30 days, 6 months and 12 months. Primary endpoint is a composite of death from any cause, resuscitated circulatory arrest, and implantation of another mechanical circulatory support device at 30 days. The sample size of 120 individuals (60 in each arm) provides 80% power to detect 50% reduction of primary endpoint, at alpha = 0.05. Patient recruitment started in October 2014. CONCLUSION: The results of the ECMO-CS trial may significantly influence current practice in the management of patients with severe and rapidly deteriorating cardiogenic shock. ECMO-CS trial registration number is NCT02301819.
Authors: Darryl Abrams; A Reshad Garan; Akram Abdelbary; Matthew Bacchetta; Robert H Bartlett; James Beck; Jan Belohlavek; Yih-Sharng Chen; Eddy Fan; Niall D Ferguson; Jo-Anne Fowles; John Fraser; Michelle Gong; Ibrahim F Hassan; Carol Hodgson; Xiaotong Hou; Katarzyna Hryniewicz; Shingo Ichiba; William A Jakobleff; Roberto Lorusso; Graeme MacLaren; Shay McGuinness; Thomas Mueller; Pauline K Park; Giles Peek; Vin Pellegrino; Susanna Price; Erika B Rosenzweig; Tetsuya Sakamoto; Leonardo Salazar; Matthieu Schmidt; Arthur S Slutsky; Christian Spaulding; Hiroo Takayama; Koji Takeda; Alain Vuylsteke; Alain Combes; Daniel Brodie Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2018-02-15 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Petr Ostadal; Mikulas Mlcek; Holger Gorhan; Ivo Simundic; Svitlana Strunina; Matej Hrachovina; Andreas Krüger; Dagmar Vondrakova; Marek Janotka; Pavel Hala; Martin Mates; Martin Ostadal; James C Leiter; Otomar Kittnar; Petr Neuzil Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-04-24 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Isabell Yan; Benedikt Schrage; Jessica Weimann; Salim Dabboura; Rafel Hilal; Benedikt N Beer; Peter Moritz Becher; Moritz Seiffert; Christina Magnussen; Renate B Schnabel; Paulus Kirchhof; Stefan Blankenberg; Dirk Westermann Journal: ESC Heart Fail Date: 2021-03-24
Authors: Harry Magunia; Aida M Guerrero; Marius Keller; Johann Jacoby; Christian Schlensak; Helene Haeberle; Michael Koeppen; Martina Nowak-Machen; Peter Rosenberger Journal: J Intensive Care Med Date: 2020-04-10 Impact factor: 3.510
Authors: Mir B Basir; Duane S Pinto; Boback Ziaeian; Akshay Khandelwal; Jennifer Cowger; William Suh; Andrew Althouse Journal: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2021-03-07 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Adamantios Tsangaris; Tamas Alexy; Rajat Kalra; Marinos Kosmopoulos; Andrea Elliott; Jason A Bartos; Demetris Yannopoulos Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2021-07-07