Stalk versus base invasion in pT1 papillary cancers of the bladder: improved substaging system predicting the risk of progression.

AIMS: Pathological stage pT1 bladder cancers constitute a clinically heterogeneous group. However, current staging guidelines for superficially invasive cancers do not acknowledge the variability in type and extent of lamina propria invasion in papillary urothelial carcinomas (PUCs), and historically proposed substaging systems showed either high interobserver variation or limited value in predicting patient outcomes. The aim of this study was to reappraise pT1 PUC substaging, with the objective of identifying a novel scheme that is reproducible and prognostically meaningful. METHODS AND
RESULTS: pT1 PUCs diagnosed during 1999-2015 were retrospectively reviewed and characterized as focal invasion confined to the papillary stalk, focal invasion of the tumour base, or extensive invasion of the tumour base. Cases with concurrent flat carcinoma in situ, angiolymphatic invasion, absent muscularis propria or clinically advanced disease were excluded. We calculated cumulative incidence rates of recurrence, progression and death by tumour subtype, and evaluated differential risks by using log-rank tests and Kaplan-Meier curves stratified by type and extent of invasion. Among 62 patients satisfying the inclusion criteria, 22 of 29 patients with base-extensive invasion progressed, whereas four of 13 with base-focal and none of 20 with stalk-only invasion progressed. There was strong evidence that base-extensive patients had a higher risk of progression and death resulting from bladder cancer than base-focal or stalk-only patients (P < 0.0001). However, tumour subtype was not significantly associated with risk of recurrence (P = 0.21).
CONCLUSIONS: We propose an innovative substaging approach for reporting the site and extent of lamina propria invasion in patients with pT1 PUC, allowing patient stratification for risk of progression.