Literature DB >> 28470515

Assessment of Cell Viability with Single-, Dual-, and Multi-Staining Methods Using Image Cytometry.

Leo Li-Ying Chan1, Kelsey J McCulley2, Sarah L Kessel2.   

Abstract

The ability to accurately measure cell viability is important for any cell-based assay. Traditionally, viability measurements have been performed using the trypan blue exclusion method on a hemacytometer, which allows researchers to visually distinguish viable from nonviable cells. While the trypan blue method can work for cell lines or primary cells that have been rigorously purified, in more complex samples such as PBMCs, bone marrow, whole blood, or any sample with low viability, this method can lead to errors. In recent years, advances in optics and fluorescent dyes have led to the development of automated benchtop image-based cell counters for rapid cell concentration and viability measurement. In this work, we demonstrate the use of image-based cytometry for cell viability detection using single-, dual-, or multi-stain techniques. Single-staining methods using nucleic acid stains such as EB, PI, 7-AAD, DAPI, SYTOX Green, and SYTOX Red, and enzymatic stains such as CFDA and Calcein AM, were performed. Dual-staining methods using AO/PI, CFDA/PI, Calcein AM/PI, Hoechst/PI, Hoechst/DRAQ7, and DRAQ5/DAPI that enumerate viable and nonviable cells were also performed. Finally, Hoechst/Calcein AM/PI was used for a multi-staining method. Fluorescent viability staining allows exclusion of cellular debris and nonnucleated cells from analysis, which can eliminate the need to perform purification steps during sample preparation and improve efficiency. Image cytometers increase speed and throughput, capture images for visual confirmation of results, and can greatly simplify cell count and viability measurements.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Celigo; Cellometer; Enzymatic stain; Fluorescent stain; Image cytometry; Multi-stain method; Nucleic acid stain; Trypan blue; Viability

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28470515     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-6960-9_3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  6 in total

1.  A Study of the Cellular Uptake of Magnetic Branched Amphiphilic Peptide Capsules.

Authors:  Pavithra Natarajan; Jonathan D Roberts; Nitish Kunte; Wayne B Hunter; Sherry D Fleming; John M Tomich; L Adriana Avila
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  Restoring Genetic Resource through In Vitro Culturing Testicular Cells from the Cryo-Preserved Tissue of the American Shad (Alosa sapidissima).

Authors:  Hong-Yan Xu; Xiao-You Hong; Chao-Yue Zhong; Xu-Ling Wu; Xin-Ping Zhu
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-22

3.  Multiplexed-Based Assessment of DNA Damage Response to Chemotherapies Using Cell Imaging Cytometry.

Authors:  Nadia Vezzio-Vié; Marie-Alice Kong-Hap; Eve Combès; Augusto Faria Andrade; Maguy Del Rio; Philippe Pasero; Charles Theillet; Céline Gongora; Philippe Pourquier
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 6.208

4.  Caveats to the use of MTT, neutral red, Hoechst and Resazurin to measure silver nanoparticle cytotoxicity.

Authors:  Danielle F Mello; Rafael Trevisan; Nelson Rivera; Nicholas K Geitner; Richard T Di Giulio; Mark R Wiesner; Heileen Hsu-Kim; Joel N Meyer
Journal:  Chem Biol Interact       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 5.192

5.  Observation and quantification of the morphological effect of trypan blue rupturing dead or dying cells.

Authors:  Leo Li-Ying Chan; William L Rice; Jean Qiu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Development of a miniaturized 3D organoid culture platform for ultra-high-throughput screening.

Authors:  Yuhong Du; Xingnan Li; Qiankun Niu; Xiulei Mo; Min Qui; Tingxuan Ma; Calvin J Kuo; Haian Fu
Journal:  J Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 6.216

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.