| Literature DB >> 28469943 |
Norihide Murayama1, Kei Asai2, Kikuno Murayama1, Chihiro Kitatsuji3, Satoru Doi4.
Abstract
Among inhaled asthma therapies, the present study aimed to identify factors for selecting the type of inhalation therapy for asthma. Three methods are used to deliver inhaled cromoglycate, and the airway deposition rate was evaluated using a cascade impactor with 3 dosage forms: dry powder (DP), pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI), and solution (jet- and mesh-types). The percentage of particles with diameters of 2-6 μm was 17.0% for the capsule, 51.8% for pMDI, 49.0% for jet-type NE-C28, and 40.4% for mesh-type NE-U22. The amounts of drug deposited in the bronchi were based on the particle distribution of the various dosage forms: 3.4 mg for the capsule, 1.0 mg for pMDI, 9.8 mg for one solution (jet-type NE-C28), and 8.1 mg for the other solution (mesh-type NE-U22). Jet-type or mesh-type electric nebulizers delivered 2-3 times more of the drug than capsules, and, compared with pMDI, 8-9 times more of the drug was deposited in the bronchi/bronchioles. Electric nebulizers are considered the best method. This study suggests that the size of particles deposited at sites of obstruction is larger than previously reported, and no obstruction of small airways occurs (<2 mm).Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28469943 PMCID: PMC5392389 DOI: 10.1155/2017/1892725
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Drug Deliv ISSN: 2090-3022
Figure 1A Marple-type cascade impactor. Each compartment of the impactor (stages 1 to 8) and the slit size (mean value) of each stage. The slit size is indicated by width and length (stages 1 to 6) and diameter (stages 7 to 8). In a cascade impactor, the flow velocity through the slits increases in more distal stages. The situation is the complete opposite in the human airway.
Sizes of cascade impactor slits.
| Stage number | Width (mm) | Length (mm) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.60 | 9.51 |
| 2 | 1.43 | 9.48 |
| 3 | 0.84 | 8.91 |
| 4 | 0.43 | 9.52 |
| 5 | 0.27 | 9.03 |
| 6 | 0.17 | 4.64 |
|
| ||
| Diameter (mm) | ||
|
| ||
| 7 | 0.45 | |
| 8 | 0.34 | |
Figure 2Measurement of particle size distribution with a mesh-type nebulizer NE-U22 using a cascade impactor.
Figure 3Results of analysis using a cascade impactor. Particle size distribution and cumulative values in 4 dosage forms: (a) Intal capsule (DP), (b) Intal MDI, (c) one solution inhalant (a mesh-type nebulizer NE-U22), and (d) the other solution inhalant (a jet-type nebulizer NE-C28) are shown in blue and pink, respectively. The data points represent the means of three independent experiments.
Results of the study.
| Capsule | pMDI | Jet-type nebulizer | Mesh-type nebulizer | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMAD ( | 50.0 | 5.2 | 3.2 | 5.2 |
| Distribution pattern | Bimodal | Unimodal | Unimodal | Unimodal |
| Percentage of particles 2–6 | 17.0% | 51.8% | 49.0% | 40.4% |
| Standard dose per one-time use (mg) | 20 | 2 | 20 | 20 |
| Amount deposited in the bronchi by administration of treatment dose (mg) | 3.4 | 1.0 | 9.8 | 8.1 |
MMAD: massive medium aerodynamic diameter, pMDI: pressured metered dose inhaler.
Figure 4Excerpt from the instructions for use of the Marple-type cascade impactor.