| Literature DB >> 28469903 |
Analiza Baldonado1, Ofelia Hawk1, Thomas Ormiston1, Danielle Nelson1.
Abstract
Patients who are high risk high cost (HRHC), those with severe or multiple medical issues, and the chronically ill elderly are major drivers of rising health care costs.1 The HRHC patients with complex health conditions and functional limitations may likely go to emergency rooms and hospitals, need more supportive services, and use long-term care facilities.2 As a result, these patient populations are vulnerable to fragmented care and "falling through the cracks".2 A large county health and hospital system in California, USA introduced evidence-based interventions in accordance with the Triple AIM3 focused on patient-centered health care, prevention, health maintenance, and safe transitions across the care continuum. The pilot program embedded a Transitional Care Manager (TCM) within an outpatient Family Medicine clinic to proactively assist HRHC patients with outreach assistance, problem-solving and facilitating smooth transitions of care. This initiative is supported by a collaborative team that included physicians, nurses, specialists, health educator, and pharmacist. The initial 50 patients showed a decrease in Emergency Department (ED) encounters (pre-vs post intervention: 33 vs 17) and hospital admissions (pre-vs post intervention: 32 vs 11), improved patient outcomes, and cost saving. As an example, one patient had 1 ED visit and 5 hospital admission with total charges of $217,355.75 in the 6 months' pre-intervention with no recurrence of ED or hospital admissions in the 6 months of TCM enrollment. The preliminary findings showed improvement of patient-centered outcomes, quality of care, and resource utilization however more data is required.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28469903 PMCID: PMC5411719 DOI: 10.1136/bmjquality.u212974.w5206
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ Qual Improv Rep ISSN: 2050-1315
Figure 1TCM Workflow
| Date Time line: 8/1/2014 to 2/1/2015 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patient # | ED visit in 6 months before intervention | Hospitalization 6 months before intervention | ED visit w TCM | Hospitalization w TCM | Months measured |
| 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 6 months |
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 months |
| 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 months |
| 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 months |
| 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 months |
| 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 months |
| 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 months |
| 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 months |
| 9 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 months |
| 10 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 3 months |
| 11 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 3 months |
| 12 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 months |
| 13 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 months |
| 14 | 11 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 2 months |
| 15 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 months |
| 16 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 months |
| Total | 21 | 13 | 12 | 4 | |
| Date of referrals | ED encounters (without TCM) | ED encounters (with TCM) | Percentage decrease in ER encounters | Hospitalization (without TCM) | Hospitalization (with TCM) | Percentage decrease in Hospitalization | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # of Pts | ||||||||
| Project Phase 1 | 8/1/2014- 10/27/2014 | 16 | 21 | 12 | 43% | 13 | 4 | 61.50% |
| Project Phase 2 | 11/06/2014- 3/24/15 | 34 | 12 | 5 | 58.30% | 19 | 7 | 68.40% |
| Total | 50 | 33 | 17 | 32 | 11 |
Figure 2Patient visit rate to ED and hospital
Figure 3Potential financial changes