| Literature DB >> 28469603 |
Yitian Gao1, Di Wu1, Lei Wang1, Chen Lin1,2, Chengbang Ma1, Xinping Xi1, Mei Zhou1, Jinao Duan3, Olaf R P Bininda-Emonds4, Tianbao Chen1, Chris Shaw1.
Abstract
Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) in the skin secretions of amphibians are fundamental components of a unique defense system that has evolved to protect these hosts from microbial invasion. Medusins constitute a recently-discovered AMP family from phyllomedusine leaf frog skin and exhibit highly-conserved structural characteristics. Here, we report a novel medusin, medusin-PT, from the skin secretion of the Tarsier Leaf Frog, Phyllomedusa tarsius. The mature peptide was initially identified from its cloned biosynthetic precursor-encoding cDNA as obtained by the rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) method. Reverse-phase HPLC and tandem mass spectrometry confirmed both the presence of medusin-PT in the skin secretion and its primary structure. In a range of bioassays, medusin-PT exhibited antimicrobial activity against only the Gram-positive bacterium Staphylococcus aureus at 64 μg/ml. However, after directed changes to enhance the cationicity and amphipathicity of the peptide structure, three analog showed more potent antimicrobial activity against several additional bacteria including the antibiotic-resistant bacterium MRSA. In addition, these analog exhibited activity against microbial biofilm (minimum biofilm inhibitory and eradication concentrations of 32 μg/ml and over 64 μg/ml, respectively). These data provide evidence that medusins might be promising candidates as novel antibiotic leads and that the targeted modification of a natural AMP can both improve its efficacy so as to provide new insights into antibiotic design and development.Entities:
Keywords: MRSA; amphibian skin secretion; analog design; antibiofilm; medusin; molecular cloning
Year: 2017 PMID: 28469603 PMCID: PMC5395648 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00628
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Figure 1Sequence alignment of precursors of medusin-AC, medusin-PD, medusin-PH, and medusin-PT. 1. Putative signal peptide. 2. Acidic spacer peptide region. 3. Propeptide convertase processing site. 4. Acidic spacer peptide region. 5. Propeptide convertase processing site. 6. Mature peptide. 7. Glycine residue amide donor. Conserved residues are indicated in yellow highlight and asterisks. Adapted from sequences published in Xi et al. (2013).
Figure 2(A) Reverse phase HPLC chromatogram of skin secretion of P. tarsius monitored at 214 nm. The arrow indicates the retention time of medusin-PT. (B) Annotated fragment ion spectrum of medusin-PT. (C) Predicted b- and y-ions arising from collision induced dissociation (CID) of the doubly-charged (905.57 m/z, [M+2H]2+) precursor ion. The observed b- and y-ions are indicated in blue and red typefaces.
Figure 3(A) Helical wheel projections of the four peptides medusin-PT, medusin-PT1, medusin-PT1a, and medusin-PT2, with arrows indicating the direction of summed vectors of hydrophobicity. (B) Predicted 3D models of medusin-PT and medusin-PT2 rendered with PyMol. Side chains of the modified position 6 were shown and other side chains were neglected. The modified peptide Medusin-PT2 showed a clearly enhanced helical structure compared with the native peptide medusin-PT. (C) Superimposition of CD spectra recorded for the four medusin peptides (100 μM) in 10 mM in ammonium acetate buffer and in 50% TFE ammonium acetate buffer.
The predicted physicochemical parameters and calculated percentage of helical content of medusin-PT, medusin-PT1, medusin-PT1a, and medusin-PT2.
| medusin-PT | LLGMIPVAITAISALSKL-NH2 | 0.861 | 0.335 | 2 | 7 | 53 |
| medusin-PT1 | LLGMIPVAIKAISALSKL-NH2 | 0.791 | 0.404 | 3 | 6 | 52 |
| medusin-PT1a | LlGMIPVAIKAISALSKL-NH2 | 0.791 | 0.404 | 3 | 7 | 43 |
| medusin-PT2 | LLGMIKVAITAISALSKL-NH2 | 0.766 | 0.414 | 3 | 26 | 70 |
D-type amino acid substitution was indicated with lowercase letter.
Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs), minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBCs), and therapeutic indices (TI) of medusin-PT, medusin-PT1, medusin-PT1a, and medusin-PT2 against reference microorganisms.
| 64/128 | 8/16 | 8/16 | 8/16 | |
| MRSA | >512/>512 | 16/32 | 16/32 | 32/32 |
| >512/>512 | 32/32 | 32/32 | 32/32 | |
| >512/>512 | 16/16 | 8/8 | 8/8 | |
| >512/>512 | 256/512 | 128/128 | >512>512 | |
| >512/>512 | >512/>512 | 128/>512 | >512/>512 | |
| HC50 | 1.814 × 106 | 102.2 | 226.7 | 93.83 |
| TI (overall) | 2812.06 | 2.01 | 7.95 | 1.47 |
| TI (Gram-positive and yeast) | 3542.97 | 6.39 | 16.85 | 5.86 |
Figure 4(A) Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of medusin-PT, medusin-PT1, medusin-PT1a, and medusin-PT2 with or without serum degradation against S. aureus, E. coli, and C. albicans. (B) Effect of medusin-PT2 on DNA leakage recorded at 260 nm. S. aureus (gray) and C. albicans (black) are indicated. The error bar represents the standard error for three repeats. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001 significant difference between the absorption of test peptide concentration and the absorption of negative control (no peptide).
The biofilm formation inhibition and biofilm eradication activity of medusin and the analog against .
| medusin-PT | 512 | >512 |
| medusin-PT1 | 32 | 128 |
| medusin-PT1a | 32 | 64 |
| medusin-PT2 | 32 | 256 |