Literature DB >> 28469099

Clinical and Genetic Features of Chinese X-linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth Type 1 Disease.

Yuan-Yuan Lu1, He Lyu1, Su-Qin Jin1, Yue-Huan Zuo1, Jing Liu1, Zhao-Xia Wang1, Wei Zhang1, Yun Yuan1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: X-linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 1 (CMT1X) disease is one of the most common forms of inherited neuropathy caused by mutations in the gap junction beta-1 protein (GJB1) gene (also known as connexin 32). This study presented the clinical and genetic features of a series of Chinese patients with GJB1 gene mutations.
METHODS: A total of 22 patients from unrelated families, who were referred to Department of Neurology, Peking University First Hospital from January 2005 to January 2016, were identified with GJB1 mutations. Their clinical records and laboratory findings were retrospectively collected and reviewed. Mutations in the GJB1 gene were analyzed by targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS). Nucleotide alternations were confirmed with Sanger sequencing.
RESULTS: The CMT1X patients predominantly showed distal muscle weakness of lower limbs with mild sensory disturbance. The mean age of onset was 15.6 ± 8.7 years (ranging from 1 year to 42 years). The sudden onset of cerebral symptoms appeared in four patients (18.2%); two were initial symptoms. One case had constant central nervous system (CNS) signs. There were 19 different heterozygous mutations, including 15 known mutations and four novel mutations (c.115G>T, c.380T>A, c.263C>A, and c.818_819insGGGCT). Among the 22 Chinese patients with CMT1X, the frequency of the GJB1 mutation was 4.5% in transmembrane domain 1 (TM1), 4.5% in TM2, 22.7% in TM3, 9.1% in TM4, 4.5% in extracellular 1 (EC1), 27.3% in EC2, 9.1% in intracellular loop, 13.6% in the N-terminal domain, and 4.5% in the C-terminal domain. CMT1X with CNS impairment appeared in five (22.7%) of these patients.
CONCLUSIONS: This study indicated that CNS impairment was not rare in Chinese CMT1X patients. Mutations in the EC2 domain of the GJB1 gene were hotspot in Chinese CMT1X patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28469099      PMCID: PMC5421174          DOI: 10.4103/0366-6999.204925

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)        ISSN: 0366-6999            Impact factor:   2.628


Introduction

X-linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 1 (CMT1X) disease is a hereditary chronic progressive disease, which is caused by mutations in the gap junction beta-1 protein (GJB1) gene encoding the gap junction protein connexin 32 (Cx32). Clinically, the disease is characterized by the chronic progressive wasting and weakness of distal muscles in the lower limbs with sensory disturbance usually from the second decade. Some patients experience sensorineural hearing loss and central nervous system (CNS) involvement.[1234] Nerve conduction velocity test shows a moderate neuropathy, and sural biopsy usually shows axonal or mixed axonal-demyelinating neuropathy pathology.[56] CMT1X has been described in Chinese patients since 2001.[378910111213141516171819] Most of these were case reports,[814171920] summarized electrophysiological findings,[21012131418] or pathological features in a few cases.[1819] Here, we reported the clinical features and genetic mutations of GJB1 gene in a large Chinese patient cohort.

Methods

Ethical approval

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the local Ethics Committee of Peking University First Hospital. Informed written consent was obtained from all patients prior to their enrollment in this study.

Patients

Ninety-two patients with CMT from unrelated families were diagnosed by next-generation sequencing (NGS) at the Department of Neurology, Peking University First Hospital from January 2005 to January 2016. Among them, a total of 22 patients with GJB1 mutations were recruited in this study, which comprised 23.9% of the total CMT patients. As for the other CMT genes, the mutation frequency was 35.9% in peripheral myelin protein 22 gene, 17.4% in mitofusin 2 gene, 2.2% in myelin protein zero gene, 5.4% in inverted formin, FH2 and WH2 domain containing (INF2) gene, 4.3% in ganglioside-induced differentiation associated protein 1 gene, 2.2% in neurofilament light gene, 2.2% in periaxin gene, 1.1% in SH3 domain and tetratricopeptide repeats 2 gene, 1.1% in early growth response 2 gene, 1.1% in glycyl-tRNA synthetase gene, 1.1% in leucine rich repeat and sterile alpha motif containing 1 gene, 1.1% in FIG4 phosphoinositide 5-phosphatase (FIG4) gene, 1.1% in alanyl-tRNA synthetase gene, and 1.1% in dehydrogenase E1 and transketolase domain containing 1 gene. The clinical records and electrophysiological characteristics of these 22 CMT1X patients with GJB1 mutations were retrospectively collected and reviewed. Muscle weakness was evaluated using the Medical Research Council score. All patients were interviewed and examined by two neurologists.

Mutation analysis

Genomic DNA was extracted from the peripheral blood samples of all patients. Mutations in the GJB1 gene were analyzed by targeted NGS. NGS panel covered all of the exons and their flanking sequences of genes known to be associated with hereditary neuropathies (gene list available on request). The exons and their flanking splice sites were captured and subsequently sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 2500 Sequencer (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). The sequencing files were mapped to reference sequences with Burrows-Wheeler Aligner and Picard tools and then called with control samples with the GATK 3.0 HaplotypeCaller (Broad Institute, USA). Nucleotide alternations were confirmed with Sanger sequencing. The segregation analyses of the mutations were confirmed in the parents and the affected family members. For the novel mutations, 1000 healthy controls of Chinese origin were screened. The biological relevance of the novel amino acid changes was studied using both PolyPhen-2 (http://www.genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2/) and Mutation Taster (http://www.mutationtaster.org/) programs.

Results

Patients’ clinical and electrophysiological characteristics

These 22 patients came from unrelated families, including 20 males and 2 females. The clinical and electrophysiological characteristics of these CMT1X patients are shown in Table 1. The mean age of onset was 15.6 ± 8.7 years (ranging from 1 year to 42 years). Fifteen (68.2%) patients exhibited first symptoms in their second decade. Five (22.7%) of them presented symptoms after 20 years old. Two patients (9.1%) had an earlier onset before 10 years old, including one from infancy. The mean duration from onset to diagnostic time was 8.2 ± 4.5 years (ranging from 2 years to 18 years).
Table 1

The clinical and electrophysiological characteristics of 22 Chinese CMT1X patients in this study

Patient numberAge (years)GenderOnset age (years)Muscle strength in distal ULMuscle strength in distal LLSensory lossCNS lesionsCMAP in median nerves (mV)MCV in median nerves (m/s)SNAP in median nerves (mV)SCV in median nerves (m/s)CMAP in ulnar nerves (mV)MCV in ulnar nerves (m/s)SNAP in ulnar nerves (mV)SCV in ulnar nerves (m/s)CMAP in tibial nerves (mV)MCV in tibial nerves (m/s)
134Male21IVII2.735.5NENENANANANANANA
214Male11IVIV+2.536.012.141.01.8311.834.0NANA
323Male8VI–II+NENENENE4.733.1NENENENE
413Male10IIII–II+0.828.9NENE10.327.7NENE3.538.4
520Female15IV0–II2.138.0NANA0.746.7NANA0.338.4
624Male14VV2.743.98.743.04.833.14.637.61.0NA
717Male14VIV5.234.53.640.6NANA2.935.30.232.4
818Female12VIV3.035.01.8738.64.432−1.4735.80.127.7
937Male24VI–II+0.327.32.332.11.930.92.030.30.129.2
1019Male10VIVUL, LLNANANANANANANANANANA
1150Male32IVIIUL, LL2.338.9NENENANANENENENE
1234Male24VIVLLNANANANANANANANANANA
1315Male10V0–V+NANANANANANANANANANA
1424Male14V0–VLL4.738.08.766.01.5329.671.00.632.0
1513Male11VIVUL, LLNA28.0NANANANANANA4.832.4
1644Male42VIVNANANANANANANANANANA
1726Male18VILL3.439.8NENE3.241.75.737.6NENE
1827Male15IVIIUL, LL0.2NA1.442.00.3NA1.441.70.2NA
1919Male12IVI–IIUL, LL0.828.9NENE9.127.7NENENANA
2021Male11VI–IV1.833.91.436.41.834NENE0.023.0
2119Male14V0–IVNANANANANANANANANANA
2212Male1IVIVNA37.9NA38.2NANANANANA39.2

CMT1X: X-linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 1; LL: Low limbs; UL: Upper limbs; +: Positive; −: Negative; CNS: Central nervous system; MCV: Motor conduction velocity; CMAP: Compound motor action potential; SCV: Sensory conduction velocity; SNAP, Sensory nerve action potential; NE: Not elicited; NA: Not available.

The clinical and electrophysiological characteristics of 22 Chinese CMT1X patients in this study CMT1X: X-linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 1; LL: Low limbs; UL: Upper limbs; +: Positive; −: Negative; CNS: Central nervous system; MCV: Motor conduction velocity; CMAP: Compound motor action potential; SCV: Sensory conduction velocity; SNAP, Sensory nerve action potential; NE: Not elicited; NA: Not available. All patients showed distal muscle wasting and weakness of the lower limbs, with the involvement of the upper limbs in 13 cases. Muscle strength ranged from III to V in distal upper limbs and from 0 to V in distal lower limbs. Sensory loss in distal limbs appeared in eight cases. Pes cavus occurred in 16 cases. CNS involvement appeared in five patients (22.7%), including four cases with transient CNS symptoms and one case with constant CNS signs. Four cases (18.2%) with transient symptoms presented with sudden onset of cerebral symptoms including aphasia, dysphagia, quadriplegia, or paralysis induced by fever or infection. The symptoms usually lasted from hours to days, and the patients completely recovered without special treatment. CNS symptoms in two patients appeared initially before the development of peripheral neuropathy. One case with constant CNS involvement additionally presented with nystagmus and ataxia on physical examination. In median nerves, the mean motor nerve conduction velocity (MCV) was 35.0 ± 4.8 m/s (range: 27.3–43.9 m/s), the mean amplitude of compound muscle action potential (CAMP) was 2.3 ± 1.5 mV (range: 0.2–5.2 mV), the mean sensory nerve conduction velocity (SCV) was 42.0 ± 9.6 m/s (range: 32.1–66.0 m/s), and the mean sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) amplitude was 5.0 ± 4.2 mV (range: 1.4–12.1 mV). In ulnar nerves, the mean MCV was 33.6 ± 5.7 m/s (range: 27.7–46.7 m/s), the mean CAMP amplitude was 3.7 ± 3.2 mV (range: 0.3–10.3 mV), the mean SCV was 40.4 ± 12.8 m/s (range: 30.3–71.0 m/s), and the SNAP mean amplitude was 3.3 ± 3.3 mV (ranging from −1.47 mV to 9.6 mV). In tibial nerves, the mean MCV was 32.5 ± 5.5 m/s (range: 23.0–39.2 m/s) and the mean CAMP amplitude was 1.1 ± 1.7 mV (range: 0.0–4.8 mV). The cranial magnetic resonance imagings (MRIs) of patient 2 revealed abnormal signals in the splenium and genu of the corpus callosum in the first episode and in the bilateral posterior limbs of the internal capsule and splenium of the corpus callosum in the second episode. The cranial MRIs of patient 3 revealed abnormal signals in the centrum semiovale bilaterally in the first episode, the signals enlarged at the same location in the second episode, and widened at the third episode; the abnormal signals were resolved at intervals. The cranial MRIs of patient 4 revealed abnormal signals in the posterior limb of the internal capsule and the periventricular area bilaterally. The MRIs of patient 13 revealed abnormal signals in the bilateral centrum semiovale and splenium of the corpus callosum [Figure 1].
Figure 1

Brain magnetic resonance imagings of a male patient with X-linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 1 (patient 13) revealed abnormal signals in the bilateral centrum semiovale (a–d) and splenium of the corpus callosum (e–h). (a and e): T1 weighted; (b and f): T2 weighted; (c and d): Fluid attenuated inversion recovery; and (d and h): Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.

Brain magnetic resonance imagings of a male patient with X-linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 1 (patient 13) revealed abnormal signals in the bilateral centrum semiovale (a–d) and splenium of the corpus callosum (e–h). (a and e): T1 weighted; (b and f): T2 weighted; (c and d): Fluid attenuated inversion recovery; and (d and h): Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.

Gap junction beta-1 protein mutations

This study identified 19 different heterozygous mutations in these 22 CMT1X patients [Table 2]. The c.44G>T, c.59T>G, c.62G>A, c.194A>G, c.379A>T, C.403_404insT, c.424C>T, c.425G>A, c.490C>T, c.533A>G, c.548G>A, c.547C>T, c.556G>A, c.590C>T, and c.614A>G mutations were reported previously. Four (c.115G>T, c.263C>A, c.380T>A, and c.818_819insGGGCT) were novel mutations. Patient 22 with a c.818_819insGGGCT mutation had an X-linked family history. Five family members had peripheral neuropathy. Patients with c.115G>T, c.380T>A, and c.263C>A mutations were sporadic, and the mutation was not found in their parents. All novel mutations were not found in 1000 healthy controls and also not found in NCBI SNP database, indicating that they were not benign polymorphisms. The novel missense mutations (c.115G>T, c.380T>A, and c.263C>A) were highly conserved in the Cx32 proteins across all mammalian species. The pathogenicities of the novel missense mutations were predicted to be possibly damaging (c.380T>A) and probably damaging (c.115G>T and c.263C>A) by Polyphen-2 and disease causing by Mutation Taster software. Patient 12 with pure peripheral neuropathy and patient 13 with CNS impairment had the same c.425G>A mutations.
Table 2

GJB1 mutations in 22 CMT1X patients from unrelated families in this study

Patient numberNucleotide changesAmino acid changesDomainNovel mutation
1c.44G>TR15LN-terminal domainNo
2c.59T>GI20TN-terminal domainNo
3c.62G>AG21DN-terminal domainNo
4c.115G>TA39STM1Yes
5c.194A>GY65CEC1No
6c.263C>AA88DTM2Yes
7c.379A>TI127FICYes
8c.380T>AI127NICNo
9C.403_404insTY135fsX146TM3No
10c.424C>TR142WTM3No
11c.424C>TR142WTM3No
12c.425G>AR142QTM3No
13c.425G>AR142QTM3No
14c.490C>TR164WEC2No
15c.533A>GD178GEC2No
16c.548G>AR183HEC2No
17c.548G>AR183HEC2No
18c.547C>TR183CEC2No
19c.556G>AE186KEC2No
20c.590C>TA197VTM4No
21c.614A>GN205STM4No
22c.818_819insGGGCTL273fsC-terminal domainYes

CMT1X: X-linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 1; EC: Extracellular domain; TM: Transmembrane domain; IC: Intracellular loop; GJB1: Gap junction beta-1 protein.

GJB1 mutations in 22 CMT1X patients from unrelated families in this study CMT1X: X-linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 1; EC: Extracellular domain; TM: Transmembrane domain; IC: Intracellular loop; GJB1: Gap junction beta-1 protein. Among 22 patients, the frequency of the GJB1 mutations was 4.5% in transmembrane domain 1 (TM1), 4.5% in TM2, 22.7% in TM3, 9.1% in TM4, 4.5% in extracellular 1 (EC1), 27.3% in EC2, 9.1% in intracellular loop, 13.6% in the N-terminal domain, and 4.5% in the C-terminal domain [Figure 2].
Figure 2

Distribution of the respective amino acid changes on the connexin 32 protein structure identified in 22 patients with X-linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 1. Different domains are indicated by rectangles with different colors. The positions of novel mutations are indicated in red.

Distribution of the respective amino acid changes on the connexin 32 protein structure identified in 22 patients with X-linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 1. Different domains are indicated by rectangles with different colors. The positions of novel mutations are indicated in red.

Discussion

This study confirmed that CMT1X was a common form of inherited neuropathy in Chinese patients with CMT because 23.9% of all 92 CMT families were CMT1X. This study observed that the proportion of CMT1X in Chinese population was greater than other reports. The proportion of CMT1X patients for all CMTs was 10.7% in Europe (n = 997),[21] 15.2% in the USA (n = 527),[22] 12.0% in Australia (n = 224),[23] and 10.9% in Japan (n = 128).[24] In a study of multi-ethnic Malaysian patients with CMTs (n = 25), CMT1X patients were all Chinese and accounted for 24% of the total CMT patients.[25] In this study, all CMT1X patients showed distal muscle weakness predominantly in the lower limbs with a mean onset age of 15.6 ± 8.7 years, similar to other reports.[22] Most patients began presenting their symptoms in their second or third decade. Patients with an earlier onset before 10 years old or in infancy were rare in the present study and other reports.[222627] Electrophysiological findings of our patients further confirmed that CMT1X is an intermediate neuropathy. Several types of hereditary neuropathies were associated with other organ involvement, such as distal motor neuropathy with optic atrophy,[28] hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis with cardiomyopathy,[29] and dominant inherited intermediate CMT with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis.[30] This study confirmed that CNS involvement was common in Chinese CMT1X. Dysarthria and hemiparesis were the main symptoms of our patients, and other similar symptoms have been occasionally reported in other countries.[313233343536] CNS symptoms developed after peripheral neuropathy symptoms in some patients in the present study, which has also been reported in previous studies.[3236] Brain MRIs showed abnormal transient lesions involving bilateral white matter in all patients. However, the involvement of the corpus callosum which was frequently reported did not appear in all cases in the present study.[3437] The isolated involvement of the centrum semiovale, internal capsule, and the periventricular area appeared in the present study as well as in other reports.[3839] We found that the EC2 domain of Cx32 protein was more affected in our patients. The EC2 domain was a hotspot mutation domain and was affected in 44% of Korean patients,[40] which was more frequent compared to our patients. Mutations in the EC1 and EC2 domains of Cx32 were in 65% of the patients with Spanish or Portuguese descent.[41] However, EC1 and EC2 were not hotspot mutation domains in Japanese[24] and Malaysian[25] patients. We found no relationship between the position of mutations and CNS involvement in CMT1X. In the present series, mutations of five patients with CNS involvement were located in the N-terminal, TM1, and TM3 domains of GJB1 gene. The c.425G>A mutation was found in patients with pure peripheral neuropathy as well as in patients with additional CNS involvement. Four novel mutations in GJB1 gene were found in our cohort, which expands the spectrum of mutations in CMT1X. In summary, CNS impairment was not rare in Chinese CMT1X patients. The CMT1X diagnosis should be considered in children with transient CNS impairment with or without any signs of peripheral neuropathy. Mutations in the EC2 domain of the GJB1 gene were hotspot in Chinese CMT1X patients.

Financial support and sponsorship

This study was supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation of China (No. 81471185).

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  37 in total

1.  X-linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease with transient splenium lesion on MRI.

Authors:  Kazumasa Okada; Hirotsugu Fujiwara; Sadatoshi Tsuji
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 1.271

2.  Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease masquerading as acute demyelinating encephalomyelitis-like illness.

Authors:  Gun-Ha Kim; Kyoung Min Kim; Sang-Il Suh; Chang-Seok Ki; Baik-Lin Eun
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Four novel connexin 32 mutations in X-linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Phenotypic variability and central nervous system involvement.

Authors:  Georgia Karadima; Georgios Koutsis; Maria Raftopoulou; Paraskewi Floroskufi; Karolina-Maria Karletidi; Marios Panas
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 3.181

Review 4.  Demyelinating and axonal features of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease with mutations of myelin-related proteins (PMP22, MPZ and Cx32): a clinicopathological study of 205 Japanese patients.

Authors:  Naoki Hattori; Masahiko Yamamoto; Tsuyoshi Yoshihara; Haruki Koike; Masanori Nakagawa; Hiroo Yoshikawa; Akio Ohnishi; Kiyoshi Hayasaka; Osamu Onodera; Masayuki Baba; Hitoshi Yasuda; Toyokazu Saito; Kenji Nakashima; Jun-ichi Kira; Ryuji Kaji; Nobuyuki Oka; Gen Sobue
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 13.501

5.  A novel deletion mutation in GJB1 causes X-linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease in a Han Chinese family.

Authors:  Pengfei Lin; Fei Mao; Qiji Liu; Wanling Yang; Changshun Shao; Chuanzhu Yan; Yaoqin Gong
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.217

Review 6.  A Review of X-linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease.

Authors:  Ying Wang; Fei Yin
Journal:  J Child Neurol       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 1.987

7.  CNS involvement in CMTX1 caused by a novel connexin 32 mutation: a 6-year follow-up in neuroimaging and nerve conduction.

Authors:  Chong Xie; Xiajun Zhou; Desheng Zhu; Wei Liu; Xiaoqing Wang; Hong Yang; Zezhi Li; Yong Hao; Guang-Xian Zhang; Yangtai Guan
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 3.307

8.  CMT subtypes and disease burden in patients enrolled in the Inherited Neuropathies Consortium natural history study: a cross-sectional analysis.

Authors:  V Fridman; B Bundy; M M Reilly; D Pareyson; C Bacon; J Burns; J Day; S Feely; R S Finkel; T Grider; C A Kirk; D N Herrmann; M Laurá; J Li; T Lloyd; C J Sumner; F Muntoni; G Piscosquito; S Ramchandren; R Shy; C E Siskind; S W Yum; I Moroni; E Pagliano; S Zuchner; S S Scherer; M E Shy
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 10.154

9.  Mutation Analysis of Gap Junction Protein Beta 1 and Genotype-Phenotype Correlation in X-linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease in Chinese Patients.

Authors:  Bo Sun; Zhao-Hui Chen; Li Ling; Yi-Fan Li; Li-Zhi Liu; Fei Yang; Xu-Sheng Huang
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 2.628

10.  Hereditary Transthyretin Amyloidosis in Eight Chinese Families.

Authors:  Ling-Chao Meng; He Lyu; Wei Zhang; Jing Liu; Zhao-Xia Wang; Yun Yuan
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 2.628

View more
  7 in total

1.  An 8-generation family with X-linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth: Confirmation Of the pathogenicity Of a 3' untranslated region mutation in GJB1 and its clinical features.

Authors:  Dong-Hui Chen; Maxwell Ma; Mena Scavina; Elizabeth Blue; John Wolff; Prasanthi Karna; Michael O Dorschner; Wendy H Raskind; Thomas D Bird
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 3.217

Review 2.  New evidence for secondary axonal degeneration in demyelinating neuropathies.

Authors:  Kathryn R Moss; Taylor S Bopp; Anna E Johnson; Ahmet Höke
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Nine-hole Peg Test and Ten-meter Walk Test for Evaluating Functional Loss in Chinese Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease.

Authors:  Hui-Xia Niu; Rui-Hao Wang; Hong-Liang Xu; Bo Song; Jing Yang; Chang-He Shi; Yu-Sheng Li; Bing-Qian Zhang; Shao-Ping Wang; Quan Yong; Yuan-Yuan Wang; Yu-Ming Xu
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2017-08-05       Impact factor: 2.628

4.  Recurrent episodes of reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy in three Chinese families with GJB1 mutations in X-linked Charcot-Marie-tooth type 1 disease: cases report.

Authors:  Youlong Liang; Jingli Liu; Daobin Cheng; Yu Wu; Liuhong Mo; Wen Huang
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 2.474

5.  Novel mutations in GJB1 trigger intracellular aggregation and stress granule formation in X-linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease.

Authors:  Fan Chu; Jiaming Xu; Yong Wang; Yingjie Li; Yaling Wang; Zhijun Liu; Chuanzhou Li
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 5.152

Review 6.  Recent Advances in Drosophila Models of Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease.

Authors:  Fukiko Kitani-Morii; Yu-Ichi Noto
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  AAV9-mediated Schwann cell-targeted gene therapy rescues a model of demyelinating neuropathy.

Authors:  Alexia Kagiava; Christos Karaiskos; Jan Richter; Christina Tryfonos; Matthew J Jennings; Amanda J Heslegrave; Irene Sargiannidou; Marina Stavrou; Henrik Zetterberg; Mary M Reilly; Christina Christodoulou; Rita Horvath; Kleopas A Kleopa
Journal:  Gene Ther       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 5.250

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.